t.
--
Maxim Kuvyrkov
www.linaro.org
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Maxim Kuvyrkov [mailto:maxim.kuvyr...@linaro.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 8, 2017 10:32 PM
> To: Pinski, Andrew
> Cc: Yao Qi ; Linaro Toolchain
> ; Szabolcs Nagy ;
> Ellcey, Steve
> Subject:
On 7 November 2017 at 13:35, Pinski, Andrew wrote:
> Note gdb patches are located at:
> https://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2017-03/msg00075.html
> https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2017-03/msg00051.html
>
Hi Andrew,
These two patches are the patches Steve sent to us some days ago, and
we've a
rew
Cc: Yao Qi ; Linaro Toolchain
; Szabolcs Nagy ;
Ellcey, Steve
Subject: Re: ILP32 toolchain status update
> On Nov 8, 2017, at 9:03 PM, Pinski, Andrew wrote:
>
> I thought the decision Linaro/Arm was going to take over the development of
> the ILP32?
> What happened to
Toolchain
; Szabolcs Nagy ;
Ellcey, Steve
Subject: Re: ILP32 toolchain status update
On 8 November 2017 at 16:56, Pinski, Andrew wrote:
> What env are you using? Are the glibc versions on the same between ILP32 and
> LP64? Because when that was true I did not have any issues with libthr
[mailto:yao...@linaro.org]
Sent: Wednesday, November 8, 2017 1:16 AM
To: Pinski, Andrew
Cc: Maxim Kuvyrkov ; Linaro Toolchain
; Szabolcs Nagy ;
Ellcey, Steve
Subject: Re: ILP32 toolchain status update
On 7 November 2017 at 13:35, Pinski, Andrew wrote:
> Note gdb patches are located at:
>
> Thanks,
> Andrew
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Yao Qi [mailto:yao...@linaro.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 8, 2017 9:50 AM
> To: Pinski, Andrew
> Cc: Maxim Kuvyrkov ; Linaro Toolchain
> ; Szabolcs Nagy ;
> Ellcey, Steve
> Subject: Re: ILP32 toolchain sta
On 08/11/2017 15:49, Yao Qi wrote:
> On 8 November 2017 at 16:56, Pinski, Andrew wrote:
>> What env are you using? Are the glibc versions on the same between ILP32
>> and LP64? Because when that was true I did not have any issues with
>> libthread_db.
>>
>
> I didn't run gdb tests in ILP32
On 8 November 2017 at 16:56, Pinski, Andrew wrote:
> What env are you using? Are the glibc versions on the same between ILP32 and
> LP64? Because when that was true I did not have any issues with libthread_db.
>
I didn't run gdb tests in ILP32 env, and I don't have such env. I got
gdb.sum fro
On 7 November 2017 at 13:35, Pinski, Andrew wrote:
> Note gdb patches are located at:
> https://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2017-03/msg00075.html
> https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2017-03/msg00051.html
>
>
All these TODOs are given based on the observations of gdb tests result
with these two
Note gdb patches are located at:
https://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2017-03/msg00075.html
https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2017-03/msg00051.html
>2. [GLIBC] LP64 glibc libthread_db does not support ILP32.
No change to glibc was needed to fix this, only the above changes to gdb were
needed
10 matches
Mail list logo
