iverase merged PR #13449:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13449
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apa
vsop-479 closed pull request #13481: Update document by docID
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13481
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e
vsop-479 commented on PR #13481:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13481#issuecomment-2165361148
Close since segment merge.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific c
kkrik-es commented on PR #13341:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13341#issuecomment-2165713033
Would it be possible to back-port this fix to v.9.11? I did hit this issue
as well while trying to make use of #12829.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To
kkrik-es commented on PR #13341:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13341#issuecomment-2165959754
That would be nice, thanks. @jpountz @benwtrent fyi.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL abo
msokolov opened a new pull request, #13483:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13483
created a PR so github can run tests
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comm
msokolov commented on PR #13469:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13469#issuecomment-2166045890
I changed this to return zero results from search() rather than throwing
`UnsupportedOperationException` to be more in line with how we treat searches
over other kinds of fields that on
dweiss opened a new pull request, #13484:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13484
This patch attempts to clean up and consolidate all kinds of aspects related
to dependencies used throughout the build and "versions", understood not only
as dependency versions but also minimum java
msokolov merged PR #13483:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13483
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.ap
msokolov commented on PR #13341:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13341#issuecomment-2165955635
I don't think we can backport to 9.11 since it has already been released,
but I will backport to 9.x and then it should get released with the next. There
was some talk about a 9.11.1, s
benwtrent commented on PR #13341:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13341#issuecomment-2166407167
@msokolov it might be worth doing a 9.11.1 release to fix this particular
bug and maybe another other one: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13475
I didn't know about this ou
msokolov commented on PR #13341:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13341#issuecomment-2166553436
sigh, I would have backported right away except for some reason I thought
the parent-field enforcement was only on 10.x not 9.x
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Ser
msokolov commented on code in PR #13469:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13469#discussion_r1638780434
##
lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/codecs/lucene99/Lucene99FlatVectorsFormat.java:
##
@@ -79,7 +79,8 @@ public final class Lucene99FlatVectorsFormat extends
F
msokolov commented on code in PR #13469:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13469#discussion_r1638786155
##
lucene/codecs/src/java/org/apache/lucene/codecs/bitvectors/HnswBitVectorsFormat.java:
##
@@ -128,7 +129,7 @@ public HnswBitVectorsFormat(
} else {
this
msokolov commented on PR #13469:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13469#issuecomment-2166643207
for the failed test here I'll add a test assumption that the
randomly-selected vector format be one that supports search (ie not a
FlatVectorsFormat) since the test requires that.
--
benwtrent commented on PR #13463:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13463#issuecomment-212079
@gsmiller @mayya-sharipova
OK, I did some more testing. My initial testing didn't fully exercise these
paths as the segments were still very large. So, I switched to flushing at
benwtrent commented on code in PR #13469:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13469#discussion_r1638749258
##
lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/codecs/lucene99/Lucene99FlatVectorsReader.java:
##
@@ -217,6 +219,18 @@ public ByteVectorValues getByteVectorValues(String
msokolov merged PR #13469:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13469
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.ap
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #13390:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13390#issuecomment-2166992316
This PR has not had activity in the past 2 weeks, labeling it as stale. If
the PR is waiting for review, notify the d...@lucene.apache.org list. Thank you
for your contributi
benwtrent commented on PR #13463:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13463#issuecomment-2167001969
OK, I used the same methodology, but with CohereV3, 5M vectors.
| fanout ->| 0 | 10| 50| 100 | 200 |
|--|---|---|---|---|--
atsushi-matsui opened a new pull request, #13485:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13485
### Description
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment
21 matches
Mail list logo
