On Wed, 17 Jan 2018 17:13:36 +0100, Pavel Labath via lldb-dev wrote:
> so I'm writing this email to see if there's anyone
> else interested in this topic, and to try to synchronize our efforts.
I am sure interested in DWARF-5 .debug_names. I wrote its producer+consumer
for GDB (but not producing/using DW_IDX_DIE_offset as GDB cannot use it).
> 1. add .debug_names support to llvm-dwarfdump via the DebugInfo
> library (to enable testing of the table generation)
FYI FSF binutils readelf can read .debug_names already for some possible
format cross-check (to prevent multiple incompatible implementations).
> 2. add .debug_names generation support (not enabled by default)
+
> I also have a very basic implementation of (2), but this is still quite far
> from being upstreamable.
Originally I expected I will reuse the GDB .debug_names producer for LLVM:
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commitdiff;h=437afbb81e3a04cbd933fc534a50c686eaa63b19
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commitdiff;h=8af5c486ea6153bb84b9257def4e5faa4bc72421
But I see you were faster.
Jan
_______________________________________________
lldb-dev mailing list
lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
