2013/3/8 Abir Basak
> If I want to debug an executable created with clang 3.2 rubenvb build, it
> shows DW_FORM_strp pointing outside .debug_str section
> The gdb version comes with the build
> GNU gdb (rubenvb-4.6.3-2-release) 7.5.50.20121228-cvs
>
> Is there any way I can debug an application
Hi Ruben!
Great. Thanks for clearing things up.
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 10:09 AM, Ruben Van Boxem
wrote:
> 2013/3/22 K. Frank
>
>> Hello Ruben!
>> ...
> No, I never implied such a thing. I was talking about x86 only. There is no
> dw2 for x64 and in all likelihood never will be.
>>
>> Let me c
2013/3/22 niXman
> 2013/3/22 K. Frank:
> > Hello List (and Ruben)!
> >
> > I am thinking about upgrading my compiler (and various libraries I use).
> > I am currently using one of Ruben's 64-bit 4.7 builds.
> >
> > I'm looking for additional c++11 support, keeping, of course, support for
> > std:
2013/3/22 K. Frank
> Hello Ruben!
>
> On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 6:22 AM, Ruben Van Boxem
> wrote:
> > 2013/3/22 JonY
> >>
> >> On 3/22/2013 11:26, K. Frank wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> If you're interested in a binary compatibility topic that might
> affect
> >> >> you --
> >> >> and since you so kindly
2013/3/22 K. Frank:
> Hello List (and Ruben)!
>
> I am thinking about upgrading my compiler (and various libraries I use).
> I am currently using one of Ruben's 64-bit 4.7 builds.
>
> I'm looking for additional c++11 support, keeping, of course, support for
> std::thread. I imagine that 4.8 is the
Hello List (and Ruben)!
I am thinking about upgrading my compiler (and various libraries I use).
I am currently using one of Ruben's 64-bit 4.7 builds.
I'm looking for additional c++11 support, keeping, of course, support for
std::thread. I imagine that 4.8 is the way to go.
My wish list:
6
Hello Ruben!
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 6:22 AM, Ruben Van Boxem
wrote:
> 2013/3/22 JonY
>>
>> On 3/22/2013 11:26, K. Frank wrote:
>> >
>> >> If you're interested in a binary compatibility topic that might affect
>> >> you --
>> >> and since you so kindly brought the mingw community in -- be carefu
On 3/22/2013 18:22, Ruben Van Boxem wrote:
>>>
>>> Yes, another compatibility issue. I've been using the dwarf2 version.
>>> (But there are sjlj advocates out there.)
>>>
>>
>> Yes, DW2 is quite frankly broken on Windows, since you'll never be able
>> to recompile system libraries to be able to th
2013/3/22 JonY
> On 3/22/2013 11:26, K. Frank wrote:
> >
> >> If you're interested in a binary compatibility topic that might affect
> you --
> >> and since you so kindly brought the mingw community in -- be careful
> about the
> >> C++ exception model from your mingw compiler. They are
> binary-
2013/3/22 JonY :
> Yes, DW2 is quite frankly broken on Windows, since you'll never be able
> to recompile system libraries to be able to throw through it (or 3rd
> party code built with MSVC). It is even more broken on win64.
Well, to be more correct here. For x64 (there is no win64 btw) there
is
On 3/22/2013 11:26, K. Frank wrote:
>
>> If you're interested in a binary compatibility topic that might affect you --
>> and since you so kindly brought the mingw community in -- be careful about
>> the
>> C++ exception model from your mingw compiler. They are binary-incompatible
>> with one ano
11 matches
Mail list logo