Hans, Daniel, How are things going? It's been 5 days and no word. I'm running the tests now, just in case, but would be good to know that no one would be committing to the release candidate 1 tree in the mean time.
cheers, --renato On 15 January 2016 at 15:56, Daniel Sanders via llvm-dev <llvm-...@lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: hwennb...@google.com [mailto:hwennb...@google.com] On Behalf >> Of Hans Wennborg >> Sent: 15 January 2016 15:52 >> To: Daniel Sanders >> Cc: llvm-dev; lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org; openmp-...@lists.llvm.org; cfe- >> d...@lists.llvm.org >> Subject: Re: [cfe-dev] [3.8 Release] We have branched >> >> Hi Daniel, >> >> Thanks for trying out the branch :-) >> >> On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 5:30 AM, Daniel Sanders >> <daniel.sand...@imgtec.com> wrote: >> > Hi Hans, >> > >> > I tried the release branch last night and I'm having problems building it. >> > The >> problem is that test-suite is now building as part of the Phase[123] builds >> (because this project contains CMakeLists.txt's now) but cmake 3.0.2 (from >> Debian Jessie) generates an invalid Makefile. >> > The error is: >> > CMakeFiles/test-suite.dir/build.make:112: *** target pattern >> > contains >> no '%'. Stop. >> > CMakeFiles/Makefile2:199: recipe for target 'CMakeFiles/test- >> suite.dir/all' failed >> > And the referenced line of the generated makefile is: >> > test-suite-stamps/test-suite-force-rebuild: /home/das-local/llvm- >> release-3.8/release/branches_release_38/llvm.src/$<TARGET_FILE:clang> >> > it looks like cmake isn't fully expanding its generator expressions. >> > >> > Looking at my logs, it looks like the test-suite used to configure in >> > 3.6.2 but >> didn't build as part of test-release.sh and then 3.7.0 stopped since we had >> switched to cmake and there was no CMakeLists.txt. >> > I've always run the test-suite as a separate step as described in >> http://llvm.org/docs/ReleaseProcess.html. Should we stop creating the >> projects/test-suite symlink to get back to the behaviour from 3.7.0 or should >> we do something else? >> >> Yes, I made the script stop making the symlink in r257791 and merged >> it to the branch. Did that not work for you, or were you at an earlier >> revision? >> >> Thanks, >> Hans > > I'm at r257773 so it looks like I didn't pick up that change. I'll give it > another try tonight. > > Thanks > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > llvm-...@lists.llvm.org > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev _______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
