https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=447767
--- Comment #44 from Michael Miller ---
(In reply to Igor Skoric from comment #43)
> @caulier Sorry for not participating in the discussion, i am currently too
> busy to test. Maik has my test sample and he has hereby my permission to
>
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=501974
Michael Miller changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||michael_mil...@msn.com
--- Comment #16 from
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=501251
Michael Miller changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||michael_mil...@msn.com
--- Comment #14 from
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=445697
--- Comment #16 from Michael Miller ---
(In reply to Jonathan Kamens from comment #15)
> Created attachment 180233 [details]
> pop-up screenshot
>
> N.B. when I killed and then restarted the digiKam appimage, it popped up
> this, whi
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=445697
--- Comment #13 from Michael Miller ---
(In reply to Jonathan Kamens from comment #12)
> > The priority for one of the face scanning threads was set incorrectly. It's
> > been fixed in my development branch which should be
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=445697
--- Comment #11 from Michael Miller ---
(In reply to caulier.gilles from comment #10)
> Thanks Jonathan for the very instructive feedback.
>
> I CC Michael Miller in this room. He works on the face workflow topic
> currently.
>
>
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=499208
--- Comment #12 from Michael Miller ---
(In reply to Orontion from comment #11)
> Okay, sounds fair. Thank you for explanation!
>
> I hope, this AI capabilities do not require internet connection and do not
> send user's da
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=499208
--- Comment #10 from Michael Miller ---
(In reply to caulier.gilles from comment #9)
> Because this is the plan : add an AI based processor to fix images, not only
> crop, but perspective, rotation (already done), etc.
>
> The original
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=502487
Michael Miller changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||michael_mil...@msn.com
--- Comment #1 from
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=502219
--- Comment #28 from Michael Miller ---
Hi Marc,
> Just one last question: can the background scan still modify faces that are
> already being suggested to someone, or does it only affect faces that
> haven’t been suggested yet? Hopefully
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=502219
--- Comment #26 from Michael Miller ---
Hi Marc,
> It actually makes a lot of sense (Picasa used to work this way, re-scanning
> your faces in the background when you confirmed a face).
Yep, that's why we added it.
>I just wish Bug
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=502219
--- Comment #24 from Michael Miller ---
(In reply to MarcP from comment #23)
> Hey,
>
> I'm not reopening the ticket because the issue is gone, but I noticed that
> Digikam scanned my whole picture collection and suggested new faces
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=465575
--- Comment #6 from Michael Miller ---
(In reply to Andy from comment #5)
> Hi Mike,
> Thank you very much!
> I've installed and launched the new version. Face scanning started
> automatically and will take a few hours.
> How
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=502455
Michael Miller changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||michael_mil...@msn.com
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=502219
--- Comment #9 from Michael Miller ---
(In reply to MarcP from comment #8)
> Hi Maik. Yes, I have set face detection for newly found items at startup. My
> library has around 200 000 pictures and I must have 1000-1500 different
> people, with
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=502200
--- Comment #10 from Michael Miller ---
(In reply to Braun.Lot from comment #9)
> Hi Mike,
> the images are about 100 MB each. so just a Link:
> https://magentacloud.de/s/ZbCLwrii5DMPjEG
> Bild025.tif is not rotated (false)
> Bild033
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=502219
--- Comment #11 from Michael Miller ---
(In reply to MarcP from comment #10)
> Sure, I'll try that later today.
Thank you. There will be a number after "FaceClassifier::loadTrainingData:
training completed in" which is th
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=465575
Michael Miller changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REPORTED|RESOLVED
Version Fixed In
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=502200
--- Comment #16 from Michael Miller ---
(In reply to Braun.Lot from comment #15)
> Hi Mike,
> just checked and it is really good! Thank you.
>
> I am not sure about it, but it seems to me, that there are a few (just two
> or three out
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=447767
--- Comment #39 from Michael Miller ---
Hi Curtis,
Have you been able to test the fix?
Cheers,
Mike
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=501763
Michael Miller changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||michael_mil...@msn.com
--- Comment #4 from
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=501684
Michael Miller changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||michael_mil...@msn.com
--- Comment #5 from
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=444394
--- Comment #17 from Michael Miller ---
Git commit 7cd0b91e4e18e7d513e941f80007bffb66bb08b8 by Michael Miller.
Committed on 02/04/2025 at 17:45.
Pushed by michmill into branch 'master'.
Work/michmill/facebackgroundprocess
- A new recognize
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=502219
Michael Miller changed:
What|Removed |Added
Latest Commit||https://invent.kde.org/grap
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=502219
--- Comment #22 from Michael Miller ---
> Hi Mike,
>
> I just tested with the new build
> (digiKam-8.7.0-20250403T061347-Qt6-Win64.exe) that was uploaded today to the
> files.kde.org/digikam site, and I can confirm that several faces
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=501627
Michael Miller changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version Fixed In||8.7.0
Resolution
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=502219
--- Comment #20 from Michael Miller ---
Hi Marc,
The fix should be in the build available Saturday. Please let me know if you
have any problems or questions.
Cheers,
Mike
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=502200
--- Comment #14 from Michael Miller ---
Hi Lothar,
The fix should be in the daily build available Saturday. Please let me know if
you have any problems or questions.
Thanks for your help!
Cheers,
Mike
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=502200
Michael Miller changed:
What|Removed |Added
Latest Commit||https://invent.kde.org/grap
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=502200
--- Comment #12 from Michael Miller ---
(In reply to Braun.Lot from comment #11)
> Hi Mike,
> converted to jpg they work much better. But to do a bulk test it would be
> nice to can at least mark 100 files in one album and not to rotate every
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=501627
Michael Miller changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||michael_mil...@msn.com
--- Comment #4 from
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=501690
--- Comment #8 from Michael Miller ---
Git commit 7cd0b91e4e18e7d513e941f80007bffb66bb08b8 by Michael Miller.
Committed on 02/04/2025 at 17:45.
Pushed by michmill into branch 'master'.
Work/michmill/facebackgroundprocess
- A new recognize
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=502219
--- Comment #18 from Michael Miller ---
(In reply to MarcP from comment #17)
> Hi,
>
> I capture the logs while I started digikam. I made sure there were no new
> pictures in the library so the logs doesn't get cluttered.
>
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=502219
--- Comment #16 from Michael Miller ---
I'm working in a new branch to add background face processing. I added missing
error logic when a second face scan was started so it now shows an error
message. There's a visual indicator now that
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=502200
--- Comment #8 from Michael Miller ---
(In reply to Braun.Lot from comment #7)
> Hi Mike,
> this would be just the feature I am looking for - if it would work somewhat
> reliable.
> Is there any chance to train it, or do you need some tes
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=502200
--- Comment #6 from Michael Miller ---
Hi Lothar,
You can try it now. It was added last week. Download the latest pre-release
version of digiKam 8.7.0
https://files.kde.org/digikam/
Here's a quick demo:
https://imgur.com/a/OXcvybd
Cheers,
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=502200
--- Comment #3 from Michael Miller ---
(In reply to Braun.Lot from comment #2)
> Hello Mike,
> to put it in other words:
> All Images are in Landscape orientation. I would like for digikam to set the
> correct orientation flag.
> (Or a
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=502219
Michael Miller changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||michael_mil...@msn.com
--- Comment #7 from
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=502200
Michael Miller changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||michael_mil...@msn.com
--- Comment #1 from
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=490022
Michael Miller changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||michael_mil...@msn.com
--- Comment #1 from
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=502052
--- Comment #4 from Michael Miller ---
> Yes. Apologies for misusing the "recognising" term. I should have used
> "detected".
Hi Craig,
Can you send me a copy of the image? My email can be found here:
https://invent.kde.o
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=495540
--- Comment #14 from Michael Miller ---
> I've tested the 8.6.0 release for Windows and the progress with both
> auto-tag and face detection is remarkable! Even though auto-tag is not 100%
> reliable in terms of finding their subjects
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=502052
Michael Miller changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||michael_mil...@msn.com
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=447767
--- Comment #38 from Michael Miller ---
(In reply to Curtis Barnard from comment #37)
> I'm happy to email one of my photos to someone, but would prefer not to
> attached it here. I checked and I'm in 3:2 shooting mode, not 16:9. Than
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=447767
--- Comment #36 from Michael Miller ---
Git commit 15ad7b947d73f13c1422a1843b9a67179ef72765 by Michael Miller.
Committed on 26/03/2025 at 00:35.
Pushed by michmill into branch 'master'.
Use Raw or HalfRaw for Sony Raw Images.
M +14
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=447767
--- Comment #35 from Michael Miller ---
(In reply to Maik Qualmann from comment #34)
> Hi Michael, I can send you the sample image this evening in my time zone. Or
> set the camera to 16:9. You'll then have a 16:9 preview image, but the
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=447767
Michael Miller changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||michael_mil...@msn.com
--- Comment #33 from
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=224612
--- Comment #16 from Michael Miller ---
(In reply to caulier.gilles from comment #15)
> Hi Michael,
>
> This entry will be fixed when autorotate tool will be available in Image
> Editor. Right ?
>
> Gilles
Hi Gilles,
Yes, I'm
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=501925
Michael Miller changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||michael_mil...@msn.com
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=497938
--- Comment #12 from Michael Miller ---
(In reply to Srisharan V S from comment #11)
> Hi everyone,
>
> I am Srisharan, and I have been contributing to KDE since last December,
> primarily in KDE Games. I recently went through KDE'
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=444394
--- Comment #15 from Michael Miller ---
Hi Marc,
If the faces you are rejecting are faces that will never have tags, then the
correct action is to Ignore the face instead of rejecting the face. If the
suggested face match is incorrect and should be
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=432207
--- Comment #5 from Michael Miller ---
(In reply to caulier.gilles from comment #4)
> I'm not sure to understand. It's a bug or a wish ?
>
> Gilles
Hi Gilles,
I think this is a wish.
Cheers,
Mike
--
You are receiving this ma
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=501684
--- Comment #7 from Michael Miller ---
> Im using default settings, have never changed them, so
> Face Detection Settings:
> Accuracy 7
> Face Size Large
>
> Face Recognition Settings:
> Accuracy 7
Thank you.
> I don'
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=501464
--- Comment #11 from Michael Miller ---
(In reply to Andy from comment #10)
> Hi Mike,
> the setting is always on Extra-Small
>
> Regards
> Andy
Hi Andy,
I usually keep my Face Size setting at Large. Small and Extra Small should be
u
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=501464
--- Comment #8 from Michael Miller ---
(In reply to Andy from comment #6)
> Hi Mike,
> Yes, you're right! If I rescanned, the face tags would be added again.
> Ignoring them is actually better.
> I was also fooled. After removing a
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=501257
--- Comment #20 from Michael Miller ---
(In reply to Andy from comment #19)
> https://Zunar.synology.me:55241/d/s/12TzKM68zliQYnaGlfDPZNSOrQ7BHhG8/
> kSLYcTo6fv_6EvyQAiEs83jshyXE8XT8-jbGgaoM9HQw
>
> Hello Mike,
> here are a few more e
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=501257
--- Comment #7 from Michael Miller ---
Hi Andy,
Maik and Gilles are correct. I introduced a Face Image Quality Assessment
(FIQA) in 8.6.0. FIQA filters out small, blurry, and noisy faces from being
used for face recognition because the quality of the
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=501495
Michael Miller changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||michael_mil...@msn.com
--- Comment #5 from
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=501464
Michael Miller changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||michael_mil...@msn.com
--- Comment #5 from
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=495540
--- Comment #10 from Michael Miller ---
(In reply to cvinhaes from comment #9)
> (In reply to Michael Miller from comment #8)
> > >Thank you for the updates, mate.
> >
> > The latest autotags code is in the nightly build
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=501257
--- Comment #25 from Michael Miller ---
Hi Andy,
I'm pretty sure I fixed the issues. The new build of digiKam should have the
changes. Please download and test the latest build.
One important note: After you install the latest build, you
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=501257
--- Comment #27 from Michael Miller ---
(In reply to Andy from comment #26)
> Created attachment 179343 [details]
> 20250312_144600
>
> Hello Mike,
>
> Thank you for the great praise! But you all are doing an excellent job to
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=501257
Michael Miller changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Version Fixed In
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=501257
--- Comment #24 from Michael Miller ---
Git commit 61f0fd3a45fd3fb132adf036db12253601079eca by Michael Miller.
Committed on 12/03/2025 at 02:54.
Pushed by michmill into branch 'master'.
fix 501270
M +1-1NEWS
M +57 -11
core
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=501257
--- Comment #22 from Michael Miller ---
Hi Andy,
Can you explain something please? How did you get the superpower to find bugs
in code that has been working well for months. :)
You found another well-hidden bug in digiKam.
Maik/Gilles,
The issue is
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=501257
--- Comment #16 from Michael Miller ---
Hi Andy,
Can you please attach the original image so I can run it through FIQA to see if
this is what's causing the faces to not be recognized?
Cheers,
Mike
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Yo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=501257
--- Comment #18 from Michael Miller ---
(In reply to Andy from comment #17)
> Here:
> https://Zunar.synology.me:55241/d/s/woCCEnd9K44ORfBcsVVyh9Otce6pWnX6/
> we6r3ACohVnbxl3P-tF6CWKMD94gHFD7-Yr8gpCo7HQw
>
> The woman in the back row i
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=501257
--- Comment #13 from Michael Miller ---
(In reply to Andy from comment #12)
> OK, then it was a coincidence.
> I clicked many more times. The name does disappear and reappear. Often the
> face is not even recognized as a face.
> I can i
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=501257
--- Comment #11 from Michael Miller ---
(In reply to Andy from comment #9)
> Hi!
> I removed all the faces in one of the pictures in question and added the
> frames again. Then clicked "Recognize faces". Some of the faces were
> r
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=501257
--- Comment #10 from Michael Miller ---
Hi Andy,
Can you upload the original image? I need the original, and without the face
rects detected by digiKam. The sample image faces are definitely being
rejected by FIQA because the face thumbnails are too
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=500570
Michael Miller changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REPORTED|RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=500570
--- Comment #93 from Michael Miller ---
(In reply to Andy from comment #92)
> Hi Mike,
>
> I've been testing all evening. There are no more problems. Great work!
>
> Thank you very much!
> Andy
YES! Thank you so much f
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=473576
Michael Miller changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||michael_mil...@msn.com
--- Comment #5 from
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=500570
--- Comment #91 from Michael Miller ---
Hi Andy,
There is a new Windows build on the download site. Can you please download and
test the -debug build. Same process as before. I think this might fix it.
Cheers,
Mike
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=500570
--- Comment #90 from Michael Miller ---
(In reply to Andy from comment #89)
> Hi Mike,
>
> here is the end of the run just now. The serial number 4230 is loaded twice,
> processed once, and deleted once. Then processed again and deleted, b
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=500570
--- Comment #88 from Michael Miller ---
(In reply to Andy from comment #84)
> Created attachment 179076 [details]
> Ausgabe 20250303_194100
>
> Hello,
>
> here is the new output
>
> Andy
Hi Andy,
I looked at the log agai
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=500470
--- Comment #4 from Michael Miller ---
Git commit 5305d0655c4bab772da27ea18c50f8dd637426f1 by Michael Miller.
Committed on 04/03/2025 at 19:12.
Pushed by michmill into branch 'master'.
Work/michmill/sharedqueue refactor
SharedQueue refacto
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=500570
--- Comment #85 from Michael Miller ---
(In reply to Andy from comment #84)
> Created attachment 179076 [details]
> Ausgabe 20250303_194100
>
> Hello,
>
> here is the new output
>
> Andy
Hi Andy,
Thank you again!
On your Ry
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=500570
--- Comment #83 from Michael Miller ---
Hi Andy,
There is a new build of digiKam. Can you please download the debug version and
run the same tests?
Cheers,
Mike
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=500961
Michael Miller changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REPORTED|RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=500961
--- Comment #4 from Michael Miller ---
(In reply to Petr Schonmann from comment #3)
> It was something opencl related
> ive installed
> sudo amdgpu-install --usecase=opencl,graphics,multimedia --no-dkms
> sudo apt remove --purge mesa-open
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=500961
--- Comment #2 from Michael Miller ---
Hi Petr,
Can you please create a debug log and attach it here?
Open a terminal and set the QT_LOGGING_RULES environment variable to enable
debug traces for digiKam:
export QT_LOGGING_RULES="digikam*=true
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=500570
--- Comment #82 from Michael Miller ---
Git commit c0ebbd7d142370d81d10fbc3b9a46e94c92b9468 by Michael Miller.
Committed on 02/03/2025 at 19:09.
Pushed by michmill into branch 'master'.
additional logging info for 500570
M +5-5
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=500961
--- Comment #1 from Michael Miller ---
Hi Petr,
I'm working on the problem now. I'll let you know when there is a new build of
digiKam for you to test.
Cheers,
Mike
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=500570
--- Comment #81 from Michael Miller ---
(In reply to Andy from comment #79)
> Created attachment 179041 [details]
> Ausgabe 20250302_154700
>
> Hi!
>
> Here the second output
>
> Cheers
> Andy
Hi Andy,
I think we'r
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=500570
--- Comment #76 from Michael Miller ---
(In reply to Andy from comment #75)
> Created attachment 179032 [details]
> Ausgabe 20250302_091300
>
> Good morning,
>
> I just saw that my last message from yesterday evening isn't h
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=500570
--- Comment #74 from Michael Miller ---
Hi Andy,
There is a new Windows build with some additional debug information and a few
changes. Can you please download and install the Windows-debug build from
here?
https://files.kde.org/digikam/
After you
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=500570
--- Comment #73 from Michael Miller ---
Hi Andy,
I don't think your MySql configuration is causing the issue. I don't know what
is, but I'm pretty sure that's not it.
Can you try rebuilding your face database? Go to Tools->
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=500570
--- Comment #72 from Michael Miller ---
Git commit a2022dc3254597152c7618d86947d162ff4f7f9b by Michael Miller.
Committed on 01/03/2025 at 20:14.
Pushed by michmill into branch 'master'.
clear the pipleline package before deleting
M +3
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=500570
--- Comment #70 from Michael Miller ---
(In reply to Andy from comment #69)
> Hello Mike,
>
> 20090223_120113.JPG 2 faces unknown, no others recognized or named.
>
> 20080511_110601.jpg 3 faces named, about 15 unknown.
>
> Chee
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=500570
--- Comment #68 from Michael Miller ---
(In reply to Andy from comment #66)
> Created attachment 179011 [details]
> Ausgabe 20250301_173200
>
> Hello Mike,
>
> yes, 3 faces were found and already named.
> Each picture onl
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=500570
--- Comment #65 from Michael Miller ---
Maik,
Ugh! The duplicate image names is a false-positive. Andy is doing a
recorgnize-only scan, so this is expected if the image has more than one face.
What's important to see is the face ID, and no
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=500570
--- Comment #64 from Michael Miller ---
Hi Andy,
Thank you! This is very helpful.
A few more questions for you.
Do you have multiple copies of a file called 20080511_110601.jpg in your
library? Maybe they are in different folders?
Can you please
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=500570
--- Comment #61 from Michael Miller ---
Hi Andy,
There is a new build of digiKam available that has additional logging
information. Can you please download this file?
https://files.kde.org/digikam/digiKam-8.6.0-20250301T100224-Qt6-Win64-debug.exe
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=500570
--- Comment #60 from Michael Miller ---
Git commit 6c411d939ffbc7323f426a08a82547da21cb7d6b by Michael Miller.
Committed on 27/02/2025 at 20:50.
Pushed by michmill into branch 'master'.
Additional debugging info for Andy
M +11 -3
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=500570
--- Comment #58 from Michael Miller ---
Hi Andy,
I want to confirm the error happens when "Work on processor cores" is checked,
and when it is unchecked. is that correct?
Cheers,
Mike
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are wa
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=500570
--- Comment #57 from Michael Miller ---
(In reply to Andy from comment #56)
> Hi!
> Can you tell me if the problem is perhaps with the Ryzen PC? Because there
> are no problems with the old Phenom.
>
> Cheers
> Andy
Hi Andy,
It real
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=500570
--- Comment #51 from Michael Miller ---
(In reply to Maik Qualmann from comment #50)
> @Andy, thanks that helps.
>
> @Michael, it crashes on "delete package;". Before that we have a signal/slot
> connection without specifyin
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=500570
--- Comment #39 from Michael Miller ---
(In reply to Andy from comment #37)
> Created attachment 178858 [details]
> Debug in VM with SQlite
>
> Hi!
>
> "C:\Program Files\digiKam\digikam.exe" -debug
> does not work
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=500570
--- Comment #32 from Michael Miller ---
(In reply to Andy from comment #31)
> Created attachment 178839 [details]
> debug
>
> Hello Mike and Maik,
>
> I actually just wanted to show that I seem to have got it working ;-) Tried
>
1 - 100 of 333 matches
Mail list logo
