Hi Joel, On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 5:23 PM, Joel Madero <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi All, > > I just found out that this keyword "bisected" is being used. I'm curious > who is using it and what it is identifying. Also, I'm curious if we > shouldn't move whatever it is being used for to the whiteboard - having > 2 bisect things being in whiteboard, and then 1 in keyword seems strange > to me. We have "bibisectRequest" and "bibisected" in whiteboard, then we > have "bisect" in keyword. > > A couple people have told me they use the keyword to indicate that the > exact (or nearly the exact) commit has been identified. If this is > true...it's good to have (and would be another potential easy hack to > move bibisected to bisected), but we need to share this information with > developers so that it's actually useful information. Else, if developers > are just querying for "bibisected" in whiteboard, they are going to miss > bisected in keyword....
I use the bisected keyword to indicate the *exact* commit that caused the regression. For bibisected we use the whiteboard, because we cannot add keywords on freedesktop, but in new TDF bugzilla instance bibisected can be a keyword, too. Regards, Andras _______________________________________________ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: [email protected] Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
