dweiss commented on PR #14781:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14781#issuecomment-2975245870
> One problem that gradle is suffering from is, all the freedom it had given
in the (groovy) DSL implementation in its early days.
Thanks. It's subjective, I know, but I have been a
dweiss opened a new issue, #14786:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/14786
### Description
Something stopped working here -
https://github.com/apache/lucene/actions/runs/15670563859
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message,
dweiss commented on issue #14782:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/14782#issuecomment-2975278118
I've applied your patch, looks better indeed, thank you.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
dweiss opened a new pull request, #14788:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14788
Fixes #14782 by not emitting duplicate lint flags to javac.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go
dweiss opened a new issue, #14787:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/14787
### Description
As reported by Uwe -
```
> Task :spotlessGradleScripts
Missing required bundle org.eclipse.jdt.debug needed by
[org.eclipse.jdt.launching, org.eclipse.jdt.launching.macos
dweiss opened a new issue, #14785:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/14785
### Description
Revert native git to jgit for collecting git status.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL
dweiss commented on code in PR #14788:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14788#discussion_r2149179129
##
build-tools/build-infra/src/main/groovy/lucene.java.core.mrjar.gradle:
##
@@ -32,9 +32,14 @@ configure(project(":lucene:core")) {
tasks.named("compileMain${jd
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #14788:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14788#issuecomment-2975317328
This PR does not have an entry in lucene/CHANGES.txt. Consider adding one.
If the PR doesn't need a changelog entry, then add the skip-changelog label to
it and you will stop
dweiss commented on issue #14782:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/14782#issuecomment-2975300641
I looked at the JDK issue and Archie couldn't reproduce the issue. Here's a
repro -
```
.../jdk-25+27/bin/javac -source 24 -target 24 -Xlint:options -Xlint:-options
-Werror Fo
prudhvigodithi commented on PR #14784:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14784#issuecomment-2974928884
I have just updated the CHANGES.txt adding to 10.2.2, please let me know if
this is ok else I can change back to 10.3.0.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Serv
prudhvigodithi opened a new pull request, #14784:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14784
### Description
Following this commit
https://github.com/apache/lucene/commit/94c76c790cd0b8b1bca384c5de18ec5c7957d5d9
make `pack` methods public for `BigIntegerPoint` and `HalfFloatPoi
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #14784:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14784#issuecomment-2974683710
This PR does not have an entry in lucene/CHANGES.txt. Consider adding one.
If the PR doesn't need a changelog entry, then add the skip-changelog label to
it and you will stop
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #14783:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14783#issuecomment-2973667019
This PR does not have an entry in lucene/CHANGES.txt. Consider adding one.
If the PR doesn't need a changelog entry, then add the skip-changelog label to
it and you will stop
breskeby opened a new pull request, #14783:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14783
### Description
This fixes two more types of deprecations seen in the build:
1. Fix file permission setup using non deprecated Gradle API
2. Fix deprecated usage of other projects
breskeby commented on code in PR #14783:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14783#discussion_r2147569228
##
build-tools/build-infra/src/main/groovy/lucene.regenerate.icu.gradle:
##
@@ -30,14 +30,15 @@ def resources = rootProject.file("gradle/regenerate/icu")
* download
breskeby commented on code in PR #14783:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14783#discussion_r2147573314
##
build-tools/build-infra/src/main/groovy/lucene.regenerate.icu.gradle:
##
@@ -30,14 +30,15 @@ def resources = rootProject.file("gradle/regenerate/icu")
* download
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #14783:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14783#issuecomment-2973676150
This PR does not have an entry in lucene/CHANGES.txt. Consider adding one.
If the PR doesn't need a changelog entry, then add the skip-changelog label to
it and you will stop
uschindler commented on issue #14782:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/14782#issuecomment-2973765065
I added a similar hack to 10.x branch:
2503e832c17f6744dc33fd837f7e9f0e07d4
I'd prefer to only apply this to the MR-JAR part of compilation:
```patch
build-t
uschindler commented on issue #14782:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/14782#issuecomment-2973767174
Of course you could add the version check, too, but disabling -Werror for
the MR-JAR part is fine IMHO, because it is a hack anyways and further warnings
may appear any time soon
uschindler commented on issue #14782:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/14782#issuecomment-2973762322
I opened an issue @ JDK: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8359596
> This used to work with JDK 25-beta+11-ea.
It also worked afterwards (25 ea+15). It is a rather
uschindler commented on PR #14764:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14764#issuecomment-2973786942
> * `:spotlessGradleScripts` seems incredibly slow, but it is just a
one-time pain, the very first time you run it. I think it downloads.
It is also slow when you run it later.
HUSTERGS commented on PR #14772:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14772#issuecomment-2973806605
> Interesting. I don't believe that being able to use `Arrays#fill` helps
much, but maybe the fact that this change helps reduce polymorphism does?
@jpountz Thanks for your reply!
uschindler commented on PR #14764:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14764#issuecomment-2973613662
> * `runtime.java.home` is a build option now but the support for
> `RUNTIME_JAVA_HOME` env. variable has been implemented for backward
> compatibility.
Please keep thi
breskeby commented on PR #14781:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14781#issuecomment-2973619493
> Right... This is among those things I mentioned that I don't understand -
perhaps there are benefits to configuration caching or other advanced
features... but overall it's a lot more
24 matches
Mail list logo
