I thought the decision Linaro/Arm was going to take over the development of the ILP32? What happened to that decision?
Thanks, Andrew -----Original Message----- From: Yao Qi [mailto:yao...@linaro.org] Sent: Wednesday, November 8, 2017 9:50 AM To: Pinski, Andrew <andrew.pin...@cavium.com> Cc: Maxim Kuvyrkov <maxim.kuvyr...@linaro.org>; Linaro Toolchain <linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org>; Szabolcs Nagy <szabolcs.n...@arm.com>; Ellcey, Steve <steve.ell...@cavium.com> Subject: Re: ILP32 toolchain status update On 8 November 2017 at 16:56, Pinski, Andrew <andrew.pin...@cavium.com> wrote: > What env are you using? Are the glibc versions on the same between ILP32 and > LP64? Because when that was true I did not have any issues with libthread_db. > I didn't run gdb tests in ILP32 env, and I don't have such env. I got gdb.sum from Steve on 18 Oct. You are on the cc as well. All my analysis is based on that gdb.sum. > Anyways I did not see some of those failures listed below when using the > correct setup. OK, can you send me a gdb.sum? -- Yao Qi _______________________________________________ linaro-toolchain mailing list linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain
