Re: Review Request: Use a qml based screen locker in place of the screensaver

On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 2:37 PM, Jonathan Marten wrote: > Aleix Pol writes: >> FWIW, I'd suggest to redesign the Screen Saver KCM now, it looks terribly >> unusable... >> >> Does anybody have a plan there? > > I started looking at this (initially to address bug 57572, the ability > to select the s

Re: Review Request: Use a qml based screen locker in place of the screensaver

Aleix Pol writes: > FWIW, I'd suggest to redesign the Screen Saver KCM now, it looks terribly > unusable... > > Does anybody have a plan there? I started looking at this (initially to address bug 57572, the ability to select the savers used by "Random") recently. Since it turned out that there w

Re: Review Request: Use a qml based screen locker in place of the screensaver

On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 6:21 PM, Marco Martin wrote: >This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/106124/ > > On October 3rd, 2012, 3:42 p.m., *Martin Gräßlin* wrote: > > It's submitted, isn't it? > > yep, marked as such > > > - Marco > > On

Re: Review Request: Use a qml based screen locker in place of the screensaver

> On Oct. 3, 2012, 3:42 p.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote: > > It's submitted, isn't it? yep, marked as such - Marco --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/106124/#review19834 -

Re: Review Request: Use a qml based screen locker in place of the screensaver

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/106124/#review19834 --- It's submitted, isn't it? - Martin Gräßlin On Sept. 19, 2012

Re: Review Request: Use a qml based screen locker in place of the screensaver

> On Sept. 26, 2012, 3:43 p.m., Kai Uwe Broulik wrote: > > ksmserver/screenlocker/lockwindow.cpp, line 152 > > > > > > When the lock screen comes up I get a brief blickering. > > In LightDM and KSplashQML we use

Re: Review Request: Use a qml based screen locker in place of the screensaver

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/106124/#review19466 --- ksmserver/screenlocker/lockwindow.cpp

Re: Review Request: Use a qml based screen locker in place of the screensaver

> On Sept. 8, 2012, 12:11 p.m., Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > > ksmserver/screenlocker/DESIGN, line 13 > > > > > > "xembe[]ds" > > > > this sounds funny. the saver window is on top of the greeter? > > Marco M

Re: Review Request: Use a qml based screen locker in place of the screensaver

> On Sept. 22, 2012, 9:46 a.m., Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > > how do you plan to merge this? the history is rather messy, discarding and > > later re-introducing a lot of code, which makes tracking its origin very > > hard. therefore i'd advocate a squash merge. but then the commit should be >

Re: Review Request: Use a qml based screen locker in place of the screensaver

> On Sept. 8, 2012, 12:11 p.m., Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > > ksmserver/screenlocker/DESIGN, line 13 > > > > > > "xembe[]ds" > > > > this sounds funny. the saver window is on top of the greeter? > > Marco M

Re: Review Request: Use a qml based screen locker in place of the screensaver

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/106124/#review19290 --- how do you plan to merge this? the history is rather messy, dis

Re: Review Request: Use a qml based screen locker in place of the screensaver

> On Sept. 8, 2012, 12:11 p.m., Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > > ksmserver/screenlocker/DESIGN, line 13 > > > > > > "xembe[]ds" > > > > this sounds funny. the saver window is on top of the greeter? > > Marco M

Re: Review Request: Use a qml based screen locker in place of the screensaver

> On Sept. 16, 2012, 2 a.m., Michael Pyne wrote: > > It took me awhile to get to do it properly but I've compiled the patched > > kde-workspace and I have to say it's really impressive! No matter what I do > > I can't confuse the screen locker into showing even a flash of the desktop > > under

Re: Review Request: Use a qml based screen locker in place of the screensaver

> On Sept. 8, 2012, 12:11 p.m., Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > > ksmserver/screenlocker/DESIGN, line 13 > > > > > > "xembe[]ds" > > > > this sounds funny. the saver window is on top of the greeter? yes, they'r

Re: Review Request: Use a qml based screen locker in place of the screensaver

> On Sept. 16, 2012, 2 a.m., Michael Pyne wrote: > > It took me awhile to get to do it properly but I've compiled the patched > > kde-workspace and I have to say it's really impressive! No matter what I do > > I can't confuse the screen locker into showing even a flash of the desktop > > under

Re: Review Request: Use a qml based screen locker in place of the screensaver

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/106124/ --- (Updated Sept. 19, 2012, 4:57 p.m.) Review request for KDE Runtime and Mar

Re: Review Request: Use a qml based screen locker in place of the screensaver

> On Sept. 16, 2012, 2 a.m., Michael Pyne wrote: > > It took me awhile to get to do it properly but I've compiled the patched > > kde-workspace and I have to say it's really impressive! No matter what I do > > I can't confuse the screen locker into showing even a flash of the desktop > > under

Re: Review Request: Use a qml based screen locker in place of the screensaver

> On Sept. 16, 2012, 2 a.m., Michael Pyne wrote: > > It took me awhile to get to do it properly but I've compiled the patched > > kde-workspace and I have to say it's really impressive! No matter what I do > > I can't confuse the screen locker into showing even a flash of the desktop > > under

Re: Review Request: Use a qml based screen locker in place of the screensaver

> On Sept. 16, 2012, 2 a.m., Michael Pyne wrote: > > It took me awhile to get to do it properly but I've compiled the patched > > kde-workspace and I have to say it's really impressive! No matter what I do > > I can't confuse the screen locker into showing even a flash of the desktop > > under

Re: Review Request: Use a qml based screen locker in place of the screensaver

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/106124/#review19008 --- It took me awhile to get to do it properly but I've compiled th

Re: Review Request: Use a qml based screen locker in place of the screensaver

> On Sept. 13, 2012, 11:22 p.m., Michael Pyne wrote: > > Is there any documentation on how to port screensavers over to the > > QML-based framework? > > > > I'm also confused about something else, is there really no way to XEmbed a > > typical X screensaver into a managed viewport or something

Re: Review Request: Use a qml based screen locker in place of the screensaver

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/106124/#review18947 --- Is there any documentation on how to port screensavers over to

Re: Review Request: Use a qml based screen locker in place of the screensaver

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/106124/ --- (Updated Sept. 13, 2012, 12:17 p.m.) Review request for KDE Runtime and Ma

Re: Review Request: Use a qml based screen locker in place of the screensaver

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/106124/#review18681 --- ksmserver/main.cpp

Re: Review Request: Use a qml based screen locker in place of the screensaver

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/106124/ --- (Updated Sept. 4, 2012, 3:23 p.m.) Review request for KDE Runtime and Mart

Re: Review Request: Use a qml based screen locker in place of the screensaver

> On Aug. 25, 2012, 9:02 a.m., Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > > ksmserver/screenlocker/greeter/greeterapp.cpp, line 199 > > > > > > looks anything between pointless and harmful. care to explain? was a misunderstanding

Re: Review Request: Use a qml based screen locker in place of the screensaver

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/106124/#review17977 --- it would be good if you could present a "process model", so i c

Re: Review Request: Use a qml based screen locker in place of the screensaver

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/106124/ --- (Updated Aug. 24, 2012, 11:30 a.m.) Review request for KDE Runtime. Chan

Re: Review Request: Use a qml based screen locker in place of the screensaver

> On Aug. 22, 2012, 8:38 p.m., Ben Cooksley wrote: > > From what I recall a new screensaver framework was promised - please see > > http://forum.kde.org/viewtopic.php?f=66&t=97102 > > Where is the new Framework? The "new framework" mentions Qt Quick being used to create future screensavers eas

Re: Review Request: Use a qml based screen locker in place of the screensaver

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/106124/#review17883 --- >From what I recall a new screensaver framework was promised -

Re: Review Request: Use a qml based screen locker in place of the screensaver

> On Aug. 22, 2012, 8:27 p.m., Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > So no screensavers at all? yep, the screensavers would be completely removed for various reasons, was discussed a while ago, unfortunately work progressed quite slowly and there wasn't that much discussion http://old.nabble.com/ScreenS

Re: Review Request: Use a qml based screen locker in place of the screensaver

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/106124/#review17880 --- So no screensavers at all? - Albert Astals Cid On Aug. 22, 2

Re: Review Request: Use a qml based screen locker in place of the screensaver

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/106124/ --- (Updated Aug. 22, 2012, 6:07 p.m.) Review request for KDE Runtime. Descr

Review Request: Use a qml based screen locker in place of the screensaver

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/106124/ --- Review request for KDE Runtime. Description --- this is the finalizat