On 9 December 2010 21:51, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
> On 9 Dec 2010, at 15:19, "Julian Brown" wrote:
>> * Load/store multiple instructions: GCC only generates these from
>> load_multiple/store_multiple (from a couple of places where hard
>> registers are already known, e.g. function prol
Hit send accidentally on my last mail. Sorry
On 9 Dec 2010, at 15:19, "Julian Brown" wrote:
> On Thu, 09 Dec 2010 14:42:49 +
> Andrew Stubbs wrote:
>
>> On 26/11/10 11:11, Andrew Stubbs wrote:
>>> As we discussed on Monday, I think it might be helpful to get a
>>> number of knowledgeable
Sent from my iPad
On 9 Dec 2010, at 15:19, "Julian Brown" wrote:
> On Thu, 09 Dec 2010 14:42:49 +
> Andrew Stubbs wrote:
>
>> On 26/11/10 11:11, Andrew Stubbs wrote:
>>> As we discussed on Monday, I think it might be helpful to get a
>>> number of knowledgeable people together on a call
On Thu, 09 Dec 2010 14:42:49 +
Andrew Stubbs wrote:
> On 26/11/10 11:11, Andrew Stubbs wrote:
> > As we discussed on Monday, I think it might be helpful to get a
> > number of knowledgeable people together on a call to discuss GCC
> > optimization opportunities.
> >
> > So, I'd like to get so
On 12/9/2010 6:42 AM, Andrew Stubbs wrote:
> Either Wednesday 15th December at 9am UTC
> Or Thursday 16th 6pm UTC
>
> If selected these times so that Michael can attend. Obviously the former
> is more palatable to Europeans, and the latter allows Americans to join,
> if we have any inte
On 26/11/10 11:11, Andrew Stubbs wrote:
As we discussed on Monday, I think it might be helpful to get a number
of knowledgeable people together on a call to discuss GCC optimization
opportunities.
So, I'd like to get some idea of who would like to attend, and we'll try
to find a slot we can all
Andrew Stubbs wrote:
> * Instruction set coverage.
> - Are there any ARM/Thumb2 instructions that we are not taking
> advantage of? [2]
> - Do we test that we use the instructions we do have? [3]
There is no general frame work to test instruction set coverage. The only
way to find out, r
On 29 November 2010 00:18, Michael Hope wrote:
>
> To add to the mix:
>
> Some ideas that are logged as blueprints:
> Using ARMv5 saturated instructions
> (https://blueprints.launchpad.net/gcc-linaro/+spec/armv5-saturated-ops)
> Using ARMv6 SIMD instructions
> (https://blueprints.launchpad.net/
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 12:11 AM, Andrew Stubbs wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> As we discussed on Monday, I think it might be helpful to get a number of
> knowledgeable people together on a call to discuss GCC optimization
> opportunities.
>
> So, I'd like to get some idea of who would like to attend, and w
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 10:40:34AM -0800, Mark Mitchell wrote:
> As an extension of that idea, and tying into the idea of optimizing for
> size, I suspect that we (a) ought be optimizing for size automatically
> in cold code, and (b) that we're probably not doing a great job of
> optimizing for siz
On 11/26/2010 3:11 AM, Andrew Stubbs wrote:
> As we discussed on Monday, I think it might be helpful to get a number
> of knowledgeable people together on a call to discuss GCC optimization
> opportunities.
I'm not sure I qualify as knowledgeable, and my schedule is a mess, so
please don't try to
11 matches
Mail list logo
