On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 7:32 AM, Renato Golin <renato.go...@linaro.org> wrote: > Hans, Daniel, > > How are things going? It's been 5 days and no word. I'm running the > tests now, just in case, but would be good to know that no one would > be committing to the release candidate 1 tree in the mean time.
Did you send this before I sent the rc1 email, or what things are you referring to? :-) > On 15 January 2016 at 15:56, Daniel Sanders via llvm-dev > <llvm-...@lists.llvm.org> wrote: >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: hwennb...@google.com [mailto:hwennb...@google.com] On Behalf >>> Of Hans Wennborg >>> Sent: 15 January 2016 15:52 >>> To: Daniel Sanders >>> Cc: llvm-dev; lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org; openmp-...@lists.llvm.org; cfe- >>> d...@lists.llvm.org >>> Subject: Re: [cfe-dev] [3.8 Release] We have branched >>> >>> Hi Daniel, >>> >>> Thanks for trying out the branch :-) >>> >>> On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 5:30 AM, Daniel Sanders >>> <daniel.sand...@imgtec.com> wrote: >>> > Hi Hans, >>> > >>> > I tried the release branch last night and I'm having problems building >>> > it. The >>> problem is that test-suite is now building as part of the Phase[123] builds >>> (because this project contains CMakeLists.txt's now) but cmake 3.0.2 (from >>> Debian Jessie) generates an invalid Makefile. >>> > The error is: >>> > CMakeFiles/test-suite.dir/build.make:112: *** target pattern >>> > contains >>> no '%'. Stop. >>> > CMakeFiles/Makefile2:199: recipe for target 'CMakeFiles/test- >>> suite.dir/all' failed >>> > And the referenced line of the generated makefile is: >>> > test-suite-stamps/test-suite-force-rebuild: /home/das-local/llvm- >>> release-3.8/release/branches_release_38/llvm.src/$<TARGET_FILE:clang> >>> > it looks like cmake isn't fully expanding its generator expressions. >>> > >>> > Looking at my logs, it looks like the test-suite used to configure in >>> > 3.6.2 but >>> didn't build as part of test-release.sh and then 3.7.0 stopped since we had >>> switched to cmake and there was no CMakeLists.txt. >>> > I've always run the test-suite as a separate step as described in >>> http://llvm.org/docs/ReleaseProcess.html. Should we stop creating the >>> projects/test-suite symlink to get back to the behaviour from 3.7.0 or >>> should >>> we do something else? >>> >>> Yes, I made the script stop making the symlink in r257791 and merged >>> it to the branch. Did that not work for you, or were you at an earlier >>> revision? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Hans >> >> I'm at r257773 so it looks like I didn't pick up that change. I'll give it >> another try tonight. _______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
