[Libreoffice-qa] QA Admin FDO Ping Stats

2015-01-05 Thread Joel Madero
Hi All, Here is the start of a spreadsheet that can track stats for QA pings. It's not perfect - as it's limited by how bugzilla is limited - but it gives some insight as to how the pings are working out. The spreadsheet auto updates after 6,000 seconds (figured no need for faster ;) ). Requests

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] ping to retest old bugs

2015-01-05 Thread Joel Madero
Hey Terrence, > On Mon, 2015-01-05 at 10:03 -0800, Joel Madero wrote: >> Top posting again: >> >> The mass ping has been done. If I'm poked once a month as a reminder >> I'll do it monthly so that the list is manageable. >> >> here is a link that I believe we can monitor: >> https://bugs.freedeskt

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] ping to retest old bugs

2015-01-05 Thread Terrence Enger
On Mon, 2015-01-05 at 10:03 -0800, Joel Madero wrote: > Top posting again: > > The mass ping has been done. If I'm poked once a month as a reminder > I'll do it monthly so that the list is manageable. > > here is a link that I believe we can monitor: > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/buglist.cgi?bug

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] ping to retest old bugs

2015-01-05 Thread Joel Madero
Top posting again: The mass ping has been done. If I'm poked once a month as a reminder I'll do it monthly so that the list is manageable. here is a link that I believe we can monitor: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/buglist.cgi?bug_status=NEW&chfieldfrom=2015-01-05&chfieldto=Now&email1=qa-admin%40l

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Keyword "bisected"

2015-01-05 Thread Joel Madero
Hi, > Hi, > > On Mon, Jan 05, 2015 at 08:23:20AM -0800, Joel Madero wrote: >> A couple people have told me they use the keyword to indicate that the >> exact (or nearly the exact) commit has been identified. > I use it like that. I don't think this is on the wiki - I'll try to add it. > >> If this

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Keyword "bisected"

2015-01-05 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
Hi, On Mon, Jan 05, 2015 at 08:23:20AM -0800, Joel Madero wrote: > A couple people have told me they use the keyword to indicate that the > exact (or nearly the exact) commit has been identified. I use it like that. > If this is true...it's good to have (and would be another potential easy hack

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Keyword "bisected"

2015-01-05 Thread Alexander Thurgood
Le 05/01/2015 17:23, Joel Madero a écrit : I don't bibisect, much less bisect, so although have seen this in a few bug reports, I haven't been inclined to use it ;-) Alex ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: [email protected]

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Keyword "bisected"

2015-01-05 Thread Andras Timar
Hi Joel, On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 5:23 PM, Joel Madero wrote: > Hi All, > > I just found out that this keyword "bisected" is being used. I'm curious > who is using it and what it is identifying. Also, I'm curious if we > shouldn't move whatever it is being used for to the whiteboard - having > 2 bi

[Libreoffice-qa] Keyword "bisected"

2015-01-05 Thread Joel Madero
Hi All, I just found out that this keyword "bisected" is being used. I'm curious who is using it and what it is identifying. Also, I'm curious if we shouldn't move whatever it is being used for to the whiteboard - having 2 bisect things being in whiteboard, and then 1 in keyword seems strange to m

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] ping to retest old bugs

2015-01-05 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
On Sat, Jan 03, 2015 at 04:37:07PM -0800, Joel Madero wrote: > Suggestions to get around this welcome. Hmm, yeah. For now, I just linked between the two pages, hopeful that this would limit possible confusion. Best, Bjoern ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa