soheil-mohseni commented on issue #5771:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/5771#issuecomment-2606513052
Hi
The Link is not valid:
https://github.com/OtherLevels/es_fdr
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to
iverase merged PR #14153:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14153
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apa
iverase closed issue #14143: TestBpVectorReorderer.testIndexReorderDense
failure in CI
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/14143
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific
yugushihuang commented on PR #12828:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12828#issuecomment-2606429556
@jpountz It looks like I do not have push access to the repo. Can you help
me merge it. Thanks!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the mess
Tony-X commented on issue #14148:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/14148#issuecomment-2606036321
`MergeScheduler` can reject or throttle certain merges but I wonder if it
can somehow communicate the constraints to the `MergePolicy` to suggest MP to
produce plausible but not mos
gsmiller commented on code in PR #13974:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13974#discussion_r1924528363
##
lucene/sandbox/src/java/org/apache/lucene/sandbox/search/SortedSetMultiRangeQuery.java:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,300 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (AS
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #14039:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14039#issuecomment-2606012962
This PR has not had activity in the past 2 weeks, labeling it as stale. If
the PR is waiting for review, notify the d...@lucene.apache.org list. Thank you
for your contributi
jpountz commented on PR #14156:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14156#issuecomment-2605738891
> An outright madvise call should be about as expensive as the isLoaded
check when things are already in the page cache
The PR where `consecutivePrefetchHitCount` was introduced ha
iverase commented on PR #14157:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14157#issuecomment-2605433717
I was thinking in a solution more like this:
https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14159. Just open it for discussion, I am
ok if the preferred solution is done at this level.
The
benwtrent opened a new pull request, #14158:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14158
I didn't fully validate TestManyKnnDocs when merging #14084, this reverts
the TestManyKnnDocs changes as it just broke.
closes: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/14149
--
This is
iverase commented on issue #14127:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/14127#issuecomment-2605372405
One possible fix would be to remove neighbours from c1 from the search
result which implies an extra graph seek to collect the neighbours into the
visited nodes.
--
This is an a
msokolov commented on issue #14127:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/14127#issuecomment-2605353284
The thing that complicates this is that the graph is directed - that is its
links are not reciprocal always (although they mostly are), Therefore although
it is true by constructio
iverase commented on issue #14127:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/14127#issuecomment-2605324971
> Thanks for the test case @iverase, but I was able to reliably repro using
the existing test case. These tests are pretty slow so I'd just as soon not add
too many more, unless you
msokolov commented on issue #14127:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/14127#issuecomment-2605301934
Thanks for the test case @iverase, but I was able to reliably repro using
the existing test case. These tests are pretty slow so I'd just as soon not add
too many more, unless you
msokolov opened a new pull request, #14157:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14157
should fix #gh-14127 test failures.
I believe there are no back-compat concerns here since this would be a no-op
for graphs with no duplicates (I think that is what we were always producing
b
RS146BIJAY commented on issue #13387:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/13387#issuecomment-2605229476
Or to elaborate more ```Searching across the N separate shards as if they
were a single index is also possible via MultiReader``` will require separate
Lucene indexes for differe
ChrisHegarty commented on PR #14156:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14156#issuecomment-2604854418
The overhead of `MS::isLoaded` is certainly not a good tradeoff here, as can
be seen from the profile that you posted @original-brownbear. Given the new
code, `consecutivePrefetchH
mikemccand commented on issue #10025:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/10025#issuecomment-2604376572
> > Michael McCandless ([@mikemccand](https://github.com/mikemccand))
([migrated from
JIRA](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8982?focusedCommentId=17223693&page=com.a
ChrisHegarty commented on code in PR #14119:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14119#discussion_r1923394010
##
lucene/backward-codecs/src/java/org/apache/lucene/backward_codecs/lucene92/OffHeapFloatVectorValues.java:
##
@@ -256,7 +256,7 @@ public DocIndexIterator iterat
jpountz merged PR #14135:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14135
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apa
vigyasharma commented on code in PR #14119:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14119#discussion_r1909327166
##
lucene/backward-codecs/src/java/org/apache/lucene/backward_codecs/lucene92/OffHeapFloatVectorValues.java:
##
@@ -256,7 +256,7 @@ public DocIndexIterator iterato
jpountz commented on PR #14139:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14139#issuecomment-2604172940
Thanks @ChrisHegarty
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment
jpountz merged PR #14139:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14139
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apa
jpountz commented on PR #14155:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14155#issuecomment-2604161380
luceneutil on wikibigall:
```
TaskQPS baseline StdDevQPS
my_modified_version StdDevPct diff p-value
jpountz opened a new pull request, #14155:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14155
Currently, blocks of postings get encoded as a bit set instead of packed
deltas (FOR) whenever the bit set is more storage-efficient. However, the bit
set approach is quite more CPU-efficient at sear
25 matches
Mail list logo
