On 27 Jun 2020, at 02:44, Tom Stellard via Release-testers
wrote:
>
> I've tagged the 10.0.1-rc2 release, please test the release and report any
> issues.
For this rc, I used four patches, which are attached.
Main results on amd64-freebsd11:
Expected Passes: 68020
Passes With Retry
On 8 Jul 2020, at 06:08, Tom Stellard via Release-testers
wrote:
> I've tagged 10.0.1-rc4, please test and report the results.
For this rc, I used four patches, which are attached.
Main results on amd64-freebsd11:
Expected Passes: 67554
Passes With Retry : 1
Expected Failures : 265
On 21 Jul 2020, at 07:25, Tom Stellard via Release-testers
wrote:
>
> I've tagged 10.0.1-final. Testers, please begin uploading your binaries.
For the final build, I used four patches, which are attached. (Yes, I am
slowly, very slowly, working on getting these into the tree. :)
Main results
On 28 Jul 2020, at 19:49, Hans Wennborg via Release-testers
wrote:
>
> We're a little bit behind schedule, but RC1 is now here. It was tagged
> earlier today as llvmorg-11.0.0-rc1.
For this rc1, I used two patches, which are attached. (Yes, I am
slowly, very slowly, working on getting these int
On 20 Aug 2020, at 22:34, Hans Wennborg via Release-testers
wrote:
>
> The llvmorg-11.0.0-rc2 tag was just created.
This rc2, I could finally build and test without adding any patches! :)
Main results on amd64-freebsd11:
Unsupported: 5121 (rc1: 5121)
Passed : 69739 (
On 22 Sep 2020, at 17:12, Hans Wennborg via Release-testers
wrote:
>
> After some delay, the llvmorg-11.0.0-rc3 tag was just created.
This rc3, like rc2, I could finally build and test without adding any
patches! :)
Main results on amd64-freebsd11:
Unsupported: 5122 (rc2: 5121)
On 30 Sep 2020, at 20:07, Hans Wennborg via Release-testers
wrote:
>
> We had to pick up another bug fix, so here is another release
> candidate: llvmorg-11.0.0-rc5 tag was just created.
I've built both rc4 and rc5, and again these did not need any patches.
Main results on amd64-freebsd11:
On 7 Oct 2020, at 16:40, Hans Wennborg via Release-testers
wrote:
>
> A few more issues appeared, so here is yet another release candidate:
> llvmorg-11.0.0-rc6 was just tagged.
I've built rc6, and again this did not need any patches.
Main results on amd64-freebsd11:
Unsupported: 5
On 26 Nov 2020, at 08:21, Tom Stellard via Release-testers
wrote:
>
> I've tagged LLVM 11.0.1-rc1. Testers may begin testing and uploading
> binaries. If you still have bugs you want fixed in LLVM 11.0.1, you have
> until Dec. 8 to request backports. You can make these requests by filing a
On 19 Dec 2020, at 07:33, Tom Stellard via Release-testers
wrote:
>
> I've just tagged LLVM 11.0.1-rc2, hopefully this will be the last release
> candidate. Testers can begin testing and uploading binaries.
For 11.0.1 rc2, I have built and tested on both FreeBSD 11 and 12 this
time. No additi
On 6 Jan 2021, at 04:21, Tom Stellard via Release-testers
wrote:
>
> I've tagged LLVM 11.0.1-final. Testers can upload the final binaries now.
For 11.0.1 release, I have built and tested on both FreeBSD 11 and 12
this time. No additional patches were needed.
Main results on amd64-freebsd11:
On 14 Jan 2021, at 02:46, Tom Stellard via Release-testers
wrote:
>
> LLVM 11.1.0-rc1 has been tagged. This is a special release with a
> libclang.so ABI fix to ensure libclang.so remains compatible with LLVM 10 and
> LLVM 12. Testers may begin testing and upload binaries.
For 11.1.0 rc1, I
On 8 Feb 2021, at 18:14, Tom Stellard via Release-testers
wrote:
>
> I've tagged LLVM 11.1.0-rc3. If there are no issues, then I'll be tagging
> the final release in 1 week. Testers please test and upload binaries.
For 11.1.0 rc3, I have built and tested on both FreeBSD 11 and 12 again.
No ad
On 28 Jan 2021, at 05:05, Tom Stellard via llvm-dev
wrote:
>
> I've tagged the 12.0.0-rc1 release. Testers can begin testing and upload
> binaries.
During 12.0.0-rc1 test builds on FreeBSD, I encountered this unittest failure,
which turned out to be caused by recent libc++ changes:
FAILED
On 28 Jan 2021, at 05:05, Tom Stellard via llvm-dev
wrote:
>
> I've tagged the 12.0.0-rc1 release. Testers can begin testing and upload
> binaries.
For 12.0.0 rc1, I have built and tested on both FreeBSD 11 and 12. I
used two patches, which are attached.
Main results on amd64-freebsd11:
On 19 Feb 2021, at 19:14, Tom Stellard wrote:
>
> On 2/13/21 1:44 PM, Louis Dionne wrote:
>>> On Feb 13, 2021, at 12:04, Dimitry Andric wrote:
>>> On 28 Jan 2021, at 05:05, Tom Stellard via llvm-dev
>>> wrote:
I've tagged the 12.0.0-rc1 release. Testers can begin testing and uploa
On 18 Feb 2021, at 05:06, Tom Stellard via Release-testers
wrote:
>
> I've tagged 11.1.0-final, testers may begin uploading binaries now.
For 11.1.0 final, I have built and tested on both FreeBSD 11 and 12
again. No additional patches were needed.
Main results on amd64-freebsd11:
Unsupport
On 24 Feb 2021, at 05:45, Tom Stellard via Release-testers
wrote:
> LLVM 12.0.0-rc2 has been tagged. Please test and report any issues in
> bugzilla.
For 12.0.0 rc2, I have built and tested on both FreeBSD 11 and 12. No
additional patches were needed anymore (i.e. fixes for both issues I
found
On 10 Mar 2021, at 16:10, Tom Stellard via Release-testers
wrote:
>
> I've tagged LLVM 12.0.0-rc3. Testers may begin testing and uploading
> binaries.
> If all goes well, this will be the last RC.
For 12.0.0 rc3, I have built and tested on both FreeBSD 11 and 12. No
additional patches were ne
On 8 Apr 2021, at 03:44, Tom Stellard via Release-testers
wrote:
>
> I've tagged 12.0.0-rc5, testers can begin testing and upload binaries.
For 12.0.0 rc5, I have built and tested on both FreeBSD 11 and 12. No
additional patches were needed.
Main results on amd64-freebsd11:
Unsupported
On 26 May 2021, at 09:15, Tom Stellard via Release-testers
wrote:
>
> I've tagged the 12.0.1-rc1 release. Testers may upload binaries and report
> results.
For 12.0.1 rc1, I have built and tested on both FreeBSD 11 and 12. No
additional patches were needed.
Main results on amd64-freebsd11:
On 17 Jun 2021, at 08:53, Tom Stellard via Release-testers
wrote:
>
> I've tagged the 12.0.1-rc2 release, so testers may begin testing and uploading
> binaries.
For 12.0.1 rc2, I have built and tested on both FreeBSD 11 and 12. No
additional patches were needed.
Main results on amd64-freebsd1
On 26 Jun 2021, at 07:49, Tom Stellard via cfe-dev
wrote:
>
> I've tagged the 12.0.1-rc3 release. Testers please test and upload binaries.
For 12.0.1 rc3, I have built and tested on both FreeBSD 11 and 12. No
additional patches were needed.
Main results on amd64-freebsd11:
Unsupported
On 2 Jul 2021, at 22:59, Tom Stellard via Release-testers
wrote:
>
> I've tagged the 12.0.1-rc4 release. This will hopefully be the last release
> candidate. Please test and upload binaries.
For 12.0.1 rc4, I have built and tested on both FreeBSD 11 and 12. No
additional patches were needed.
On 3 Aug 2021, at 09:20, Tom Stellard via Release-testers
wrote:
>
> I've tagged the 13.0.0-rc1 release. Testers, please test and upload binaries.
For 13.0.0 rc1, I have built and tested on both FreeBSD 12 and 13. I
used 6 patches, which are attached. (Most of these are already merged
for the
On 27 Aug 2021, at 07:20, Tom Stellard via Release-testers
wrote:
>
> I've tagged the 13.0.0-rc2 release. Testers can begin testing and uploading
> binaries.
>
> 13.0.0-rc3 is scheduled to be released on Sep. 7, so we'll continue to accept
> bug fixes in the branch until then.
For 13.0.0 rc2,
On 14 Sep 2021, at 06:40, Tom Stellard via Release-testers
wrote:
>
> I've tagged 13.0.0-rc3. This will likely be the last rc unless there are
> critical bugs that are found. Please test the release and report results.
For 13.0.0 rc3, I have built and tested on both FreeBSD 12 and 13. No
addi
On 25 Sep 2021, at 07:53, Tom Stellard via Release-testers
wrote:
>
> I've tagged 13.0.0-rc4. Please test and upload binaries. If all goes well,
> we
> will release 13.0.0-final in ~1 week.
For 13.0.0 rc4, I have built and tested on both FreeBSD 12 and 13. No
additional patches were needed,
On 30 Nov 2021, at 07:07, Tom Stellard via llvm-dev
wrote:
>
> I've tagged 13.0.1-rc1. Testers can begin testing and uploading binaries.
For 13.0.1 rc1, I have built and tested on both FreeBSD 12 and 13. No
additional patches were needed.
For the 32-builds I used -no-flang, as flang is curren
Hm, it does not seem to compile at all here? The build ends with:
In file included from
/home/dim/llvm-3.7.0/rc3/llvm.src/tools/clang/tools/extra/clang-apply-replacements/lib/Tooling/ApplyReplacements.cpp:17:
/home/dim/llvm-3.7.0/rc3/llvm.src/tools/clang/tools/extra/clang-apply-replacements/lib/
Strangely, the clang-tools-extra stuff does build if I manually check it out
like so (without any symlinks):
.<--
https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/branches/release_37
tools/clang <--
https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/branches/release_37
tools/clang
t-release.sh script, and having clang-tools-extra?
-Dimitry
> On 21 Aug 2015, at 14:09, Dimitry Andric via lldb-dev
> wrote:
>
> Strangely, the clang-tools-extra stuff does build if I manually check it out
> like so (without any symlinks):
>
> .<--
ooling/../../../..
> total 12
> drwxr-xr-x 16 dim dim 4096 2015-08-22 18:17:16 cfe.src/
> drwxr-xr-x 14 dim dim 4096 2015-08-22 18:40:32 clang-tools-extra.src/
> drwxr-xr-x 16 dim dim 4096 2015-08-22 18:13:58 llvm.src/
>
> Of course at a level even below that, there is little c
gt;> goes back to the top level, where *.src is checked out:
>>
>> $ ls -l
>> ~/foo/llvm.src/tools/clang/tools/extra/clang-apply-replacements/lib/Tooling/../../../..
>> total 12
>> drwxr-xr-x 16 dim dim 4096 2015-08-22 18:17:16 cfe.src/
>> drwxr-xr-x 14 dim dim 40
gt; total 16
>>> -rw-r--r-- 1 dim dim 8983 2015-08-22 18:17:18 ApplyReplacements.cpp
>>> -rw-r--r-- 1 dim dim 526 2015-08-22 18:17:18 Makefile
>>> $ ls -l
>>> ~/foo/llvm.src/tools/clang/tools/extra/clang-apply-replacements/lib/Tooling/../../../../../include
>
dim dim 27 2015-08-22 18:53:04
>>>> /home/dim/foo/cfe.src/tools/extra -> ../../clang-tools-extra.src/
>>>> $ ls -l
>>>> ~/foo/llvm.src/tools/clang/tools/extra/clang-apply-replacements/lib/Tooling
>>>> total 16
>>>> -rw-r--r--
Hans,
Note that the patches I posted solved the problems, at least for me. :)
-Dimitry
> On 25 Aug 2015, at 01:40, Hans Wennborg wrote:
>
> It seems this is a cmake vs autoconf thing. With cmake, it builds
> correctly, but with autoconf I get the same error as you.
>
> I probably shouldn't ha
No build or test failures. Uploaded:
SHA256 (clang+llvm-3.7.0-rc4-i386-unknown-freebsd10.tar.xz) =
4d1cc01c701d453b5ddb64801b9014d2f902b08b6834d97878bf8feada56a8c5
SHA256 (clang+llvm-3.7.0-rc4-amd64-unknown-freebsd10.tar.xz) =
2a9feef3004e5787019ee41afc8efa7fbe84ff9621f26a083218d383f6a50802
-D
On 28 Aug 2015, at 20:12, Hans Wennborg wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 6:46 PM, Hans Wennborg wrote:
>> I have promoted RC4 to final; 3.7.0 has reached its final state.
>>
>> Thanks for all your hard work so far. Please build and upload binaries
>> with "-final", and let's ship this next we
101 - 139 of 139 matches
Mail list logo
