The frame may be small, so SimpleRTPSink packs several frames into a
single packet. That's right, I wish it to do so. I have nevertheless
troubles to realize, how to make SimpleRTPSink flush its packets in a
time manner, after for example the first frame of a packet has 10ms
overdue time. I
> I am using SimpleRTPSink with my frame source (based on FramedSource).
By this I hope you mean "a subclass of FramedSource".
> The frame may be small, so SimpleRTPSink packs several frames into a single
> packet. That's right, I wish it to do so. I have nevertheless troubles to
> realize, ho
Thanks for your response, Ross. I am not using the library through multiple
threads - yet I am seeing the packet numbers out of order.
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 2:21 AM, Ross Finlayson wrote:
> While most of the packets are sent in sequence, a few are delivered out of
>> sequence.
>>
>
> You are m
While most of the packets are sent in sequence, a few are delivered
out of sequence.
You are mistaken. Because the code runs in a single thread, packets
for each output stream will be sent in the proper order.
(The only reason I can think of why you might be seeing what you're
describing is
I have the RTP packets on my UNIX SOCKET. I want read them and send
them to my sinks!
So, I have a question:
I must work on multiframedrtpsink.cpp or on rtpsink.cpp?
You don't need to 'work on' either of these.
To receive RTP packets from your socket, you should create a
"Groupsock" object (w
