roykyle8 opened a new issue, #13437:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/13437
### Description
I've a project using lucene 2 and trying to upgrade to lucene 9. Following
simple program works in lucene 2.
```
public class CustomMultiFieldQueryParser {
priv
hanqiushi commented on issue #13432:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/13432#issuecomment-2138559678
> What version are you using? Lucene 9.11 introduced concurrent merging to
help speed up merging, see #13124.
Now I'm using 9.9.1 version, I'll check this 9.11 version, than
hanqiushi commented on issue #13432:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/13432#issuecomment-2138552362
> When this is happening (you are waiting for merge) are you continuing to
index new documents, or do you commit() and then during that time not submit
any new docs (ie with Index
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #13370:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13370#issuecomment-2138451221
This PR has not had activity in the past 2 weeks, labeling it as stale. If
the PR is waiting for review, notify the d...@lucene.apache.org list. Thank you
for your contributi
jpountz commented on issue #13179:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/13179#issuecomment-2138323749
> Am I correct in understanding that prefetching an already-fetched page is
(at least approximately) a no-op?
We tried to make it cheap (see e.g. the logic to disable calling
jpountz closed issue #13434: TestIndexWriterOnVMError.testUnknownError fails
with unclosed file handles
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/13434
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to g
jpountz merged PR #13436:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13436
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apa
jpountz commented on code in PR #13436:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13436#discussion_r1619417391
##
lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/index/SegmentDocValues.java:
##
@@ -76,10 +76,12 @@ synchronized DocValuesProducer getDocValuesProducer(
/** Decrement t
bruno-roustant commented on code in PR #13436:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13436#discussion_r1619393930
##
lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/index/SegmentDocValues.java:
##
@@ -76,10 +76,12 @@ synchronized DocValuesProducer getDocValuesProducer(
/** Decr
sohami commented on issue #13179:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/13179#issuecomment-2138104220
> This should work, though I'm wary of making it the new way that collectors
need to interact with doc values if they want to be able to take advantage of
prefetching
To add t
carlosdelest commented on PR #13430:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13430#issuecomment-2138089436
Thanks @mikemccand and @jpountz for your explanations! This is much clearer
now.
I've updated the PR, LMKWYT about the approach!
I'm looking into effective ways of test
msfroh commented on issue #13179:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/13179#issuecomment-2138047304
> This should work, though I'm wary of making it the new way that collectors
need to interact with doc values if they want to be able to take advantage of
prefetching. E.g. we also h
benwtrent commented on code in PR #13436:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13436#discussion_r1619307513
##
lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/index/SegmentDocValues.java:
##
@@ -76,10 +76,12 @@ synchronized DocValuesProducer getDocValuesProducer(
/** Decrement
shatejas commented on PR #13407:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13407#issuecomment-2137932850
For HNSW efSearch is a core parameters during search time. This is
convenient for users to not have to have the logic to strip off top k values on
their end.
Another way is to e
benwtrent commented on PR #13407:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13407#issuecomment-2137917437
I am not overly convinced that this is necessary.
I am not hard and fast against it, I just don't see the need.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To
jpountz opened a new pull request, #13436:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13436
Pull request #13406 inadvertly broke Lucene's handling of tragic exceptions
by stopping after the first `DocValuesProducer` whose `close()` calls throws an
exception, instead of keeping calling `clos
stefanvodita commented on code in PR #13418:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13418#discussion_r1619076421
##
lucene/core/src/test/org/apache/lucene/document/TestIntRange.java:
##
@@ -23,4 +23,16 @@ public void testToString() {
IntRange range = new IntRange("foo",
stefanvodita commented on code in PR #13419:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13419#discussion_r1619067114
##
lucene/core/src/test/org/apache/lucene/analysis/TestWordlistLoader.java:
##
@@ -77,4 +82,17 @@ public void testSnowballListLoading() throws IOException {
benwtrent opened a new issue, #13435:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/13435
### Description
TestFloatVectorSimilarityQuery.testSomeDeletes fails reliably in 9x with:
```
org.apache.lucene.search.TestFloatVectorSimilarityQuery > testSomeDeletes
FAILED
java.lan
benwtrent commented on issue #13434:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/13434#issuecomment-2137471698
Also note,
```
gradlew test --tests TestIndexWriterOnError.testIOError
-Dtests.seed=D02646EAEA66A6CB -Dtests.nightly=true -Dtests.locale=ff-Adlm-BF
-Dtests.timezone=Eur
benwtrent commented on PR #13288:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13288#issuecomment-2137382358
1. No, BitVector format is not in the backwards compatible package.
2. Correct, there have been previous discussions in an effort to add it as a
similarity value, but those conversat
benwtrent commented on issue #13350:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/13350#issuecomment-2137366217
@jmazanec15 this is accounted for in the corrections. The moving from signed
to unsigned is still just a linear transformation, we are not manually flipping
signs, but instead doi
mikemccand commented on PR #13430:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13430#issuecomment-2137365637
Thank you for tackling this @carlosdelest! What a hairy challenge ... TMP
really is its own little baby chess engine, with many things it is trying to
optimize towards (what the ML w
jpountz commented on issue #13432:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/13432#issuecomment-2137311843
What version are you using? Lucene 9.11 introduced concurrent merging to
help speed up merging, see #13124.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond
jpountz commented on PR #13430:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13430#issuecomment-2137276912
> There are at most 2 segment tiers.
Well, there can be more tiers, but since tiers have exponential sizes (e.g.
if you merge factor is 10, each tier has segments that are 10x bigg
easyice opened a new pull request, #13433:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13433
If two objects are different, it might have the same hashcode. in this case,
`Point(-180.0,90.0)` and `Point(180.0,-90.0)` will have the same hashcode
value.
```
org.apache.lucene.geo.Test
benwtrent closed issue #13380: Reproducible failure
TestHnswByteVectorGraph.testSortedAndUnsortedIndicesReturnSameResults
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/13380
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use
benwtrent commented on issue #13380:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/13380#issuecomment-2137189569
closed by https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13361
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
carlosdelest commented on PR #13430:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13430#issuecomment-2137112864
Hi @jpountz , thanks for your thoughts!
Let me check whether I got your suggestion right:
- There are at most 2 segment tiers. The first has `minNumSegments` at most,
the s
stefanvodita commented on code in PR #13417:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13417#discussion_r1618536495
##
lucene/monitor/src/test/org/apache/lucene/monitor/TestSlowLog.java:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,78 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or m
stefanvodita commented on issue #11282:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/11282#issuecomment-2136753263
> Should we just put another "count" field in LabelAndValue and have both
value and count be populated with a count for non-association cases? That
sounds weird.
We did
gf2121 commented on code in PR #13424:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13424#discussion_r1618348032
##
lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/codecs/lucene90/compressing/Lucene90CompressingStoredFieldsReader.java:
##
@@ -609,6 +622,23 @@ public void skipBytes(long num
hanqiushi opened a new issue, #13432:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/13432
### Description
Hi, I have encountered a problem when using lucene in windows.
When I run IndexWriter.commit(), I may wait several minutes for doing
background index merge.
The amount of dat
jpountz commented on code in PR #13424:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13424#discussion_r1618325471
##
lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/codecs/lucene90/compressing/Lucene90CompressingStoredFieldsReader.java:
##
@@ -609,6 +622,23 @@ public void skipBytes(long nu
34 matches
Mail list logo
