Re: [PATCH RESEND] KEYS: trusted: Use ASN.1 encoded OID

On Thu May 23, 2024 at 8:08 PM EEST, James Bottomley wrote: > On Thu, 2024-05-23 at 11:30 -0400, James Bottomley wrote: > > On Thu, 2024-05-23 at 16:54 +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > > On Thu May 23, 2024 at 4:38 PM EEST, James Bottomley wrote: > > > > On Thu, 2024-05-23 at 16:19 +0300, Jarkko S

Re: [PATCH RESEND] KEYS: trusted: Use ASN.1 encoded OID

On Thu, 2024-05-23 at 11:30 -0400, James Bottomley wrote: > On Thu, 2024-05-23 at 16:54 +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > On Thu May 23, 2024 at 4:38 PM EEST, James Bottomley wrote: > > > On Thu, 2024-05-23 at 16:19 +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > > > There's no reason to encode OID_TPMSealedData

Re: [PATCH RESEND] KEYS: trusted: Use ASN.1 encoded OID

On Thu May 23, 2024 at 6:55 PM EEST, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > I was already considering do we need the encoder at all but I think > for dynamic assets like octect strings and variable size integers > it has its place. Obviously is not very mature at this point. Also, I've been opening up discussio

Re: [PATCH RESEND] KEYS: trusted: Use ASN.1 encoded OID

On Thu May 23, 2024 at 6:43 PM EEST, James Bottomley wrote: > On Thu, 2024-05-23 at 18:37 +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > On Thu May 23, 2024 at 6:30 PM EEST, James Bottomley wrote: > > > On Thu, 2024-05-23 at 16:54 +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > > > On Thu May 23, 2024 at 4:38 PM EEST, James

Re: [PATCH RESEND] KEYS: trusted: Use ASN.1 encoded OID

On Thu, 2024-05-23 at 18:37 +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > On Thu May 23, 2024 at 6:30 PM EEST, James Bottomley wrote: > > On Thu, 2024-05-23 at 16:54 +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > > On Thu May 23, 2024 at 4:38 PM EEST, James Bottomley wrote: > > > > On Thu, 2024-05-23 at 16:19 +0300, Jarkko S

Re: [PATCH RESEND] KEYS: trusted: Use ASN.1 encoded OID

On Thu May 23, 2024 at 6:30 PM EEST, James Bottomley wrote: > On Thu, 2024-05-23 at 16:54 +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > On Thu May 23, 2024 at 4:38 PM EEST, James Bottomley wrote: > > > On Thu, 2024-05-23 at 16:19 +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > > > There's no reason to encode OID_TPMSealedDa

Re: [PATCH RESEND] KEYS: trusted: Use ASN.1 encoded OID

On Thu, 2024-05-23 at 16:54 +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > On Thu May 23, 2024 at 4:38 PM EEST, James Bottomley wrote: > > On Thu, 2024-05-23 at 16:19 +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > > There's no reason to encode OID_TPMSealedData at run-time, as it > > > never changes. > > > > > > Replace it w

Re: [PATCH RESEND] KEYS: trusted: Use ASN.1 encoded OID

On Thu May 23, 2024 at 4:38 PM EEST, James Bottomley wrote: > On Thu, 2024-05-23 at 16:19 +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > There's no reason to encode OID_TPMSealedData at run-time, as it > > never changes. > > > > Replace it with the encoded version, which has exactly the same size: > > > >    

Re: [PATCH RESEND] KEYS: trusted: Use ASN.1 encoded OID

On Thu, 2024-05-23 at 16:19 +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > There's no reason to encode OID_TPMSealedData at run-time, as it > never changes. > > Replace it with the encoded version, which has exactly the same size: > > 67 81 05 0A 01 05 > > Include OBJECT IDENTIFIER (0x06) tag and lengt