On 30 January 2018 at 16:39, Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratoch...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Wed, 17 Jan 2018 17:13:36 +0100, Pavel Labath via lldb-dev wrote: >> so I'm writing this email to see if there's anyone >> else interested in this topic, and to try to synchronize our efforts. > > I am sure interested in DWARF-5 .debug_names. I wrote its producer+consumer > for GDB (but not producing/using DW_IDX_DIE_offset as GDB cannot use it). > > >> 1. add .debug_names support to llvm-dwarfdump via the DebugInfo >> library (to enable testing of the table generation) > > FYI FSF binutils readelf can read .debug_names already for some possible > format cross-check (to prevent multiple incompatible implementations). > > >> 2. add .debug_names generation support (not enabled by default) > + >> I also have a very basic implementation of (2), but this is still quite far >> from being upstreamable. > > Originally I expected I will reuse the GDB .debug_names producer for LLVM: > > https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commitdiff;h=437afbb81e3a04cbd933fc534a50c686eaa63b19 > > https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commitdiff;h=8af5c486ea6153bb84b9257def4e5faa4bc72421 > > But I see you were faster. > > > Jan
Thanks for the heads-up. I will study these to make sure we are compatible. PS: I think people who wrote on this thread are CC'ed on the patch already, but in case anyone is interested, I have created <https://reviews.llvm.org/D42740> to implement a unicode-aware case-insensitive hash according to the dwarf spec. _______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
