speed?
Regards
Andy
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=503683
--- Comment #5 from Andy ---
I've been correcting all the incorrect face frames since yesterday.
Unfortunately, it doesn't work via People -> Preview. Right-clicking -> "Remove
All Faces" removes the image from the preview an
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=503683
--- Comment #4 from Andy ---
Hi Maik,
Yes. I've been using MariaDB remotely on a NAS for a few months now.
Last year, I experimented a lot with SQLite and MySQL internal.
Regards
Andy
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching al
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=503683
--- Comment #2 from Andy ---
Created attachment 180900
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=180900&action=edit
Foto2
Hi Mike,
I'm sending you a JPG for your review.
Regards
Andy
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
ime ago.
My question now is whether these entire photos are also used for face
recognition. Due to the background scan, there are now fewer and fewer faces
that I have to confirm or ignore. There are now about 5,700 faces – and it will
continue for a long time.
Regards
Andy
--
You are receivi
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=428272
Andy changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kde.20.andromodon@spamgourm
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=503439
--- Comment #3 from andy ---
(In reply to John Kizer from comment #2)
> Hi - for what it's worth, I can't reproduce this on my Fedora KDE 42 device
> with Plasma 6.3.4.
>
> What page do you have System Monitor open to when it
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=502754
--- Comment #17 from Andy ---
Hi!
After 8 hours of face recognition running in the background, I closed the
program. It took about 30 seconds.
MariaDB remote
Regards
Andy
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=501251
--- Comment #20 from Andy ---
Created attachment 180714
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=180714&action=edit
20250427_221900
Hello Mike,
digiKam has been detecting new faces for about seven hours. I haven't touched
the
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=503439
--- Comment #1 from andy ---
grepping the journal for the last 5 hours I have ~500k lines with this, approx
100k per hour or ~30 per sec.
I only see these two lines referenced:
qrc:/qt/qml/org/kde/desktop/TreeViewDelegate.qml:50:5: Unable to assign
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=503439
Bug ID: 503439
Summary: plasma-systemmonitor log spam dozens per second
TreeViewDelegate.qml:139:13: Unable to assign
[undefined] to QString
Classification: Applications
Produc
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=502754
--- Comment #14 from Andy ---
Hello Gilles,
at https://files.kde.org/digikam/
some installation files are not updated and are still dated April 24, 2025
Regards
Andy
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=501251
--- Comment #19 from Andy ---
Hi Mike,
I'll run digiKam again tonight. I think it might take 6-8 hours.
Regards
Andy
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=501073
--- Comment #43 from andy ---
Anyone have a workaround? I heard comments that masking the service doesn't
work?
I'm gonna try
systemctl --user edit plasma-powerdevil.service
and add
[Service]
RuntimeMaxSec=600
Cause as much
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=502754
--- Comment #12 from Andy ---
Hello Mike,
Unfortunately, I can't really say yet whether exiting has become significantly
faster. The times always varied. Maybe longer if I was confirming or ignoring
faces for many hours.
Perhaps @rb2005 can share
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=502754
--- Comment #9 from Andy ---
Hi Mike,
I've created a new output with today's build.
This was created after closing digiKam. It took about a minute.
https://Zunar.synology.me:55241/d/s/135XA47wWnJ8amvBAiuNaDwaIi9hTDMb/JGQ1e8c07cBjrgBEScn_wb
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=502754
Andy changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zu...@gmx.de
--- Comment #6 from Andy ---
Hi Mike
I
everything is
finished in the background, the Windows window also closed. What do you think?
Regards
Andy
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=501251
--- Comment #17 from Andy ---
AMD Phenom II 1100T, ASUS M4A88T-V EVO, Windows 10 Pro
AMD Ryzen™ 7 7800X3D, Prozessor, MSI B650 Board, Windows 10 Pro
Synology NAS DS918+
1 6-Port Switch, 1GbE LAN-Ports
1 FritzBox 7490
Database: remote
MariaDB-Server
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=501251
--- Comment #15 from Andy ---
Hi,
Has the database connection completely crashed?
Because I can still switch to other albums or other people in digiKam and the
thumbnails load.
Regards, Andy
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=501251
--- Comment #13 from Andy ---
Created attachment 180269
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=180269&action=edit
20250414_222301 - Bild1
And here
Andy
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=501251
--- Comment #12 from Andy ---
Created attachment 180268
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=180268&action=edit
20250414_222301 - Ausgabe
Hello Gilles,
The PC performed automatic face detection overnight.
This morning, I confirmed a fe
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=501464
--- Comment #16 from Andy ---
Hi Gilles,
Feel free to close.
Does Maik want to add anything else to the overlay tool? #9
Regards
Andy
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=501603
--- Comment #4 from Andy ---
Hello,
I confirmed four faces of one person. They were displayed in the queue. I
force-quit digiKam in Task Manager. The changes weren't written to the files.
The changes are in the database.
When I restart digiKam
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=465575
--- Comment #7 from Andy ---
Hello Mike,
Yes, that works very well. New faces are constantly being recognized.
I might have some more ideas.
I suspect that recognition always starts with FaceID 1, then 2, 3, 4, etc.
Ignored faces are skipped.
If the
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=465575
--- Comment #5 from Andy ---
Hi Mike,
Thank you very much!
I've installed and launched the new version. Face scanning started
automatically and will take a few hours.
How exactly will the new feature work?
Regards
Andy
--
You are receiving this
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=494518
andy changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||a...@digitalsignalperson.co
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=501603
--- Comment #2 from Andy ---
Hello,
All right! Then I'm no longer allowed to use this option.
I liked working with it because it was a bit faster in my network environment.
With about 300-400 entries in the queue, I let them process and made mys
hronization" is active. There were
about 60 files in the queue. Due to the crash, the changes weren't written to
the file. After starting digiKam, the queue is empty.
Is there a way to still execute the last changes?
Regards
Andy
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=501073
--- Comment #14 from andy ---
the suggestion to restart powerdevil might be a good workaround
I noticed in System Settings if I clicked Power Management, the System Settings
app would hang.
Then I did `systemctl --user restart plasma
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=501073
--- Comment #12 from andy ---
Sounds like similar issue here
https://www.reddit.com/r/archlinux/comments/1j9o4aw/freeze_after_starting_video_on_youtube_or/
> freeze after starting video on Youtube or whenever an animated
> banner/background sta
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=501073
--- Comment #13 from andy ---
Here's another example from the last week:
https://discuss.kde.org/t/some-issues-with-screen-lock-sleep-and-freezing-desktop/31210/6
When I created this bug there were almost no google search results for
"kwin_w
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=501257
--- Comment #12 from Andy ---
OK, then it was a coincidence.
I clicked many more times. The name does disappear and reappear. Often the face
is not even recognized as a face.
I can install 8.6.0 again and test it.
Regards
Andy
--
You are receiving
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=501495
--- Comment #2 from Andy ---
Hi!
There were already confirmed faces. I deleted those too.
Andy
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=501251
--- Comment #9 from Andy ---
This reg entry is more for Windows servers so that the connection is terminated
more quickly.
https://www.consic.de/de/einstellung-der-tcp-keepalive-zeit-fuer-windows-server
Could digikam ping the database every x minutes
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=501464
--- Comment #14 from Andy ---
Hi Gilles,
I don't use social media. Sorry!
Andy
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=501251
--- Comment #10 from Andy ---
Created attachment 179417
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=179417&action=edit
Output 20250315_093800
Hello,
Face scanning has been running for all photos for 10 hours. 15% is now
complete. The connec
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=501464
--- Comment #10 from Andy ---
(In reply to Michael Miller from comment #8)
> Hi Andy,
> It looks like you used a Face Size setting of Small or Extra-Small. If you
> rescan the images with a setting of Large or Extra Large it will remove t
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=501495
--- Comment #3 from Andy ---
The information of the confirmed faces was deleted from the database, but not
in the JPG.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
e JPG.
Regards
Andy
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=501464
--- Comment #6 from Andy ---
Hi Mike,
Yes, you're right! If I rescanned, the face tags would be added again. Ignoring
them is actually better.
I was also fooled. After removing all faces from the photo and rescanning, only
7 faces were found. The
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=501464
--- Comment #4 from Andy ---
Hi!
I think all unconfirmed faces is better.
In the example photo, you can see that names were automatically suggested for
some faces. False positives. I would have to set those to unknown first.
I always confirm all known
on=edit
Picture1
Hello,
I have another suggestion for version 8.7.0.
I would like to delete all unconfirmed face markers in the preview. This is
useful for large gatherings of people, for anyone who was randomly captured and
is completely unknown.
Regards
Andy
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=501073
andy changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|6.3.3 |6.3.2
--- Comment #9 from andy ---
I can note this has
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=501073
andy changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|UPSTREAM|---
Status|RESOLVED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=501257
--- Comment #28 from Andy ---
(In reply to Michael Miller from comment #27)
> Would you agree that face engine 8.6.0 is an improvement over 6.5.0?
Absolutely! A great success!
Regards
Andy
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watch
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=501257
--- Comment #26 from Andy ---
Created attachment 179343
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=179343&action=edit
20250312_144600
Hello Mike,
Thank you for the great praise! But you all are doing an excellent job too. :-)
I've r
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=501073
--- Comment #2 from andy ---
https://discuss.kde.org/t/6-2-3-monitor-screen-freeze-when-playing-video/25796
Similar looking issue but
`kwin_wayland_drm: Pageflip timed out! This is a kernel bug`
instead of my
`kwin_wayland_drm: The main thread was
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=501275
--- Comment #3 from Andy ---
Hi!
I now have the preview database back in mySQL. It contains almost all the data
that existed before I switched to the "thumbnails-digikam.db".
The performance is not worse in my opinion. Maybe even a little
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=501275
--- Comment #2 from Andy ---
All clear!
So when assigning the faces, the preview images are marked for deletion and a
new image is saved. Probably because new information (metadata?) is stored in
it?
I'm currently asking myself whether it makes
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=501257
--- Comment #17 from Andy ---
Here:
https://Zunar.synology.me:55241/d/s/woCCEnd9K44ORfBcsVVyh9Otce6pWnX6/we6r3ACohVnbxl3P-tF6CWKMD94gHFD7-Yr8gpCo7HQw
The woman in the back row in the middle is not recognized as a face.
Regards
Andy
--
You are
reject the suggestion
Hi!
when I'm in the preview, could the selection for the face perhaps also include
"reject suggestion"?
I always have to exit the preview to reject the suggestion.
Cheers
Andy
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=501257
--- Comment #14 from Andy ---
Done. 8.6.0 is installed again.
The database has been updated.
Opened a photo and removed all faces. Searched for faces. When the search is
finished, names are suggested. There are two faces that remain unknown. Start
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=501257
--- Comment #19 from Andy ---
https://Zunar.synology.me:55241/d/s/12TzKM68zliQYnaGlfDPZNSOrQ7BHhG8/kSLYcTo6fv_6EvyQAiEs83jshyXE8XT8-jbGgaoM9HQw
Hello Mike,
here are a few more examples.
I have set "Extra Small" in the settings. I'
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=501257
--- Comment #21 from Andy ---
Hello Mike,
I'd be happy to help. :-) I'm happy to test it.
Maybe some faces aren't ready for face recognition so soon after being found.
Maybe there's a delay when writing and reading in the da
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=501257
--- Comment #15 from Andy ---
So, a face is not recognized as a face.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=501257
--- Comment #9 from Andy ---
Hi!
I removed all the faces in one of the pictures in question and added the frames
again. Then clicked "Recognize faces". Some of the faces were recognized
correctly. 2 or 3 others were unknown.
I started "
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=501257
--- Comment #8 from Andy ---
Created attachment 179259
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=179259&action=edit
Picture1
Hi!
I have a screenshot here. The size should actually be sufficient.
There are several almost identical versions
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=501257
--- Comment #6 from Andy ---
Forget it. The blue button at the top right just links to the page. Phew.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=501257
--- Comment #5 from Andy ---
Hi!
I can't download 8.5.0. Nothing happens. I've tried three browsers.
https://www.digikam.org/download/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
C:\...
When I confirm or reject a face, the database grows by about 20-30 KB each
time. The thumbnails-digikam.db is currently 3.2 GB in size.
Is it possible that the preview image is written to the database again after an
action?
Best Regards
Andy
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
t actually known faces cannot be assigned and
remain unknown? Insufficient training data? In the settings, both values are
set to 7.
I have also manually assigned the same people without names in many other group
photos.
I'm really sorry for being so annoying.
All the best
Andy
--
You are
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=501251
--- Comment #6 from Andy ---
The question is whether Synology does this too. It can be reached at any time
using Quickconnect and Active Insight.
Hmm. To find out, I could run a debug all night.
The paper is too big for me. I don't work with
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=501257
--- Comment #2 from Andy ---
MariaDB Ver 11.4 in Synology Docker.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=501251
--- Comment #2 from Andy ---
Yes, that's what I thought too. But I disabled power saving mode or sleep mode
completely. Both devices ran through the night.
Could some software disconnect the connection after x hours of inactivity?
--
Yo
d!
I had the same problem a few days ago.
Best regards
Andy
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=501225
--- Comment #1 from Andy ---
Hi!
hm. I think subgroups would also be useful for the ignored faces. I'm looking
for a person who I'd really like to give a name to.
The entries are sorted by face tag. But that one face is scattered all ove
loaded for one group and not all 155,000.
There are still a lot of faces in this list that are already known. I have
already carried out face recognition many times.
Thanks
Andy
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=501217
--- Comment #2 from Andy ---
Created attachment 179222
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=179222&action=edit
Output 20250308_121600
Hi!
OK. It says monitoring of external programs. So I thought that changes by
digikam itself were e
ead several times.
"digikam.metaengine: Loading metadata with "Exiv2" backend "
Thanks
Andy
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=501073
--- Comment #1 from andy ---
Encountered this again clicking a youtube link without thinking. I got the same
hanging, but on a second attempt afterwards it did not hang.
The pattern is:
- When rtkit-daemon gives firefox higher priority thread as
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=500570
--- Comment #92 from Andy ---
Hi Mike,
I've been testing all evening. There are no more problems. Great work!
Thank you very much!
Andy
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=501073
Bug ID: 501073
Summary: kwin gets locked up playing a youtube video in firefox
and "kwin_wayland_drm: The main thread was hanging
temporarily!"
Classification: Plasma
Product:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=500570
--- Comment #89 from Andy ---
Hi Mike,
here is the end of the run just now. The serial number 4230 is loaded twice,
processed once, and deleted once. Then processed again and deleted, but without
a file name.
I think this is the situation you mean
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=500570
--- Comment #86 from Andy ---
Hello Mike,
I have no idea at the moment which installed software could still have OpenCV.
Maybe benchmark programs like AIDA64 or PC Mark 10? I uninstalled them. The
Nvidia driver was completely reinstalled
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=500570
--- Comment #84 from Andy ---
Created attachment 179076
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=179076&action=edit
Ausgabe 20250303_194100
Hello,
here is the new output
Andy
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=500570
--- Comment #79 from Andy ---
Created attachment 179041
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=179041&action=edit
Ausgabe 20250302_154700
Hi!
Here the second output
Cheers
Andy
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=500570
--- Comment #78 from Andy ---
Created attachment 179040
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=179040&action=edit
Ausgabe 20250302_152500
Hello,
As a quality checker in the credits? So much honor? Thank you very much!
But then please use
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=500570
--- Comment #75 from Andy ---
Created attachment 179032
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=179032&action=edit
Ausgabe 20250302_091300
Good morning,
I just saw that my last message from yesterday evening isn't here.
I rebuilt t
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=500570
--- Comment #71 from Andy ---
Hi Mike,
could it be due to one of the values in my.cnf?
I have to admit that I don't know what they mean. I gathered them from the
internet, except for the last line from your documentation.
[m
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=500570
--- Comment #69 from Andy ---
Hello Mike,
20090223_120113.JPG 2 faces unknown, no others recognized or named.
20080511_110601.jpg 3 faces named, about 15 unknown.
Cheers
Andy
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=500570
--- Comment #66 from Andy ---
Created attachment 179011
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=179011&action=edit
Ausgabe 20250301_173200
Hello Mike,
yes, 3 faces were found and already named.
Each picture only appears once in the col
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=500570
--- Comment #67 from Andy ---
Created attachment 179012
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=179012&action=edit
digikam_Log
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=500570
--- Comment #62 from Andy ---
Created attachment 179005
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=179005&action=edit
Ausgabe 20250301
Hello,
Face recognition ran twice without any problems.
The third time it crashed. Here is the output.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=500570
--- Comment #59 from Andy ---
I started the face recognition with one core and with all cores. The program
was always in the foreground.
I also deactivated all cores except one with msconfig. So only 1 core instead
of 16 cores.
digikam always crashed
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=500570
--- Comment #56 from Andy ---
Hi!
Can you tell me if the problem is perhaps with the Ryzen PC? Because there are
no problems with the old Phenom.
Cheers
Andy
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=500570
--- Comment #55 from Andy ---
Created attachment 178924
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=178924&action=edit
Debug 20250226
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=500570
--- Comment #54 from Andy ---
Created attachment 178923
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=178923&action=edit
Memory Error
Hello Maik,
During the first run there was a memory error. (without debug version)
An error was recorded w
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=500570
--- Comment #49 from Andy ---
Created attachment 178882
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=178882&action=edit
Log1
I hope I'm doing everything right.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=500570
--- Comment #47 from Andy ---
Created attachment 178881
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=178881&action=edit
Screenshot1
Hey guys,
what do I have to do now? A new window...
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=500570
--- Comment #42 from Andy ---
digiKam-8.6.0-20250225T100206-Qt6-Win64-debug.exe is now installed
"C:\Program Files\digiKam\digikam.exe" -debug
does not work
Window with:"digikam: unknown options: d, e, b, u, g."
I still
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=500570
--- Comment #44 from Andy ---
OK. digikam.exe only starts without the addition of -debug. I misunderstood
that. The correct program is installed.
I'll run the face recognition this evening and send you the debug output from
Visual Studio fro
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=500570
--- Comment #41 from Andy ---
I'll try again
On February 24, 2025, I downloaded and installed
digiKam-8.6.0-20250224T060216-Qt6-Win64-debug.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=500570
--- Comment #37 from Andy ---
Created attachment 178858
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=178858&action=edit
Debug in VM with SQlite
Hi!
"C:\Program Files\digiKam\digikam.exe" -debug
does not work
"C:\Program Fil
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=500570
--- Comment #36 from Andy ---
(In reply to caulier.gilles from comment #34)
> Andy, bitte verwenden Sie das Windows-Installationsprogramm 8.6.0 vorab mit
> „-debug“ im Dateinamen. Wenn ein Absturz auftritt, können wir die genaue
> Zeile i
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=500570
--- Comment #31 from Andy ---
Created attachment 178839
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=178839&action=edit
debug
Hello Mike and Maik,
I actually just wanted to show that I seem to have got it working ;-) Tried it
out in a VM du
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=500570
--- Comment #28 from Andy ---
Created attachment 178811
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=178811&action=edit
debug1
is it OK like this?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=500570
--- Comment #25 from Andy ---
Hi!
I'm in Visual Studio 22. But I can't find it
"In Visual Studio, select Debug > Attach to Process (or press Ctrl+Alt+P) to
open the Attach to Process dialog box".
Do extensions need to be instal
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=500570
--- Comment #23 from Andy ---
Hi
I can't get any further today.
Where can I find "Debug/Attach to Process menu entry" in Visual Studio?
Can you please send me a screenshot?
Cheers
Andy
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You a
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=500570
--- Comment #21 from Andy ---
Hi!
Unfortunately, resetting the Thumbs database from AMD Ryzen to mySQL didn't
help. The first run went through without any problems. The second run stopped
again after 2% and closed the program.
I have no idea now.
1 - 100 of 657 matches
Mail list logo