It's building with this patch now, already at Phase3, so it seems to work:
Index: trunk/utils/release/test-release.sh
===================================================================
--- trunk/utils/release/test-release.sh (revision 245679)
+++ trunk/utils/release/test-release.sh (working copy)
@@ -266,43 +268,36 @@
check_valid_urls
for proj in $projects ; do
- if [ -d $proj.src ]; then
- echo "# Reusing $proj $Release-$RC sources"
+ case $proj in
+ llvm|openmp)
+ projsrc=$proj.src
+ ;;
+ cfe)
+ projsrc=llvm.src/tools/clang
+ ;;
+ clang-tools-extra)
+ projsrc=llvm.src/tools/clang/tools/extra
+ ;;
+ compiler-rt|libcxx|libcxxabi|libunwind|test-suite)
+ projsrc=llvm.src/projects/$proj
+ ;;
+ *)
+ echo "error: unknown project $proj"
+ exit 1
+ ;;
+ esac
+
+ if [ -d $projsrc ]; then
+ echo "# Reusing $proj $Release-$RC sources in $projsrc"
continue
fi
- echo "# Exporting $proj $Release-$RC sources"
- if ! svn export -q $Base_url/$proj/$ExportBranch $proj.src ; then
+ echo "# Exporting $proj $Release-$RC sources to $projsrc"
+ if ! svn export -q $Base_url/$proj/$ExportBranch $projsrc ; then
echo "error: failed to export $proj project"
exit 1
fi
done
- echo "# Creating symlinks"
- cd $BuildDir/llvm.src/tools
- if [ ! -h clang ]; then
- ln -s ../../cfe.src clang
- fi
- cd $BuildDir/cfe.src/tools
- if [ ! -h extra ]; then
- ln -s ../../clang-tools-extra.src extra
- fi
- cd $BuildDir/llvm.src/projects
- if [ -d $BuildDir/test-suite.src ] && [ ! -h test-suite ]; then
- ln -s ../../test-suite.src test-suite
- fi
- if [ -d $BuildDir/compiler-rt.src ] && [ ! -h compiler-rt ]; then
- ln -s ../../compiler-rt.src compiler-rt
- fi
- if [ -d $BuildDir/libcxx.src ] && [ ! -h libcxx ]; then
- ln -s ../../libcxx.src libcxx
- fi
- if [ -d $BuildDir/libcxxabi.src ] && [ ! -h libcxxabi ]; then
- ln -s ../../libcxxabi.src libcxxabi
- fi
- if [ -d $BuildDir/libunwind.src ] && [ ! -h libunwind ]; then
- ln -s ../../libunwind.src libunwind
- fi
-
cd $BuildDir
}
-Dimitry
> On 22 Aug 2015, at 18:54, Dimitry Andric via llvm-dev
> <llvm-...@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
> The problem seems to be caused by the way the symlinks are setup in
> test-release.sh, e.g. like so:
>
> llvm.src/tools/clang -> ../../cfe.src
> cfe.src/tools/extra -> ../../clang-tools-extra.src
>
> When it then tries to access the path
> llvm.src/tools/clang/tools/extra/clang-apply-replacements/lib/Tooling/../../../../../include,
> it fails. I tried this on both FreeBSD, OSX and Linux, but it fails
> everywhere.
>
> For example, on Linux:
>
> $ ls -l ~/foo/llvm.src/tools/clang
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 dim dim 13 2015-08-22 18:40:16
> /home/dim/foo/llvm.src/tools/clang -> ../../cfe.src/
> $ ls -l ~/foo/cfe.src/tools/extra
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 dim dim 27 2015-08-22 18:53:04 /home/dim/foo/cfe.src/tools/extra
> -> ../../clang-tools-extra.src/
> $ ls -l
> ~/foo/llvm.src/tools/clang/tools/extra/clang-apply-replacements/lib/Tooling
> total 16
> -rw-r--r-- 1 dim dim 8983 2015-08-22 18:17:18 ApplyReplacements.cpp
> -rw-r--r-- 1 dim dim 526 2015-08-22 18:17:18 Makefile
> $ ls -l
> ~/foo/llvm.src/tools/clang/tools/extra/clang-apply-replacements/lib/Tooling/../../../../../include
> ls: cannot access
> /home/dim/foo/llvm.src/tools/clang/tools/extra/clang-apply-replacements/lib/Tooling/../../../../../include:
> No such file or directory
>
> Note that
> llvm.src/tools/clang/tools/extra/clang-apply-replacements/lib/Tooling/../../../..
> goes back to the top level, where *.src is checked out:
>
> $ ls -l
> ~/foo/llvm.src/tools/clang/tools/extra/clang-apply-replacements/lib/Tooling/../../../..
> total 12
> drwxr-xr-x 16 dim dim 4096 2015-08-22 18:17:16 cfe.src/
> drwxr-xr-x 14 dim dim 4096 2015-08-22 18:40:32 clang-tools-extra.src/
> drwxr-xr-x 16 dim dim 4096 2015-08-22 18:13:58 llvm.src/
>
> Of course at a level even below that, there is little chance of an include
> directory existing. How does anybody else manage to build using the
> test-release.sh script, and having clang-tools-extra?
>
> -Dimitry
>
>> On 21 Aug 2015, at 14:09, Dimitry Andric via lldb-dev
>> <lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>>
>> Strangely, the clang-tools-extra stuff does build if I manually check it out
>> like so (without any symlinks):
>>
>> . <--
>> https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/branches/release_37
>> tools/clang <--
>> https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/branches/release_37
>> tools/clang/tools/extra <--
>> https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/clang-tools-extra/branches/release_37
>>
>> I'll investigate, because it would be nice to have those tools.
>>
>> -Dimitry
>>
>>> On 21 Aug 2015, at 13:42, Nikola Smiljanic <popiz...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Dmitry, if I understood Hans clang-extra wasn't part of the build prior
>>> to rc3. Just delete it and run script with --no-checkout.
>>>
>>> On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 7:15 PM, Dimitry Andric <dimi...@andric.com> wrote:
>>> Hm, it does not seem to compile at all here? The build ends with:
>>>
>>> In file included from
>>> /home/dim/llvm-3.7.0/rc3/llvm.src/tools/clang/tools/extra/clang-apply-replacements/lib/Tooling/ApplyReplacements.cpp:17:
>>> /home/dim/llvm-3.7.0/rc3/llvm.src/tools/clang/tools/extra/clang-apply-replacements/lib/Tooling/../../include/clang-apply-replacements/Tooling/ApplyReplacements.h:19:10:
>>> fatal error: 'clang/Tooling/Refactoring.h' file not found
>>> #include "clang/Tooling/Refactoring.h"
>>> ^
>>> 1 error generated.
>>>
>>> Any idea? I had no problems at all with -rc2.
>>>
>>> -Dimitry
>>>
>>>> On 21 Aug 2015, at 02:51, Hans Wennborg <h...@chromium.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hello everyone,
>>>>
>>>> 3.7-rc3 has just been tagged. Testers, please test, build binaries,
>>>> upload to the sftp and report results to this thread.
>>>>
>>>> Again, a lot of patches got merged between rc2 and rc3, but hopefully
>>>> nothing that should upset things.
>>>>
>>>> One thing that did change is that the release script now correctly
>>>> symlinks clang-tools-extra into the build. If this causes problems on
>>>> your platform, please just remove it.
>>>>
>>>> This is a release candidate in the real sense: at this point I have
>>>> zero release blockers on my radar. I will now only accept fixes for
>>>> critical regressions, and if nothing comes up, rc3 will be promoted to
>>>> 3.7.0-final.
>>>>
>>>> Documentation and release note patches are still welcome all the way
>>>> up until the final tag goes in.
>>>>
>>>> Issues that were on my radar, but I don't consider blocking:
>>>>
>>>> - Sanitizer test failures on various platforms, e.g. PR24222. We never
>>>> ran these tests in previous releases, so it's not a regression. It
>>>> would be great if the sanitizer folks could look into the test
>>>> failures, but it's not blocking 3.7.
>>>>
>>>> - PR24273: "[ARM] Libc++abi built in-tree with libunwind fails in
>>>> __cxa_allocate_exception", Renato will exclude libc++ from his build
>>>> for now.
>>>>
>>>> - Lack of key functions in some Instruction classes causing build
>>>> failures without -fno-rtti
>>>> (http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2015-August/089010.html). No
>>>> patches have been forthcoming, so this will not get fixed for 3.7. At
>>>> least we correctly report -fno-rtti in llvm-config built with CMake
>>>> now.
>>>>
>>>> - r244221: "[SPARC] Don't compare arch name as a string, use the enum
>>>> instead", owner is unresponsive.
>>>>
>>>> - "[lldb] r245020 - [MIPS]Handle floating point and aggregate return
>>>> types in SysV-mips [32 bit] ABI", owner is unresponsive.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Hans
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> lldb-dev mailing list
>> lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org
>> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> llvm-...@lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
