Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] [cfe-dev] [3.8 Release] We have branched

2016-01-21 Thread Renato Golin via lldb-dev
On 20 January 2016 at 17:49, Hans Wennborg wrote: > Did you send this before I sent the rc1 email, or what things are you > referring to? :-) Damn it, my filter isn't working as well as I expected! :) Sorry about the noise. --renato ___ lldb-dev mailin

Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] [cfe-dev] [3.8 Release] We have branched

2016-01-20 Thread Hans Wennborg via lldb-dev
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 7:32 AM, Renato Golin wrote: > Hans, Daniel, > > How are things going? It's been 5 days and no word. I'm running the > tests now, just in case, but would be good to know that no one would > be committing to the release candidate 1 tree in the mean time. Did you send this b

Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] [cfe-dev] [3.8 Release] We have branched

2016-01-20 Thread Daniel Sanders via lldb-dev
Sorry for not replying back on this thread. We moved offices over the weekend and I've been busy sorting various things out. I'm currently building rc1 but my most recent build on the release branch had some regressions. I mentioned them on the rc1 thread but to summarize here: * X86 failed ~20

Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] [cfe-dev] [3.8 Release] We have branched

2016-01-20 Thread Renato Golin via lldb-dev
Hans, Daniel, How are things going? It's been 5 days and no word. I'm running the tests now, just in case, but would be good to know that no one would be committing to the release candidate 1 tree in the mean time. cheers, --renato On 15 January 2016 at 15:56, Daniel Sanders via llvm-dev wrote: