t.
--
Maxim Kuvyrkov
www.linaro.org
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Maxim Kuvyrkov [mailto:maxim.kuvyr...@linaro.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 8, 2017 10:32 PM
> To: Pinski, Andrew
> Cc: Yao Qi ; Linaro Toolchain
> ; Szabolcs Nagy ;
> Ellcey, Steve
> Subject:
On 7 November 2017 at 13:35, Pinski, Andrew wrote:
> Note gdb patches are located at:
> https://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2017-03/msg00075.html
> https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2017-03/msg00051.html
>
Hi Andrew,
These two patches are the patches Steve sent to us some days ago, and
we've a
rew
Cc: Yao Qi ; Linaro Toolchain
; Szabolcs Nagy ;
Ellcey, Steve
Subject: Re: ILP32 toolchain status update
> On Nov 8, 2017, at 9:03 PM, Pinski, Andrew wrote:
>
> I thought the decision Linaro/Arm was going to take over the development of
> the ILP32?
> What happened to
Toolchain
; Szabolcs Nagy ;
Ellcey, Steve
Subject: Re: ILP32 toolchain status update
On 8 November 2017 at 16:56, Pinski, Andrew wrote:
> What env are you using? Are the glibc versions on the same between ILP32 and
> LP64? Because when that was true I did not have any issues with libthr
[mailto:yao...@linaro.org]
Sent: Wednesday, November 8, 2017 1:16 AM
To: Pinski, Andrew
Cc: Maxim Kuvyrkov ; Linaro Toolchain
; Szabolcs Nagy ;
Ellcey, Steve
Subject: Re: ILP32 toolchain status update
On 7 November 2017 at 13:35, Pinski, Andrew wrote:
> Note gdb patches are located at:
>
> Thanks,
> Andrew
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Yao Qi [mailto:yao...@linaro.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 8, 2017 9:50 AM
> To: Pinski, Andrew
> Cc: Maxim Kuvyrkov ; Linaro Toolchain
> ; Szabolcs Nagy ;
> Ellcey, Steve
> Subject: Re: ILP32 toolchain sta
On 08/11/2017 15:49, Yao Qi wrote:
> On 8 November 2017 at 16:56, Pinski, Andrew wrote:
>> What env are you using? Are the glibc versions on the same between ILP32
>> and LP64? Because when that was true I did not have any issues with
>> libthread_db.
>>
>
> I didn't run gdb tests in ILP32
On 8 November 2017 at 16:56, Pinski, Andrew wrote:
> What env are you using? Are the glibc versions on the same between ILP32 and
> LP64? Because when that was true I did not have any issues with libthread_db.
>
I didn't run gdb tests in ILP32 env, and I don't have such env. I got
gdb.sum fro
On 7 November 2017 at 13:35, Pinski, Andrew wrote:
> Note gdb patches are located at:
> https://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2017-03/msg00075.html
> https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2017-03/msg00051.html
>
>
All these TODOs are given based on the observations of gdb tests result
with these two
org] On
Behalf Of Maxim Kuvyrkov
Sent: Tuesday, November 7, 2017 4:40 AM
To: Linaro Toolchain
Cc: Szabolcs Nagy ; Ellcey, Steve
Subject: ILP32 toolchain status update
Over the last couple of months arm64 community and us have tested various
aspects of ILP32 toolchain and, while most of
Over the last couple of months arm64 community and us have tested various
aspects of ILP32 toolchain and, while most of toolchain works as expected,
several features are still missing. Most of the work left is on GDB side,
especially using LP64 GDB to debug ILP32 applications.
1. [GCC] GCC san
11 matches
Mail list logo
