Re: [lldb-dev] Adding DWARF5 accelerator table support to llvm

2018-06-14 Thread Pavel Labath via lldb-dev
Thank you all. I am going to try to reply to all comments in a single email. Regarding the .apple_objc idea, I am afraid the situation is not as simple as just flipping a switch. (If it was, I don't think I would have embarked on this adventure in the first place -- I would just emit .apple_*** e

Re: [lldb-dev] Adding DWARF5 accelerator table support to llvm

2018-06-13 Thread Greg Clayton via lldb-dev
> On Jun 13, 2018, at 11:18 AM, Jonas Devlieghere via lldb-dev > wrote: > > Hi Pavel, > >> On Jun 13, 2018, at 6:56 AM, Pavel Labath > > wrote: >> >> Hello again, >> >> It's been nearly six months since my first email, so it's a good time >> to recap what has been

Re: [lldb-dev] Adding DWARF5 accelerator table support to llvm

2018-06-13 Thread Jonas Devlieghere via lldb-dev
Hi Pavel, > On Jun 13, 2018, at 6:56 AM, Pavel Labath wrote: > > Hello again, > > It's been nearly six months since my first email, so it's a good time > to recap what has been done here so far. I am happy to report that > stages 1-3 (i.e. producer/consumer in llvm and integration with lldb) >

Re: [lldb-dev] Adding DWARF5 accelerator table support to llvm

2018-06-13 Thread via lldb-dev
.@apple.com; echri...@google.com; > vlesc...@accesssoftek.com; fr...@apple.com > Subject: Re: [lldb-dev] Adding DWARF5 accelerator table support to llvm > > Hello again, > > It's been nearly six months since my first email, so it's a good time > to recap what has been done

Re: [lldb-dev] Adding DWARF5 accelerator table support to llvm

2018-06-13 Thread David Blaikie via lldb-dev
Nice! Thanks for the update: re: ObjC: Perhaps debug_names and .apple_objc could be emitted at the same time to address that issue at least in the short term? As for size impact, have you tested this with fission and compressed debug info enabled? (both in terms of whether debug_names is as compr

Re: [lldb-dev] Adding DWARF5 accelerator table support to llvm

2018-06-13 Thread Pavel Labath via lldb-dev
Hello again, It's been nearly six months since my first email, so it's a good time to recap what has been done here so far. I am happy to report that stages 1-3 (i.e. producer/consumer in llvm and integration with lldb) of my original plan are now complete with one caveat. The caveat is that the

Re: [lldb-dev] Adding DWARF5 accelerator table support to llvm

2018-02-01 Thread Pavel Labath via lldb-dev
On 30 January 2018 at 16:39, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > On Wed, 17 Jan 2018 17:13:36 +0100, Pavel Labath via lldb-dev wrote: >> so I'm writing this email to see if there's anyone >> else interested in this topic, and to try to synchronize our efforts. > > I am sure interested in DWARF-5 .debug_names.

Re: [lldb-dev] Adding DWARF5 accelerator table support to llvm

2018-01-30 Thread Jan Kratochvil via lldb-dev
On Wed, 17 Jan 2018 17:13:36 +0100, Pavel Labath via lldb-dev wrote: > so I'm writing this email to see if there's anyone > else interested in this topic, and to try to synchronize our efforts. I am sure interested in DWARF-5 .debug_names. I wrote its producer+consumer for GDB (but not producing/

Re: [lldb-dev] Adding DWARF5 accelerator table support to llvm

2018-01-17 Thread Robinson, Paul via lldb-dev
> -Original Message- > From: Pavel Labath [mailto:lab...@google.com] > Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2018 8:14 AM > To: jdevliegh...@apple.com; LLVM Dev; LLDB; David Blaikie; Robinson, Paul > Subject: Adding DWARF5 accelerator table support to llvm > > Hello all, > > In

Re: [lldb-dev] Adding DWARF5 accelerator table support to llvm

2018-01-17 Thread Greg Clayton via lldb-dev
> On Jan 17, 2018, at 8:13 AM, Pavel Labath via lldb-dev > wrote: > > Hello all, > > In it was brought up that > there are at least two parties interested in having DWARF5 accelerator > tables implemented, so I'm writing this email to see if there's any

[lldb-dev] Adding DWARF5 accelerator table support to llvm

2018-01-17 Thread Pavel Labath via lldb-dev
Hello all, In it was brought up that there are at least two parties interested in having DWARF5 accelerator tables implemented, so I'm writing this email to see if there's anyone else interested in this topic, and to try to synchronize our efforts. Our int