Re: Plan for changing the binary toolchain to 4.7 and hardfloat

2012-03-19 Thread Michael Hope
On 20 March 2012 01:42, Andrew Stubbs wrote: > I think the "correct" solution to this would be to have the binary toolchain > built in a multilib configuration that supports both softfp and hardfp, and > provide aliases for both triplets that configure the right setting, but that > requires more b

Re: Plan for changing the binary toolchain to 4.7 and hardfloat

2012-03-19 Thread Michael Hope
On 19 March 2012 21:48, Konstantinos Margaritis wrote: > On Sun, 18 Mar 2012 23:27:17 + > Mans Rullgard wrote: >> FWIW, Gentoo has been using arm-hardfloat-linux-gnueabi for hardfloat >> configurations ever since gcc started supporting it.  That's of course >> not a triplet, strictly speaking

Re: Plan for changing the binary toolchain to 4.7 and hardfloat

2012-03-19 Thread Andrew Stubbs
On 19/03/12 08:48, Konstantinos Margaritis wrote: On Sun, 18 Mar 2012 23:27:17 + Mans Rullgard wrote: FWIW, Gentoo has been using arm-hardfloat-linux-gnueabi for hardfloat configurations ever since gcc started supporting it. That's of course not a triplet, strictly speaking. Also fwiw, I

Re: Plan for changing the binary toolchain to 4.7 and hardfloat

2012-03-19 Thread David Rusling
Michael, me too.Can you talk to Steve McKintyre and Konstantinos about this? We've spent the last 12 months trying to get alignment / agreement across all of the distributions on this.arm-linux-gnueabihf is the least worst, agreed option. Dave On 19 Mar 2012, at 08:48, Konsta

Re: Plan for changing the binary toolchain to 4.7 and hardfloat

2012-03-19 Thread Konstantinos Margaritis
On Sun, 18 Mar 2012 23:27:17 + Mans Rullgard wrote: > FWIW, Gentoo has been using arm-hardfloat-linux-gnueabi for hardfloat > configurations ever since gcc started supporting it. That's of course > not a triplet, strictly speaking. Also fwiw, I have been assured from Gentoo developers that t

Re: Plan for changing the binary toolchain to 4.7 and hardfloat

2012-03-18 Thread Mans Rullgard
On 18 March 2012 19:23, Michael Hope wrote: > On 17 March 2012 08:10, Loïc Minier wrote: >> On Fri, Mar 16, 2012, Michael Hope wrote: >>>  https://wiki.linaro.org/MichaelHope/Sandbox/BinariesMigration >> >>  Is there a separate plan for gcc-4.5 deprecation in source releases? > > Yip, I'll send a

Re: Plan for changing the binary toolchain to 4.7 and hardfloat

2012-03-18 Thread Michael Hope
On 17 March 2012 08:10, Loïc Minier wrote: > On Fri, Mar 16, 2012, Michael Hope wrote: >>  https://wiki.linaro.org/MichaelHope/Sandbox/BinariesMigration > >  Is there a separate plan for gcc-4.5 deprecation in source releases? Yip, I'll send an email on that today. >  The triplet situation is sa

Re: Plan for changing the binary toolchain to 4.7 and hardfloat

2012-03-16 Thread Loïc Minier
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012, Michael Hope wrote: > https://wiki.linaro.org/MichaelHope/Sandbox/BinariesMigration Is there a separate plan for gcc-4.5 deprecation in source releases? The triplet situation is sad; is there any hope that we fix this upstream? -- Loïc Minier