[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1836701] Re: ubuntu18.04: ipmitool failed: Could not open device at /dev/ipmi0 : No such file or directory

2025-05-09 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Alternatively to just adding dmesg output, you could also run what was requested in comment #6, right after reproducing the problem one more time: apport-collect 1836701 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. h

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1836701] Re: ubuntu18.04: ipmitool failed: Could not open device at /dev/ipmi0 : No such file or directory

2025-05-09 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Coming back to this old bug which showed up in triage because of the "kernel-daily-bug" tag being added, I don't see any dmesg logs. Maybe they can provide a clue? I also note that ubuntu 18.04 Bionic has reached it's end of standard support, and is now covered only by ESM. -- You received this

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2096979] Re: wireless-regdb update problem at Ubuntu 24.04.1 TPM-backed Full Disk Encryption setup

2025-05-07 Thread Andreas Hasenack
> Confirmed wireless-regdb update unblocks `apt upgrade` and works as expected > with the proposed boot- > manged-by-snapd change. Setting verification to done. We have two test plans: a) ubuntu classic b) ubuntu FDE Which of the two test plans was verified? And we then still need a verificatio

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2094190] Re: 2024.10.07 new upstream release

2025-05-07 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Noble also has an autopkgtest failure. It looks like it was infra issues (version="unknown"), so I retriggered it: autopkgtest for linux-gkeop/unknown: amd64: Regression ♻ -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to wireless-regdb in

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2094190] Re: 2024.10.07 new upstream release

2025-05-07 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Please follow this section[1] of the SRU documentation to deal with autopkgtests failures. 1. https://documentation.ubuntu.com/sru/en/latest/explanation/standard-processes/#autopkgtest-failures -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscrib

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2100732] Re: [SRU] Add rt713 & rt1318 LED control

2025-04-30 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Hello Bin, or anyone else affected, Accepted alsa-ucm-conf into plucky-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/alsa-ucm- conf/1.2.12-1ubuntu1.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package.

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2106464] Re: Change the default output volume of headphone for Realtek RT722

2025-04-30 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Hello Chris, or anyone else affected, Accepted alsa-ucm-conf into plucky-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/alsa-ucm- conf/1.2.12-1ubuntu1.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package.

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2106394] Re: [SRU] enable cs42l43 and cs35l56 audio on Intel LNL

2025-04-30 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Hello AaronMa, or anyone else affected, Accepted alsa-ucm-conf into plucky-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/alsa-ucm- conf/1.2.12-1ubuntu1.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new packag

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2106394] Please test proposed package

2025-04-30 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Hello AaronMa, or anyone else affected, Accepted firmware-sof into oracular-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firmware- sof/2024.06-1ubuntu1.4 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new packa

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2106394] Please test proposed package

2025-04-30 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Hello AaronMa, or anyone else affected, Accepted alsa-ucm-conf into oracular-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/alsa-ucm- conf/1.2.10-1ubuntu6.4 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new pack

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2106394] Please test proposed package

2025-04-30 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Hello AaronMa, or anyone else affected, Accepted firmware-sof into noble-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firmware- sof/2023.12.1-1ubuntu1.5 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new packag

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2106394] Please test proposed package

2025-04-30 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Hello AaronMa, or anyone else affected, Accepted alsa-ucm-conf into noble-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/alsa-ucm- conf/1.2.10-1ubuntu5.5 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2100732] Re: [SRU] Add rt713 & rt1318 LED control

2025-04-30 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Please upload this alsa-ucm-conf update to questing as well, as soon as it's open, because right now plucky is "ahead" of questing: alsa-ucm-conf | 1.2.12-1ubuntu1 | questing| source alsa-ucm-conf | 1.2.12-1ubuntu1.1 | plucky/unapproved/e6e521f | source -- You receive

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2100732] Please test proposed package

2025-04-30 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Hello Bin, or anyone else affected, Accepted alsa-ucm-conf into oracular-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/alsa-ucm- conf/1.2.10-1ubuntu6.4 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package.

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2106464] Please test proposed package

2025-04-30 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Hello Chris, or anyone else affected, Accepted alsa-ucm-conf into noble-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/alsa-ucm- conf/1.2.10-1ubuntu5.5 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package.

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2106464] Please test proposed package

2025-04-30 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Hello Chris, or anyone else affected, Accepted alsa-ucm-conf into oracular-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/alsa-ucm- conf/1.2.10-1ubuntu6.4 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new packag

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2100732] Please test proposed package

2025-04-30 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Hello Bin, or anyone else affected, Accepted alsa-ucm-conf into noble-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/alsa-ucm- conf/1.2.10-1ubuntu5.5 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. S

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2106394] Re: [SRU] enable cs42l43 and cs35l56 audio on Intel LNL

2025-04-29 Thread Andreas Hasenack
> the benefits of comprehensive updates which we believe these topology files > for particular Intel platform > (ex. sof-lnl/arl/mtl/...-$(codec_name)-) are signed and verified by Intel > and would be advantageous > in the long run. While I can appreciate that, it's not the topic of this S

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2106394] Re: [SRU] enable cs42l43 and cs35l56 audio on Intel LNL

2025-04-29 Thread Andreas Hasenack
> SOF tplg and alsa-ucm-conf should be the updated together to make audio work. Ok > 6.13+ kernel include plucky should support. Ok, plucky is good then. > oracular SRU had been sent to kernel maillist. What does this mean for this SRU here? It sounds like we can only test it when the oracu

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2106394] Re: [SRU] enable cs42l43 and cs35l56 audio on Intel LNL

2025-04-23 Thread Andreas Hasenack
firmware-sof doesn't have an SRU exception[1] that allows it to add such bulk changes without a specific process. This bug here claims to be enabling just "cs42l43 and cs35l56 audio on Intel LNL", but the commit is far more reaching than that claim. If I look at the previous update[2], only one t

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2100732] Re: [SRU] Add rt713 & rt1318 LED control

2025-04-23 Thread Andreas Hasenack
** Also affects: alsa-ucm-conf (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: alsa-ucm-conf (Ubuntu Oracular) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: alsa-ucm-conf (Ubuntu Plucky) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2106394] Re: [SRU] enable cs42l43 and cs35l56 audio on Intel LNL

2025-04-23 Thread Andreas Hasenack
> Noble/Oracular/Plucky support this platform, Plucky already got the firmware. After doing a check in plucky for a random topology file (I used sof-adl-cs42l43-l0-cs35l56-l23.tplg) and verifying it's there, and given the comment above, marking firmware-sof main and plucky tasks as "fix release

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2106394] Re: [SRU] enable cs42l43 and cs35l56 audio on Intel LNL

2025-04-23 Thread Andreas Hasenack
As requested in comment #9, please provide a better elaborated test plan. See [1] for a reference/explanation. Also, this SRU has many package tasks, are all of them required to fix the bug? Which packages need to be released into updates together? 1. https://documentation.ubuntu.com/sru/en/lat

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2096979] Re: wireless-regdb update problem at Ubuntu 24.04.1 TPM-backed Full Disk Encryption setup

2025-04-16 Thread Andreas Hasenack
How can this bug be "verification-done" if it doesn't even have a test plan? In fact, there is no SRU information in the bug description. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to wireless-regdb in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2082060] Re: memcpy: detected field-spanning write (size 8) of single field "lr + 1"

2025-04-05 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Hi @john-cabaj, thanks for your oracular verification in comment #30. Your statement is only about the oracular verification, though, not noble, so I'm changing the noble verification tags back to verification-needed. ** Tags removed: verification-done-noble ** Tags added: verification-needed-nob

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2057693] Update Released

2025-04-02 Thread Andreas Hasenack
The verification of the Stable Release Update for zfs-linux has completed successfully and the package is now being released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2081678] Update Released

2025-04-02 Thread Andreas Hasenack
The verification of the Stable Release Update for zfs-linux has completed successfully and the package is now being released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2077926] Update Released

2025-04-02 Thread Andreas Hasenack
The verification of the Stable Release Update for zfs-linux has completed successfully and the package is now being released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2082060] Update Released

2025-04-02 Thread Andreas Hasenack
The verification of the Stable Release Update for zfs-linux has completed successfully and the package is now being released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2077926] Re: crash in openzfs - 2.2.2 not supported on 6.8

2025-04-02 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Hello @john-cabaj, thanks for trying out the proposed packages. Unfortunately your verification in comment #14 is missing crucial information. As requested in comment #12: If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you test

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2078720] Re: Upgrading from jammy to noble results in a linux-headers package being in a broken state

2025-03-28 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Hello Ankush, or anyone else affected, Accepted apt into noble-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/2.8.3 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Tes

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2103653] Re: python perf module missing in plucky's kernel

2025-03-19 Thread Andreas Hasenack
It's in the bin:linux-perf package now, but needs a fix. Quick hack (or maybe the real fix): --- /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/perf/__init__.py 2025-03-19 20:34:33.601056393 + +++ __init__.py 2025-03-19 20:34:27.82517 + @@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ # Load the actual python-perf module f

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2103653] [NEW] python perf module missing in plucky's kernel

2025-03-19 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Public bug reported: Regression from https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2051560, but I'm not sure exactly when it happened. root@p-perf:~# uname -a Linux p-perf 6.14.0-10-generic #10-Ubuntu SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Wed Mar 12 16:07:00 UTC 2025 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux root@

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2103653] Re: python perf module missing in plucky's kernel

2025-03-19 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Perhaps last existed in 6.14.0-7? root@p-perf:~# apt-file search /perf | grep /linux-tools- linux-tools-6.14.0-7: /usr/lib/linux-tools-6.14.0-7/lib/perf.cpython-313-x86_64-linux-gnu.so linux-tools-6.14.0-7: /usr/lib/linux-tools-6.14.0-7/perf -- You received this bug notification because you are

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2051560] Re: Provide python perf module

2025-03-19 Thread Andreas Hasenack
This regressed in plucky: root@p-perf:~# uname -a Linux p-perf 6.14.0-10-generic #10-Ubuntu SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Wed Mar 12 16:07:00 UTC 2025 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux root@p-perf:~# python3 -c 'import perf; [print(c) for c in perf.cpu_map()]' Traceback (most recent call last): File "", lin

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2101782] [NEW] memcpy: detected field-spanning write (size 20) of single field "xattrstart"

2025-03-09 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Public bug reported: I created a zfs-encrypted pool at /dev/sda (a 16Gb pendrive), to use it as storage for lxd on this raspberry pi5 with 8Gb of RAM. Creating the pool worked just fine, as did making it a storage for lxd. I then launched a test container, and it hung. ProblemType: Bug DistroRel

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2092701] Update Released

2025-03-07 Thread Andreas Hasenack
The verification of the Stable Release Update for thermald has completed successfully and the package is now being released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2095279] Re: MT7925 controller timeout during Suspend stress test

2025-03-07 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Hi @rickywu, in comment #5 you wrote: > 1. Noble 6.8.0-53-generic with linux-firmware > 20240318.git3b128b60-0ubuntu2.8. It worked fine without any > problem. That is not the correct version of linux-firmware from noble-proposed. noble-proposed has 20240318.git3b128b60-0ubuntu2.10, and noble-up

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2093400] Update Released

2025-03-07 Thread Andreas Hasenack
The verification of the Stable Release Update for linux-firmware has completed successfully and the package is now being released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you enco

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2095334] Update Released

2025-03-07 Thread Andreas Hasenack
The verification of the Stable Release Update for linux-firmware has completed successfully and the package is now being released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you enco

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2084059] Update Released

2025-03-06 Thread Andreas Hasenack
The verification of the Stable Release Update for ipu6-drivers has completed successfully and the package is now being released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encoun

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2084059] Re: OVTI08F4:00: number of CSI2 data lanes 2 is not supported

2025-03-06 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Was this part of the test plan conducted: Full test plan is done via checkbox camera tests by multiple parties. ? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2084059 Title: OVTI0

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2096979] Re: wireless-regdb update problem at Ubuntu 24.04.1 TPM-backed Full Disk Encryption setup

2025-03-06 Thread Andreas Hasenack
** Also affects: wireless-regdb (Ubuntu Oracular) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: boot-managed-by-snapd (Ubuntu Oracular) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: wireless-regdb (Ubuntu Plucky) Importance: Undecided Status: Confirmed **

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2094190] Re: 2024.10.07 new upstream release

2025-03-06 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Adding block-proposed due to https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wireless-regdb/+bug/2096979. Looks like any update of this package will break on tpm+fde systems. ** Tags added: block-proposed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subsc

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2037667] Please test proposed package

2025-03-04 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Hello Danilo, or anyone else affected, Accepted systemd into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/249.11-0ubuntu3.15 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https:

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2009859] Please test proposed package

2025-03-04 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Hello Nick, or anyone else affected, Accepted systemd into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/249.11-0ubuntu3.15 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https://

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2019968] Update Released

2025-03-04 Thread Andreas Hasenack
The verification of the Stable Release Update for qemu has completed successfully and the package is now being released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a reg

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2095334] Re: No sound output from one of the speaker on HP ZBook[cs35l56]

2025-03-04 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Please don't just change the verification tags without a comment stating what your verification was. ** Tags removed: verification-done-oracular ** Tags added: verification-needed-oracular -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to l

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2062667] Update Released

2025-02-09 Thread Andreas Hasenack
The verification of the Stable Release Update for ubuntu-meta has completed successfully and the package is now being released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encount

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2062667] Re: [SRU] Fails on (and should be removed from) raspi desktop

2025-02-09 Thread Andreas Hasenack
I would really like to see https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu- image/+bug/2082947 fixed, it's not just this SRU that it is impacting. That being said, since this fix here is container to arm64, the first part of the test plan was done, and we are about to build images for 24.04.2 release candidates

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2062667] Re: Fails on (and should be removed from) raspi desktop

2025-02-01 Thread Andreas Hasenack
This is missing the SRU template. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to qrtr in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2062667 Title: Fails on (and should be removed from) raspi desktop Status in protection-domain-mapper pac

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2077731] Re: [SRU] riscv64 EDK 2 crashes in KVM based emulation

2025-01-24 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Is qemu still in need for a fix here? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux-meta-riscv in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2077731 Title: [SRU] riscv64 EDK 2 crashes in KVM based emulation Status in edk2 package

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2093077] Update Released

2025-01-23 Thread Andreas Hasenack
The verification of the Stable Release Update for firmware-sof has completed successfully and the package is now being released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encoun

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2089273] Update Released

2025-01-22 Thread Andreas Hasenack
The verification of the Stable Release Update for alsa-ucm-conf has completed successfully and the package is now being released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encou

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1373070] Re: full fix for disconnected path (paths)

2025-01-15 Thread Andreas Hasenack
omprog is quite hard to confine correctly in a way that is still usable for all cases. Whatever you do, it would be best to deal with local overrides, and not change the main profile shipped by the rsyslog package. That being said, I don't know of a way to override the flag: the current override m

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2086250] Re: Adding support for Realtek sof-soundwire audio on Dell GhostRider platform

2025-01-09 Thread Andreas Hasenack
> 2. Make sure firmware-sof, alsa-ucm-conf and kernel version support RT722+RT1320. alsa-ucm-conf is missing the verification on https://launchpad.net/bugs/2089273 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to alsa-ucm-conf in Ubuntu. h

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2085162] Re: Bluetooth devices can't reconnect after reboot or sleep

2025-01-09 Thread Andreas Hasenack
These new test runs now passed and are green. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to bluez in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2085162 Title: Bluetooth devices can't reconnect after reboot or sleep Status in Bluez Utili

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2085162] Update Released

2025-01-09 Thread Andreas Hasenack
The verification of the Stable Release Update for bluez has completed successfully and the package is now being released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a re

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2085162] Re: Bluetooth devices can't reconnect after reboot or sleep

2025-01-08 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Like with other packages I have seen[1] in my shift, there are also tons of "in progress" autopkgtests for this package that don't seem to be running at all, yet are flagged as such in the report. I'll trigger new runs for those: $ ./retry-autopkgtest-regressions -s oracular --state RUNNING --bloc

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2077731] Update Released

2024-12-12 Thread Andreas Hasenack
The verification of the Stable Release Update for edk2 has completed successfully and the package is now being released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a reg

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2084059] Re: OVTI08F4:00: number of CSI2 data lanes 2 is not supported

2024-11-29 Thread Andreas Hasenack
I see ipu6-drivers 0~git202407190257.9369b88e-0ubuntu1.1 in oracular- unapproved[1], and an unanswered question in comment #40 above. Unsubscribing sponsors. 1. https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/oracular/+queue?queue_state=1&queue_text=ipu6-drivers -- You received this bug notification because you

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2077829] Re: Missing CS35L56 sof firmware for Dell Bolan platform

2024-11-14 Thread Andreas Hasenack
a) It looks like the patches are changing many more things than "just" CS35L56 support. I'm not familiar with firmware-sof and these binary files, but that's what it looks like (output truncated below for brevity): $ dquilt push -a Applying patch 0001-Add-2.11-topology2-production-binaries.patch p

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2077829] Re: Missing CS35L56 sof firmware for Dell Bolan platform

2024-11-14 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Confirmed https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firmware- sof/2024.06-1ubuntu2 in plucky-proposed, marking corresponding task as "fix committed" for clarity. ** Changed in: firmware-sof (Ubuntu Plucky) Status: New => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a mem

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2069760] Re: Soundwire support for CS42L43 and CS35L56 on Intel MTL

2024-10-25 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Ok, this is verification-failed then, I'm changing the tag. Thanks for catching this. ** Tags removed: verification-done-noble ** Tags added: verification-failed-noble -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to alsa-ucm-conf in Ubunt

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2069760] Re: Soundwire support for CS42L43 and CS35L56 on Intel MTL

2024-10-25 Thread Andreas Hasenack
>> And with alsa-ucm-conf 2023.12.1-1ubuntu1, there is no sound at all? > > May I know where is the version from? I don't see the version in > noble/oracular/plucky. Oh, sorry, that was firmware-sof. This SRU has 2 packages: firmware-sof, and alsa-ucm-conf. I was querying if the original package

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2069417] Re: Soundwire support for the Intel LNL Gen platforms

2024-10-24 Thread Andreas Hasenack
This upload of firmware-sof is also fixing https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firmware-sof/+bug/2069760, but that verification has not concluded successfully yet (there is no sound coming from the right speaker). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Pack

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2069760] Re: Soundwire support for CS42L43 and CS35L56 on Intel MTL

2024-10-24 Thread Andreas Hasenack
> I test on my Latitude 9510, the right speaker has no sound if I apply the > alsa-ucm-conf 1.2.10- > 1ubuntu5.1. And with alsa-ucm-conf 2023.12.1-1ubuntu1, there is no sound at all? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to alsa-u

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2069417] Re: Soundwire support for the Intel LNL Gen platforms

2024-10-10 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Hi @mschiu77, please don't change the verification tags without a comment demonstrating the verification that was done. >From comment #3 above: > If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, > mentioning the version of the > package you tested, what testing has been

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2069760] Re: Soundwire support for CS42L43 and CS35L56 on Intel MTL

2024-10-10 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Hi @mschiu77, please don't change the verification tags without a comment demonstrating the verification that was done. >From comment #13 above: > If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, > mentioning the version of the > package you tested, what testing has been

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2062568] Re: nfsd gets unresponsive after some hours of operation

2024-10-08 Thread Andreas Hasenack
I'm marking the nfs-utils task as incomplete again, because so far this looks like a kernel issue, and not userspace. ** Changed in: nfs-utils (Ubuntu Noble) Status: Confirmed => Incomplete ** Changed in: nfs-utils (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Incomplete -- You received this bug

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2077487] Re: Broken atime in 2.2.2-0ubuntu9 (noble's version)

2024-10-03 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Hello Jessica, or anyone else affected, Accepted zfs-linux into noble-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/zfs- linux/2.2.2-0ubuntu9.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See ht

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2077487] Re: Broken atime in 2.2.2-0ubuntu9 (noble's version)

2024-09-20 Thread Andreas Hasenack
The current test plan doesn't seem to cover what is described in the impact section. Please update the test plan to include a test for the actual impact this is having, which, from the description, is: This manifests for me on the current (6.8.0-40.40~22.04.3) 22.04 HWE kernel as writes to a f

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2062568] Re: nfsd gets unresponsive after some hours of operation

2024-09-18 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Is anybody in a position to try out the kernel from the ubuntu 24.10 upcoming release? There will be a beta out this week of Ubuntu Oracular 24.10. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2062568] Re: nfsd gets unresponsive after some hours of operation

2024-09-18 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Thanks all for your input. I'll add a kernel task to this bug, but keep the userspace one open for now. ** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in U

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2078720] Re: Upgrading from jammy to noble results in a linux-headers package being in a broken state

2024-09-05 Thread Andreas Hasenack
I was able to reproduce this in jammy lxd VM, and tweaked the test plan a bit. I'm going to accept this into jammy-proposed in order to allow for testing to begin quickly, but we still need the noble and oracular uploads as well. The APT noble test plan could also use some refinement, there are s

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2078720] Please test proposed package

2024-09-05 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Hello Ankush, or anyone else affected, Accepted apt into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/2.4.13 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Te

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2078720] Re: Upgrading from jammy to noble results in a linux-headers package being in a broken state

2024-09-05 Thread Andreas Hasenack
** Description changed: (For APT SRU versioning, see https://wiki.ubuntu.com/AptUpdates) [Impact] Obsolete packages can be removed despite still having reverse dependencies installed, for example: Now that 24.04.1 has been released, 22.04 users are encouraged to upgrade to 24.04 vi

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2078720] Re: Upgrading from jammy to noble results in a linux-headers package being in a broken state

2024-09-05 Thread Andreas Hasenack
** Description changed: (For APT SRU versioning, see https://wiki.ubuntu.com/AptUpdates) [Impact] Obsolete packages can be removed despite still having reverse dependencies installed, for example: Now that 24.04.1 has been released, 22.04 users are encouraged to upgrade to 24.04 vi

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2060101] Re: Enable OV08X40 camera sensor for Intel MTL IPU6 MIPI Camera

2024-08-29 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Hello You-Sheng, or anyone else affected, Accepted usbio-drivers into noble-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/usbio- drivers/0~git202312141918.78ffb706-0ubuntu2.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by te

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2060101] Re: Enable OV08X40 camera sensor for Intel MTL IPU6 MIPI Camera

2024-08-29 Thread Andreas Hasenack
> Install the built dkms binary package and > linux-headers-generic-hwe-22.04/jammy. The dkms build should be >triggered and complete successfully, and the devices with BIOS of 69W or a >newer version should work as > usual. The jammy task of this bug is marked as invalid, but the test plan is

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2060268] Re: Phantom "Unknown Display" shown in Settings after installing the Nvidia driver

2024-08-29 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Finally, and pardon my ignorance, but could /dev/dri/card0 be used for non-graphical things, like servers doing gpu calculations? And in that case, removing it could break that workload? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to nvid

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2060268] Re: Phantom "Unknown Display" shown in Settings after installing the Nvidia driver

2024-08-29 Thread Andreas Hasenack
During boot, when does exactly "/bin/rm /dev/dri/card0" run? Would that run in the initrd environment? I ask because of comment #37, which said they lost the display during the luks password prompt. Although I believe that's because of the workaround they were using then, which was to disable simpl

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2060268] Re: Phantom "Unknown Display" shown in Settings after installing the Nvidia driver

2024-08-29 Thread Andreas Hasenack
This regression potential concerns me, thank you for raising it: """ Removing the simpledrm card is only safe when it's not being used. If somehow a machine wasn't using the installed Nvidia driver then there could be a risk of deleting the only working display. """ It may be obvious to you that

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2016881] Update Released

2024-08-22 Thread Andreas Hasenack
The verification of the Stable Release Update for zfs-linux has completed successfully and the package is now being released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1980848] Update Released

2024-08-22 Thread Andreas Hasenack
The verification of the Stable Release Update for zfs-linux has completed successfully and the package is now being released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2064370] Re: Blank screen after boot in raspberry pi 4

2024-05-01 Thread Andreas Hasenack
** Package changed: software-properties (Ubuntu) => linux-raspi (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux-raspi in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064370 Title: Blank screen after boot in raspberry pi 4 St

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2055283] Re: Intel Bluetooth AX201 needs firmware intel/ibt-0180-4150.sfi

2024-04-25 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Hi, the test plan calls out for two additional steps which I don't see in your verification: > run hciconfig, the hci0 shows up. > run checkbox testcase, it could pass. > [Checkbox job `com.canonical.certification::bluetooth/detect-output` output] Could you please clarify if you have performed

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2052961] Re: Error: OCI runtime error: crun: chmod : Operation not supported

2024-04-12 Thread Andreas Hasenack
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2056442 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056442 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 2056442 Podman (crun) regression in Ubuntu 22.04: OCI runtime error: chmod `run/shm`: Operation not supported -- You received this bug notification becaus

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2060217] Re: NFSv4 fails to mount in noble/s390x

2024-04-11 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Adding a release notes task to put a note under "known issues". ** Also affects: ubuntu-release-notes Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2060217] Re: NFSv4 fails to mount in noble/s390x

2024-04-11 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Marking the userspace component (src:nfs-utils) task as invalid, since it's a bug in the kernel. ** Changed in: nfs-utils (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2060217] Re: NFSv4 fails to mount in noble/s390x

2024-04-10 Thread Andreas Hasenack
That would be https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/fce7913b13d0270bcf926f986b7ef329e2e56eec -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060217 Title: NFSv4 fails to mount in nobl

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2060217] Re: NFSv4 fails to mount in noble/s390x

2024-04-10 Thread Andreas Hasenack
> Could I know the kernel version which use for below test? Search for "testbed running kernel". In the case of that test, it's: 859s autopkgtest [01:53:38]: testbed running kernel: Linux 6.6.0-14-generic #14-Ubuntu SMP Thu Nov 30 09:46:34 UTC 2023 -- You received this bug notification because

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2060217] Re: NFSv4 fails to mount in noble/s390x

2024-04-09 Thread Andreas Hasenack
I have GuoqingJiang access to the s390x vm where this bug can be observed. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060217 Title: NFSv4 fails to mount in noble/s390x Status in Ub

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2060217] Re: NFSv4 fails to mount in noble/s390x

2024-04-09 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Perhaps try an older kernel, from when the test last passed? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060217 Title: NFSv4 fails to mount in noble/s390x Status in Ubuntu on IBM z

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2060217] Re: NFSv4 fails to mount in noble/s390x

2024-04-08 Thread Andreas Hasenack
** Tags added: update-excuse -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060217 Title: NFSv4 fails to mount in noble/s390x Status in linux package in Ubuntu: New Status in nfs-uti

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2060217] Re: NFSv4 fails to mount in noble/s390x

2024-04-08 Thread Andreas Hasenack
I have a VM where this can be reproduced, if anyone is interested. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060217 Title: NFSv4 fails to mount in noble/s390x Status in linux pack

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2060217] Re: NFSv4 fails to mount in noble/s390x

2024-04-08 Thread Andreas Hasenack
> Does running `mount -vvv ...` provide more information? Nope, same as single -v: root@nfs:~# mount /mnt/nfs_home -vvv mount.nfs: timeout set for Mon Apr 8 15:48:10 2024 mount.nfs: trying text-based options 'vers=4.2,addr=127.0.0.1,clientaddr=127.0.0.1' mount.nfs: mount(2): Input/output error

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2060217] Re: NFSv4 fails to mount in noble/s390x

2024-04-08 Thread Andreas Hasenack
** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Description changed: - Just filing the bug now to keep track of it. No troubleshooting done - yet. - https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/n/nfs-utils/noble/s390x Looks like it has been failing for a long tim

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2051199] Update Released

2024-03-07 Thread Andreas Hasenack
The verification of the Stable Release Update for alsa-ucm-conf has completed successfully and the package is now being released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encou

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2051199] Re: Add MediaTek Genio mt8370 support and update mt8390 and mt8395 configs

2024-03-07 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Ethan, thanks for the verification. In the future, please include the exact version of the package that you tested, and where it came from. I.e., the output of "apt-cache policy " shows all that information. There have been a few cases in the past where the verification was mistakenly done using

  1   2   3   >