This'll hopefully be addressed by https://reviews.llvm.org/D92563
On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 6:28 AM Diana Picus <diana.pi...@linaro.org> wrote: > Ping again. We're seeing this on several aarch64 bots, what can we do > about it? > > On Mon, 23 Nov 2020 at 21:19, David Blaikie via llvm-dev < > llvm-...@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> Ping on this - Dan, any chance you could take a look here? >> >> On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 1:48 PM Arthur Eubanks <aeuba...@google.com> >> wrote: >> > >> > Another case: http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/43/builds/810 >> > shtest-timeout.py seems to be fairly flaky on the >> clang-cmake-aarch64-quick bot: http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/43, I >> get notifications from it fairly often >> > >> > On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 7:15 PM David Blaikie via llvm-dev < >> llvm-...@lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >> >> >> Looks like there might still be some issues with the timeout tests? >> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/126/builds/226/steps/13/logs/FAIL__lit___shtest-timeout_py >> >> >> >> On Sun, Oct 4, 2020 at 2:44 PM Dan Liew <d...@su-root.co.uk> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> > > One thing we could do to remove fragility in the test is to >> remove the >> >>> > > running of `short.py` in the test. This is only invoked to check >> that >> >>> > > it's possible for a command to run to completion in the presence >> of a >> >>> > > fixed timeout. If we can live without testing that part (i.e. we >> only >> >>> > > test that a timeout can be reached) then the test should be much >> more >> >>> > > robust. >> >>> > >> >>> > If you're on board with that, it's a tradeoff I think is probably >> >>> > reasonable from a test coverage V reliability V development time >> >>> > tradeoff. >> >>> >> >>> Sorry for the delay here. I've put a patch up for review that goes >> >>> with this approach: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88807 >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> LLVM Developers mailing list >> >> llvm-...@lists.llvm.org >> >> https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev >> _______________________________________________ >> LLVM Developers mailing list >> llvm-...@lists.llvm.org >> https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev >> > _______________________________________________ linaro-toolchain mailing list linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain