gf2121 commented on PR #12465:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12465#issuecomment-1655202239
> For example, what if we assigned disi.exists to false here?
Sorry but I do not think we should do this change indeed :
1. If a field exists in doc 1, 3. Calling `advanceExac
dweiss commented on code in PR #12464:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12464#discussion_r1277381583
##
lucene/analysis/common/src/java/org/apache/lucene/analysis/hunspell/WordStorage.java:
##
@@ -390,7 +391,7 @@ private int flushGroup() throws IOException {
i
mayya-sharipova merged PR #12466:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12466
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lu
mayya-sharipova opened a new pull request, #12467:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12467
Depending whether a document with dimensions > maxDims created on a new
segment or already existing segment, we may get different error messages. This
fix adds another possible error message
mayya-sharipova merged PR #12467:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12467
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lu
jpountz commented on PR #12436:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12436#issuecomment-1655817219
> One question I have: What happens if you open an index with a higher limit
in field infos and you use default codec? I think this is unsupported, but in
that case the implementor of th
uschindler commented on PR #12436:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12436#issuecomment-1655944398
> > One question I have: What happens if you open an index with a higher
limit in field infos and you use default codec? I think this is unsupported,
but in that case the implementor
donnerpeter merged PR #12464:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12464
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene
donnerpeter opened a new pull request, #12468:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12468
### Description
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
donnerpeter commented on code in PR #12468:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12468#discussion_r128738
##
lucene/analysis/common/src/test/org/apache/lucene/analysis/hunspell/TestAllDictionaries.java:
##
@@ -74,7 +74,12 @@ static Dictionary loadDictionary(Path aff) t
benwtrent commented on issue #12342:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/12342#issuecomment-1656112434
OK ran on two more datasets, I only ran over the first 100k documents in my
data sets.
I think this exhausts our testing for Cohere, we need to find additional
data if this
original-brownbear opened a new pull request, #12469:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12469
The logic for creating the writer runnable could be deduplicated. Also, a
couple of annonymous classes could be turned into lambdas (avoiding a redundant
`ByteBuf` instantiation in the pro
gsmiller commented on PR #12454:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12454#issuecomment-1656481929
> Overall, I like the previous code a bit better, it's cleaner and more
concise, although cachedOrdMaps looks confusing at first. Maybe it just needs a
comment explaining why using a ma
gsmiller commented on PR #12428:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12428#issuecomment-1656506806
LGTM as well. Thanks @shubhamvishu!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the s
14 matches
Mail list logo