On 20 March 2012 01:42, Andrew Stubbs <andrew.stu...@linaro.org> wrote: > I think the "correct" solution to this would be to have the binary toolchain > built in a multilib configuration that supports both softfp and hardfp, and > provide aliases for both triplets that configure the right setting, but that > requires more build, test, and install effort and trickery, and it's not > clear how much benefit there would be.
It's not trivial with the current tools. The loader name changes as well but this isn't critical - we don't need to support more than one distro, just not lock out other uses. > I don't really understand why the compiler name can't just be changed to > match the ABI change though? Upstream GCC recognises arm*-*-linux*-*eabi and not *eabihf. Other packages may be the same. -- Michael _______________________________________________ linaro-toolchain mailing list linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain
