Checked this in as r255310. Let me know if you find any issues with that, Tamas.
You will need '-v' to enable it. Otherwise, it will just print the method name. -Todd On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 2:39 PM, Todd Fiala <todd.fi...@gmail.com> wrote: > Sure, I can do that. > > Tamas, okay to give more detail on -v? I'll give it a shot to see what > else comes out if we do that. > > -Todd > > On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 12:58 PM, Zachary Turner <ztur...@google.com> > wrote: > >> >> >> On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 12:54 PM Todd Fiala <todd.fi...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi Tamas, >>> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 2:52 AM, Tamas Berghammer < >>> tbergham...@google.com> wrote: >>> >>>> HI Todd, >>>> >>>> You changed the way the test failure list is printed in a way that now >>>> we only print the name of the test function failing with the name of the >>>> test file in parenthesis. Can we add back the name of the test class to >>>> this list? >>>> >>> >>> Sure. I originally planned to have that in there but there was some >>> discussion about it being too much info. I'm happy to add that back. >>> >> Can we have it tied to verbosity level? We have -t and -v, maybe one of >> those could trigger more detail in the summary view. >> > > > > -- > -Todd > -- -Todd
_______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
