Michael,
me too. Can you talk to Steve McKintyre and Konstantinos about this?
We've spent the last 12 months trying to get alignment / agreement across
all of the distributions on this. arm-linux-gnueabihf is the least worst,
agreed option.
Dave
On 19 Mar 2012, at 08:48, Konstantinos Margaritis wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Mar 2012 23:27:17 +0000
> Mans Rullgard <mans.rullg...@linaro.org> wrote:
>> FWIW, Gentoo has been using arm-hardfloat-linux-gnueabi for hardfloat
>> configurations ever since gcc started supporting it. That's of course
>> not a triplet, strictly speaking.
>
> Also fwiw, I have been assured from Gentoo developers that they will change
> their triplet to arm-linux-gnueabihf as soon as upstream adopts it.
>
> I find the situation sad as well, since Linaro has been pushing for this
> triplet (at least the OCTO team and me personally for more than a year), and
> not having full support from within Linaro with regards to this matter is
> quite depressing. And I have to say, especially one of the arguments (Windows
> storage issue) should be irrelevant for a Linux problem.
>
> Regards
>
> Konstantinos
>
> _______________________________________________
> linaro-dev mailing list
> linaro-...@lists.linaro.org
> http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
_______________________________________________
linaro-toolchain mailing list
linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain
