janhoy opened a new pull request #2630:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/2630
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15324
Upgraded jaeger and libthrift to same versions as in main
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the mes
janhoy merged pull request #2630:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/2630
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsu
Ignacio Vera created LUCENE-10310:
-
Summary: CI error in TestXYDocValuesQueries#testRandomDistanceHuge
Key: LUCENE-10310
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10310
Project: Lucene - Core
iverase opened a new pull request #537:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/537
TestXYDocValuesQueries#doRandomDistanceTest does not produce random circles
with radius with '0' value any longer. We create random circles using
ShapeTestUtils which is safe.
--
This is an automated
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10297?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17456577#comment-17456577
]
Feng Guo edited comment on LUCENE-10297 at 12/13/21, 10:08 AM:
--
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9648?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Feng Guo resolved LUCENE-9648.
--
Resolution: Won't Do
> Add a numbers query in sandbox that takes advantage of index sorting.
> ---
iverase merged pull request #537:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/537
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr..
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10310?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17458309#comment-17458309
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-10310:
--
Co
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10310?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17458308#comment-17458308
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-10310:
--
Co
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10310?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ignacio Vera resolved LUCENE-10310.
---
Fix Version/s: 9.1
Assignee: Ignacio Vera
Resolution: Fixed
> CI error in T
pquentin opened a new pull request #538:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/538
Five times every 10 000 tests, we did not index any documents with i
between 0 and 10 (inclusive), which caused the deleted tests to fail.
With this commit, we make sure that we always index at
Ignacio Vera created LUCENE-10311:
-
Summary: Should DocIdSetBuilder have different implementations for
point and terms?
Key: LUCENE-10311
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10311
Projec
msokolov commented on pull request #536:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/536#issuecomment-992654351
I seem to remember that when I checked (you can use `-fanout` parameter to
`KnnGraphTester` IIRC) most nodes were *not* fully populated; ie they had fewer
than `maxConn` connectio
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10297?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Feng Guo updated LUCENE-10297:
--
Description:
We introduced a bitset optimization for extremly low cardinality fields in
[LUCENE-1023
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10297?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17456577#comment-17456577
]
Feng Guo edited comment on LUCENE-10297 at 12/13/21, 4:56 PM:
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10297?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17456577#comment-17456577
]
Feng Guo edited comment on LUCENE-10297 at 12/13/21, 5:08 PM:
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10297?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17456577#comment-17456577
]
Feng Guo edited comment on LUCENE-10297 at 12/13/21, 5:10 PM:
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10297?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17456577#comment-17456577
]
Feng Guo edited comment on LUCENE-10297 at 12/13/21, 5:10 PM:
---
gsmiller commented on pull request #509:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/509#issuecomment-992752034
Ah I think I understand the need for retaining the tree structure now. With
taxonomy faceting, we generally "roll up" ancestry counts at construction-time
but with this approach w
mdmarshmallow commented on pull request #509:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/509#issuecomment-992806271
Yeah we would double count ancestors if they are in the same document. I'll
need to look more into what exactly "rolling up" is and more on how
taxonomy-based faceting works.
jtibshirani commented on a change in pull request #534:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/534#discussion_r768100327
##
File path: lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/codecs/KnnVectorsWriter.java
##
@@ -40,7 +41,8 @@
protected KnnVectorsWriter() {}
/** Write
sonatype-lift[bot] commented on a change in pull request #463:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/463#discussion_r768196992
##
File path:
lucene/queryparser/src/java/org/apache/lucene/queryparser/indri/IndriQueryParser.java
##
@@ -0,0 +1,357 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
janhoy opened a new pull request #2631:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/2631
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15843
https://logging.apache.org/log4j/2.x/changes-report.html#a2.16.0
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to
janhoy merged pull request #2631:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/2631
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsu
mayya-sharipova commented on pull request #536:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/536#issuecomment-993080804
@msokolov Thanks for the initial review, it is good to know that we are ok
with this idea. I will do the comparison of size and also the `maxConn` numbers.
--
This is an
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10303?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17458958#comment-17458958
]
Tomoko Uchida commented on LUCENE-10303:
Apache Log4j 2.16.0 is now available.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10303?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17458965#comment-17458965
]
Tomoko Uchida commented on LUCENE-10303:
It seems the concerns and worries on t
27 matches
Mail list logo
