[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9204?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17353119#comment-17353119
]
Jim Ferenczi commented on LUCENE-9204:
--
The rewriting of disjunctions that contains
dweiss commented on pull request #156:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/156#issuecomment-850298459
bq. I don't know how this works
It's simple but not straightforward. The two entries under "publications"
(jars and unsignedJars) cause gradle to create a bunch of convention-
dweiss merged pull request #156:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/156
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please con
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9975?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dawid Weiss resolved LUCENE-9975.
-
Fix Version/s: main (9.0)
Resolution: Fixed
> Don't require artifact signing for local ma
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9975?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17353136#comment-17353136
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-9975:
-
Commi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9975?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17353231#comment-17353231
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-9975:
---
Hi,
I removed the {{-x signJarsPublicatio
rmuir commented on pull request #128:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/128#issuecomment-850330270
> I was finally able to rebuild my local index with wikibigall generating 15
segments, and performed 2 test runs with different threadCount. With 11
threadCount, it took 359.293 sec
rmuir commented on pull request #128:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/128#issuecomment-850335925
> The python tool looks very cool and thanks for testing it! One issue
though is that this bit flipping is causing checksum integrity check failures
before the concurrent segment par
rmuir commented on pull request #128:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/128#issuecomment-850340290
I'm gonna throw out the crazy idea to make `-fast` the new default. The
previous `-slow` could be moved to `-slower` and the previous current behavior
could be activated by `-slow`.
janhoy merged pull request #136:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/136
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please con
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9589?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jan Høydahl resolved LUCENE-9589.
-
Fix Version/s: main (9.0)
Resolution: Fixed
> Swedish Minimal Stemmer
> -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9589?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17353316#comment-17353316
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-9589:
-
Commi
gerlowskija merged pull request #2501:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/2501
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service
dweiss commented on pull request #2499:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/2499#issuecomment-850444097
Hi @donnerpeter ! I think it's a change that is beneficial for folks who use
Hunspell and if you've already put the effort to backport, why not apply it?
--
This is an aut
donnerpeter merged pull request #2499:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/2499
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9687?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17353510#comment-17353510
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-9687:
-
Commi
Nhat Nguyen created LUCENE-9980:
---
Summary: Do not expose deleted commits in
IndexDeletionPolicy#onCommit
Key: LUCENE-9980
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9980
Project: Lucene - Core
dnhatn opened a new pull request #158:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/158
If we fail to delete files that belong to a commit point, then we will
expose that deleted commit in the next calls of
`IndexDeletionPolicy#onCommit()`. I think we should never expose those deleted
commi
dnhatn commented on pull request #158:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/158#issuecomment-850650666
@mikemccand Would you mind taking a look? Thank you!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL
gautamworah96 commented on a change in pull request #138:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/138#discussion_r641822305
##
File path: lucene/facet/src/java/org/apache/lucene/facet/DrillDownQuery.java
##
@@ -170,15 +184,43 @@ private BooleanQuery getBooleanQuery() {
rmuir commented on pull request #2499:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/2499#issuecomment-850699447
I'm sorry i've been nonresponsive, been crazy busy, just came up for air
now. Thank you for backporting this to 8.x! Great improvements to get out there
to the users now.
--
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9945?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sejal Pawar updated LUCENE-9945:
Attachment: LUCENE-9945.patch
> Extend DrillSideways to support exposing FacetCollectors directly
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9945?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sejal Pawar updated LUCENE-9945:
Attachment: (was: LUCENE-9945.patch)
> Extend DrillSideways to support exposing FacetCollector
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9964?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gautam Worah updated LUCENE-9964:
-
Issue Type: Bug (was: Improvement)
> FacetResult.labelValues.value is not accurate for duplicat
sejal-pawar opened a new pull request #159:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/159
# Description
(From [LUCENE-9945](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9945))
The DrillSideways logic currently encapsulates, 1) the creation of multiple
FacetsCollector inst
gsmiller commented on a change in pull request #138:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/138#discussion_r641848546
##
File path: lucene/facet/src/java/org/apache/lucene/facet/DrillDownQuery.java
##
@@ -170,16 +185,36 @@ private BooleanQuery getBooleanQuery() {
retur
gsmiller commented on a change in pull request #159:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/159#discussion_r641852899
##
File path: lucene/facet/src/java/org/apache/lucene/facet/DrillSideways.java
##
@@ -335,10 +342,22 @@ protected boolean scoreSubDocsAtOnce() {
/** Hi
sejal-pawar commented on a change in pull request #159:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/159#discussion_r641856799
##
File path: lucene/facet/src/java/org/apache/lucene/facet/DrillSideways.java
##
@@ -335,10 +342,22 @@ protected boolean scoreSubDocsAtOnce() {
/**
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9945?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17353635#comment-17353635
]
Sejal Pawar commented on LUCENE-9945:
-
Pull request: https://github.com/apache/lucen
sejal-pawar commented on a change in pull request #159:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/159#discussion_r641856799
##
File path: lucene/facet/src/java/org/apache/lucene/facet/DrillSideways.java
##
@@ -335,10 +342,22 @@ protected boolean scoreSubDocsAtOnce() {
/**
Robert Muir created LUCENE-9981:
---
Summary: CompiledAutomaton.getCommonSuffix can be extraordinarily
slow, even with default maxDeterminizedStates limit
Key: LUCENE-9981
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUC
gsmiller commented on a change in pull request #159:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/159#discussion_r641859710
##
File path: lucene/facet/src/java/org/apache/lucene/facet/DrillSideways.java
##
@@ -335,10 +342,22 @@ protected boolean scoreSubDocsAtOnce() {
/** Hi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9981?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-9981:
Attachment: LUCENE-9981_test.patch
> CompiledAutomaton.getCommonSuffix can be extraordinarily slow
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9981?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17353637#comment-17353637
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-9981:
-
Before we {{det(reverse())}} this automaton t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9379?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17353644#comment-17353644
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-9379:
-
Sorry, the above comment is really wrong. Ple
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9379?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17353645#comment-17353645
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-9379:
-
As always, you can count on arch to have some
36 matches
Mail list logo
