Sure, I can do that. Tamas, okay to give more detail on -v? I'll give it a shot to see what else comes out if we do that.
-Todd On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 12:58 PM, Zachary Turner <ztur...@google.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 12:54 PM Todd Fiala <todd.fi...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi Tamas, >> >> >> >> On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 2:52 AM, Tamas Berghammer <tbergham...@google.com >> > wrote: >> >>> HI Todd, >>> >>> You changed the way the test failure list is printed in a way that now >>> we only print the name of the test function failing with the name of the >>> test file in parenthesis. Can we add back the name of the test class to >>> this list? >>> >> >> Sure. I originally planned to have that in there but there was some >> discussion about it being too much info. I'm happy to add that back. >> > Can we have it tied to verbosity level? We have -t and -v, maybe one of > those could trigger more detail in the summary view. > -- -Todd
_______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
