> > One thing we could do to remove fragility in the test is to remove the > > running of `short.py` in the test. This is only invoked to check that > > it's possible for a command to run to completion in the presence of a > > fixed timeout. If we can live without testing that part (i.e. we only > > test that a timeout can be reached) then the test should be much more > > robust. > > If you're on board with that, it's a tradeoff I think is probably > reasonable from a test coverage V reliability V development time > tradeoff.
Sorry for the delay here. I've put a patch up for review that goes with this approach: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88807 _______________________________________________ linaro-toolchain mailing list linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain
