Hi Vineet,
> -Original Message-
> From: Vineet Gupta
> Sent: Monday, January 16, 2017 11:58 PM
> To: linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org; Alexey Brodkin
>
> Cc: linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; Vineet Gupta
> Subject: [PATCH 3/4] ARCv2: smp: MCIP: remove debug aid to halt all cores
> when on
Hi Vineet,
> -Original Message-
> From: Vineet Gupta
> Sent: Monday, January 16, 2017 11:58 PM
> To: linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org; Alexey Brodkin
>
> Cc: linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; Vineet Gupta
> Subject: [PATCH 2/4] ARC: smp-boot: run-on-reset: add callback to allow non
> maste
Hi Vineet,
> -Original Message-
> From: Vineet Gupta
> Sent: Monday, January 16, 2017 11:58 PM
> To: linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org; Alexey Brodkin
>
> Cc: linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; Vineet Gupta
> Subject: [PATCH 4/4] ARCv2: smp-boot: MCIP: use Inter-Core-Debug unit to
> kick sta
On 01/17/2017 12:58 PM, Alexey Brodkin wrote:
>>
>> +static void arc_default_smp_wait_to_boot(int cpu) {
>> +while (wake_flag != cpu)
>> +;
>> +
>> +wake_flag = 0;
>
> Why don't we convert "wake_flag" into bit-field so each core uses its special
> bit.
> It is IMHO beneficial
On 01/17/2017 01:41 PM, Alexey Brodkin wrote:
>
> Has this one passed checkpatch? Above "{" on the same line as function name
> and closing one merged with the previous line look strange.
Nope - I didn't :-(
I will fix it. Thx for spotting this.
>> + */
>> +if (mp.dbg)
>> +as
On 01/17/2017 02:14 PM, Vineet Gupta wrote:
>> Has this one passed checkpatch? Above "{" on the same line as function name
>> and closing one merged with the previous line look strange.
> Nope - I didn't :-(
> I will fix it. Thx for spotting this.
>
Is there some issue with ur mailer - my patch se
