Sorry I haven't had the time to dig into the issue but it looks
someone else already fixed it :)
On Thu, 3 Dec 2020 at 21:00, David Blaikie wrote:
>
> This'll hopefully be addressed by https://reviews.llvm.org/D92563
>
> On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 6:28 AM Diana Picus wrote:
>>
>> Ping again. We're
This'll hopefully be addressed by https://reviews.llvm.org/D92563
On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 6:28 AM Diana Picus wrote:
> Ping again. We're seeing this on several aarch64 bots, what can we do
> about it?
>
> On Mon, 23 Nov 2020 at 21:19, David Blaikie via llvm-dev <
> llvm-...@lists.llvm.org> wrote
Ping again. We're seeing this on several aarch64 bots, what can we do about
it?
On Mon, 23 Nov 2020 at 21:19, David Blaikie via llvm-dev <
llvm-...@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> Ping on this - Dan, any chance you could take a look here?
>
> On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 1:48 PM Arthur Eubanks wrote:
> >
> >
Ping on this - Dan, any chance you could take a look here?
On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 1:48 PM Arthur Eubanks wrote:
>
> Another case: http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/43/builds/810
> shtest-timeout.py seems to be fairly flaky on the clang-cmake-aarch64-quick
> bot: http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/buil
Another case: http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/43/builds/810
shtest-timeout.py seems to be fairly flaky on the clang-cmake-aarch64-quick
bot: http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/43, I get notifications from it
fairly often
On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 7:15 PM David Blaikie via llvm-dev <
llvm-...@li
Looks like there might still be some issues with the timeout tests?
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/126/builds/226/steps/13/logs/FAIL__lit___shtest-timeout_py
On Sun, Oct 4, 2020 at 2:44 PM Dan Liew wrote:
> > > One thing we could do to remove fragility in the test is to remove the
> > > run
> > One thing we could do to remove fragility in the test is to remove the
> > running of `short.py` in the test. This is only invoked to check that
> > it's possible for a command to run to completion in the presence of a
> > fixed timeout. If we can live without testing that part (i.e. we only
>
On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 4:31 PM Dan Liew wrote:
>
> On Wed, 16 Sep 2020 at 22:24, David Blaikie wrote:
> >
> > I appreciate the value of the feature - but it's possible the test
> > doesn't pull its weight. Is the code that implements the feature
> > liable to failure/often touched? If it's prett
On Wed, 16 Sep 2020 at 22:32, Mehdi AMINI wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Depending on timing in a test is quite brittle in general: can we mock the
> timeout instead and make this fully deterministic somehow?
>
> The test has this comment:
>
> > FIXME: This test is fragile because it relies on time which can
On Wed, 16 Sep 2020 at 22:24, David Blaikie wrote:
>
> I appreciate the value of the feature - but it's possible the test
> doesn't pull its weight. Is the code that implements the feature
> liable to failure/often touched? If it's pretty static/failure is
> unlikely, possibly the time and flaky f
Hi,
Depending on timing in a test is quite brittle in general: can we mock the
timeout instead and make this fully deterministic somehow?
The test has this comment:
> FIXME: This test is fragile because it relies on time which can
> be affected by system performance. In particular we are current
Hi David,
Unfortunately writing a reliable test is tricky given that the
functionality we're trying to test involves timing. I would advise
against disabling the test entirely because it actually tests
functionality that people use. I'd suggest bumping up the time limits.
This is what I've done in
I appreciate the value of the feature - but it's possible the test
doesn't pull its weight. Is the code that implements the feature
liable to failure/often touched? If it's pretty static/failure is
unlikely, possibly the time and flaky failures aren't worth the value
of possibly catching a low-chan
Ping on this
On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 8:27 PM David Blaikie wrote:
>
> The clang-cmake-armv8-lld (linaro-toolchain owners) buildbot is timing out
> trying to run some timeout tests (Dan Liew author):
>
> Pass: http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-cmake-armv8-lld/builds/5672
> Fail: http://lab.l
The clang-cmake-armv8-lld (linaro-toolchain owners) buildbot is timing out
trying to run some timeout tests (Dan Liew author):
Pass: http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-cmake-armv8-lld/builds/5672
Fail: http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-cmake-armv8-lld/builds/5673
Is there anything we c
15 matches
Mail list logo
