> On Nov 9, 2017, at 9:44 AM, Pinski, Andrew <andrew.pin...@cavium.com> wrote: > >> Where such a decision was discussed? > > This was discussed back in the end of June. Mark Hambleton of ARM sent a > response to Cavium to that effect.
Hi Andrew, There must have been a miscommunication then. ARM did not ask Linaro to take over development of ILP32. ARM has asked Linaro to produce a binary cross-toolchain from components published on upstream ILP32 branches. Linaro has no current plans to work on ILP32 support in binutils/gdb/glibc. We do plan to finish ILP32 sanitizer support in GCC -- because Adhemerval has the most experience with AArch64/AArch32 sanitizers in ARM ecosystem. Returning to GDB failures, it seems that patches you referenced (posted in March 2017) do not address the debugger deficiencies listed in at the start of this thread. Yao will follow up on that. -- Maxim Kuvyrkov www.linaro.org > > -----Original Message----- > From: Maxim Kuvyrkov [mailto:maxim.kuvyr...@linaro.org] > Sent: Wednesday, November 8, 2017 10:32 PM > To: Pinski, Andrew <andrew.pin...@cavium.com> > Cc: Yao Qi <yao...@linaro.org>; Linaro Toolchain > <linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org>; Szabolcs Nagy <szabolcs.n...@arm.com>; > Ellcey, Steve <steve.ell...@cavium.com> > Subject: Re: ILP32 toolchain status update > >> On Nov 8, 2017, at 9:03 PM, Pinski, Andrew <andrew.pin...@cavium.com> wrote: >> >> I thought the decision Linaro/Arm was going to take over the development of >> the ILP32? >> What happened to that decision? > > Hi Andrew, > > Where such a decision was discussed? > > -- > Maxim Kuvyrkov > www.linaro.org > >> >> Thanks, >> Andrew >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Yao Qi [mailto:yao...@linaro.org] >> Sent: Wednesday, November 8, 2017 9:50 AM >> To: Pinski, Andrew <andrew.pin...@cavium.com> >> Cc: Maxim Kuvyrkov <maxim.kuvyr...@linaro.org>; Linaro Toolchain >> <linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org>; Szabolcs Nagy <szabolcs.n...@arm.com>; >> Ellcey, Steve <steve.ell...@cavium.com> >> Subject: Re: ILP32 toolchain status update >> >> On 8 November 2017 at 16:56, Pinski, Andrew <andrew.pin...@cavium.com> wrote: >>> What env are you using? Are the glibc versions on the same between ILP32 >>> and LP64? Because when that was true I did not have any issues with >>> libthread_db. >>> >> >> I didn't run gdb tests in ILP32 env, and I don't have such env. I got >> gdb.sum from Steve on 18 Oct. You are on the cc as well. All my analysis >> is based on that gdb.sum. >> >>> Anyways I did not see some of those failures listed below when using the >>> correct setup. >> >> OK, can you send me a gdb.sum? >> >> -- >> Yao Qi > _______________________________________________ linaro-toolchain mailing list linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain
