jpountz commented on code in PR #11860:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/11860#discussion_r1025393090
##
lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/codecs/lucene95/Lucene95HnswVectorsFormat.java:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,168 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF)
jpountz commented on code in PR #11860:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/11860#discussion_r1026184428
##
lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/codecs/lucene95/Lucene95HnswVectorsReader.java:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,497 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF)
rmuir commented on code in PR #11860:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/11860#discussion_r1026351356
##
lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/codecs/lucene95/Lucene95HnswVectorsReader.java:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,497 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) u
jpountz commented on code in PR #11860:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/11860#discussion_r1026383814
##
lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/codecs/lucene95/Lucene95HnswVectorsReader.java:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,497 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF)
rmuir commented on code in PR #11860:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/11860#discussion_r1026406375
##
lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/codecs/lucene95/Lucene95HnswVectorsReader.java:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,497 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) u
dweiss commented on PR #11947:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/11947#issuecomment-1320064830
I initially wanted to use Python but without additional libraries it
overwhelmed me and I wanted to keep it simple and self-contained. There is some
extra verbosity (XML processing in Jav
dweiss commented on issue #11329:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/11329#issuecomment-1320066031
Patch implemented in #11947
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the speci
dweiss commented on PR #11947:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/11947#issuecomment-1320072940
For stand-alone use, it's simple enough too:
```
java dev-tools\scripts\StageArtifacts.java -u dweiss
/release/candidate/maven-artifacts
```
will prompt for password for nexus
jpountz commented on PR #11947:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/11947#issuecomment-1320074546
Thanks @dweiss I'll give it a try!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the spe
madrob commented on code in PR #11947:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/11947#discussion_r1026512732
##
dev-tools/scripts/StageArtifacts.java:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,395 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
+ * contributor license agreem
gsmiller commented on PR #11901:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/11901#issuecomment-1320139204
@mdmarshmallow it's similar to FacetSets but a bit different since FacetSets
work over stored points, while this would work over stored ranges. I think it
would make sense to eventually
benwtrent commented on code in PR #11860:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/11860#discussion_r1026551961
##
lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/codecs/lucene95/Lucene95HnswVectorsFormat.java:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,168 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (AS
msokolov commented on PR #11860:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/11860#issuecomment-1320161291
+1 to the awesomeness - thanks for iterating on this fruit! - how
high-hanging it is depends on one's perspective I guess.
I have to say I am mildly amused that we are now using I
rmuir opened a new issue, #11948:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/11948
### Description
smoketester leaks a GPG agent on my computer everytime it runs. @risdenk
pointed out this fix from solr:
https://github.com/apache/solr/commit/0cfef740617cc40585e3121e0b41e5cc8002471f
dweiss commented on code in PR #11947:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/11947#discussion_r1026571426
##
dev-tools/scripts/StageArtifacts.java:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,395 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
+ * contributor license agreem
dweiss commented on code in PR #11947:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/11947#discussion_r1026572395
##
dev-tools/scripts/StageArtifacts.java:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,395 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
+ * contributor license agreem
dweiss commented on code in PR #11947:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/11947#discussion_r1026573130
##
dev-tools/scripts/StageArtifacts.java:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,395 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
+ * contributor license agreem
dweiss opened a new pull request, #11949:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/11949
It's been a few times that I saw a comment on misc. PRs mentioning we want
to avoid star imports. Let's just automate it? Seems like we already have tools
to help out here.
--
This is an automated
msokolov commented on issue #11830:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/11830#issuecomment-1320183235
Hey this looks great! Awesome to see the storage gains with no loss in
query time
On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 2:25 PM Benjamin Trent ***@***.***>
wrote:
> I changed t
gsmiller opened a new pull request, #11950:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/11950
### Description
This fixes a bug where variants of `BinaryRangeFieldRangeQuery` will result
in an NPE if the field doesn't exist in a segment.
--
This is an automated message from the Apach
dweiss commented on code in PR #11947:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/11947#discussion_r1026588147
##
dev-tools/scripts/StageArtifacts.java:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,395 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
+ * contributor license agreem
dweiss merged PR #11949:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/11949
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apac
dweiss commented on PR #11949:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/11949#issuecomment-1320195854
I'll backport to 9x manually.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific
rmuir merged PR #11936:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/11936
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apach
agorlenko commented on PR #11946:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/11946#issuecomment-1320221923
If we use only post-filter in KnnVectorQuery, then we have to set k =
Integer.MAX_VALUE (or another very big value) and calculate similarity with all
vectors. So the complexity would b
rmuir opened a new issue, #11951:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/11951
### Description
I've seen this happen several times, so i think it may not be hard to
reproduce, have not tried to use the seed yet:
```
> Task :randomizationInfo
Running tests with rando
gsmiller commented on code in PR #11928:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/11928#discussion_r1026694386
##
lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/search/DisjunctionDISIApproximation.java:
##
@@ -45,29 +51,54 @@ public long cost() {
@Override
public int docID() {
gsmiller commented on code in PR #11928:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/11928#discussion_r1026697770
##
lucene/MIGRATE.md:
##
@@ -102,6 +102,12 @@ Lucene 9.2 or stay with 9.0.
See LUCENE-10558 for more details and workarounds.
+### DisjunctionDISIApproximation b
dweiss merged PR #11947:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/11947
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apac
dweiss closed issue #11329: Add an equivalent of ant's stage-maven-artifacts
for the release wizard [LUCENE-10293]
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/11329
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL
gsmiller commented on code in PR #11928:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/11928#discussion_r1026737221
##
lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/search/DisjunctionDISIApproximation.java:
##
@@ -45,29 +51,54 @@ public long cost() {
@Override
public int docID() {
gsmiller commented on PR #11928:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/11928#issuecomment-1320356774
@jpountz thanks for the implementation feedback! I've updated the PR, but
still plan to do more benchmarking to really understand the benefit, etc.
before looking to actually merge this
msokolov commented on PR #11946:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/11946#issuecomment-1320401647
> If we use only post-filter in KnnVectorQuery, then we have to set k =
Integer.MAX_VALUE (or another very big value) and calculate similarity with all
vectors. So the complexity would
msokolov commented on PR #11945:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/11945#issuecomment-1320406270
oh nice plan, thanks everyone
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specifi
agorlenko commented on PR #11946:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/11946#issuecomment-1320416549
But we don't know K - that's the problem. The task which I want to solve
sounds like this: find documents with similarity >= 0.76 (for example). We
don't have the number of such docume
msokolov commented on PR #11946:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/11946#issuecomment-1320438152
OK, can we start by providing post-filter? I think this will be a more
common use case. I want to find the best docs, and ensure that none of them
are terrible. It is less disruptiv
agorlenko commented on PR #11946:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/11946#issuecomment-1320508166
> Can you explain why you want the "find all docs with score > T"?
For example, we want to give user only suitable for him/her documents. We
have a custom scorer (based on ml-mod
benwtrent commented on PR #11860:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/11860#issuecomment-1320660919
OK, I did some more performance testing @jpountz @rmuir
Every once in a while, I see some extreme 100%/99.9% latency spikes in KNN
search times. This happened on about half of t
mdmarshmallow commented on PR #11901:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/11901#issuecomment-1320700985
Ah yeah good point on the FacetSets... so I actually already use
`LongRangeDocValueFields` here: public class `LongRangeDocValuesFacetField
extends LongRangeDocValuesField`. The di
39 matches
Mail list logo
