Hi Vineet,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vineet Gupta
> Sent: Monday, January 16, 2017 11:58 PM
> To: linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org; Alexey Brodkin
> <abrod...@synopsys.com>
> Cc: linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; Vineet Gupta <vgu...@synopsys.com>
> Subject: [PATCH 2/4] ARC: smp-boot: run-on-reset: add callback to allow non
> masters to wait
>
> Currently for halt-on-reset, non masters spin on a shared memory which is
> wiggled by Master at right time. This is not efficient when hardware support
> exists to stop and resume them from Master (using an external IP block).
> More importantly Master might be setting up SLC or IO-Coherency aperutes
> in early boot duting which other cores need NOT perturb the coherency unit,
> thus need a mechanism that doesn't rely on polling memory.
>
> This just adds infrastructure for next patch which will add the hardware
> support (MCIP Inter Core Debug Unit).
>
> Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta <vgu...@synopsys.com>
> ---
> arch/arc/include/asm/smp.h | 3 +++
> arch/arc/kernel/smp.c | 17 +++++++++++++----
> 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arc/include/asm/smp.h b/arch/arc/include/asm/smp.h index
> 0861007d9ef3..6187b9d14b03 100644
> --- a/arch/arc/include/asm/smp.h
> +++ b/arch/arc/include/asm/smp.h
> @@ -50,6 +50,8 @@ extern int smp_ipi_irq_setup(int cpu,
> irq_hw_number_t hwirq);
> * mach_desc->init_early()
> * @init_per_cpu: Called for each core so SMP h/w block driver can do
> * any needed setup per cpu (e.g. IPI request)
> + * @cpu_wait: Non masters wait to be resumed later by
> master (to avoid
> + * perturbing SLC / cache coherency in early boot)
> * @cpu_kick: For Master to kickstart a cpu (optionally at a
> PC)
> * @ipi_send: To send IPI to a @cpu
> * @ips_clear: To clear IPI received at @irq
> @@ -58,6 +60,7 @@ struct plat_smp_ops {
> const char *info;
> void (*init_early_smp)(void);
> void (*init_per_cpu)(int cpu);
> + void (*cpu_wait)(int cpu);
> void (*cpu_kick)(int cpu, unsigned long pc);
> void (*ipi_send)(int cpu);
> void (*ipi_clear)(int irq);
> diff --git a/arch/arc/kernel/smp.c b/arch/arc/kernel/smp.c index
> 44a0d21ed342..e60c11b8f4b9 100644
> --- a/arch/arc/kernel/smp.c
> +++ b/arch/arc/kernel/smp.c
> @@ -96,16 +96,25 @@ static void arc_default_smp_cpu_kick(int cpu,
> unsigned long pc)
> wake_flag = cpu;
> }
>
> +static void arc_default_smp_wait_to_boot(int cpu) {
> + while (wake_flag != cpu)
> + ;
> +
> + wake_flag = 0;
Why don't we convert "wake_flag" into bit-field so each core uses its special
bit.
It is IMHO beneficial for 2 reasons:
1. If we ever decide to have master core with ARCID != 0 implementation of
that procedure won't change,
because "wake_flag" for core with ARCID=0 will be 1 but not 0, see for
example http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/703645/
2. There's no need in resetting "wake_flag" to 0 at all as well because each
core has its own bit and they not affect anybody else.
And in that case ...
> +}
> +
> void arc_platform_smp_wait_to_boot(int cpu) {
> /* for halt-on-reset, we've waited already */
> if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARC_SMP_HALT_ON_RESET))
> return;
...we may just remove above part. Master core by that time has already set our
bit in "wake_flag" so we
will effectively fall through the following "while".
> - while (wake_flag != cpu)
> - ;
-Alexey
_______________________________________________
linux-snps-arc mailing list
linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-snps-arc
