Hi, > Hi, > > On Mon, Jan 05, 2015 at 08:23:20AM -0800, Joel Madero wrote: >> A couple people have told me they use the keyword to indicate that the >> exact (or nearly the exact) commit has been identified. > I use it like that. I don't think this is on the wiki - I'll try to add it. > >> If this is true...it's good to have (and would be another potential easy hack >> to move bibisected to bisected), but we need to share this information with >> developers so that it's actually useful information. Else, if developers are >> just querying for "bibisected" in whiteboard, they are going to miss bisected >> in keyword.... > FWIW, I used it only on bibisected bugs, so at least where I set it, the bug > is > "whiteboard: bibisected keyword: bisected" in the end, so that bisected bugs > are a subset of the bibisected bugs. I added bibisected to the bisected bugs that did not have the whiteboard status. There were 13 so not too bad.
Best, Joel _______________________________________________ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: [email protected] Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
