[lldb-dev] Separating test runner and tests

2015-12-10 Thread Zachary Turner via lldb-dev
Currently our folder structure looks like this: lldbsuite |-- test |-- dotest.py |-- dosep.py |-- lldbtest.py |-- ... |-- functionalities |-- lang |-- expression_command |-- ... etc I've been thinking about organizing it like this instead: lldbsuite |-- test |

Re: [lldb-dev] BasicResultsFormatter - new test results summary

2015-12-10 Thread Todd Fiala via lldb-dev
Checked this in as r255310. Let me know if you find any issues with that, Tamas. You will need '-v' to enable it. Otherwise, it will just print the method name. -Todd On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 2:39 PM, Todd Fiala wrote: > Sure, I can do that. > > Tamas, okay to give more detail on -v? I'll gi

Re: [lldb-dev] BasicResultsFormatter - new test results summary

2015-12-10 Thread Todd Fiala via lldb-dev
Sure, I can do that. Tamas, okay to give more detail on -v? I'll give it a shot to see what else comes out if we do that. -Todd On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 12:58 PM, Zachary Turner wrote: > > > On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 12:54 PM Todd Fiala wrote: > >> Hi Tamas, >> >> >> >> On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at

[lldb-dev] [Bug 25801] New: Arch Linux fails to build python support

2015-12-10 Thread via lldb-dev
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=25801 Bug ID: 25801 Summary: Arch Linux fails to build python support Product: lldb Version: unspecified Hardware: PC OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal

Re: [lldb-dev] BasicResultsFormatter - new test results summary

2015-12-10 Thread Zachary Turner via lldb-dev
On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 12:54 PM Todd Fiala wrote: > Hi Tamas, > > > > On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 2:52 AM, Tamas Berghammer > wrote: > >> HI Todd, >> >> You changed the way the test failure list is printed in a way that now we >> only print the name of the test function failing with the name of the

Re: [lldb-dev] BasicResultsFormatter - new test results summary

2015-12-10 Thread Todd Fiala via lldb-dev
Hi Tamas, On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 2:52 AM, Tamas Berghammer wrote: > HI Todd, > > You changed the way the test failure list is printed in a way that now we > only print the name of the test function failing with the name of the test > file in parenthesis. Can we add back the name of the test c

Re: [lldb-dev] BasicResultsFormatter - new test results summary

2015-12-10 Thread Tamas Berghammer via lldb-dev
HI Todd, You changed the way the test failure list is printed in a way that now we only print the name of the test function failing with the name of the test file in parenthesis. Can we add back the name of the test class to this list? There are 2 reason I am asking for it: * To run only a specif