easyice merged PR #13314:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13314
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apa
easyice merged PR #13312:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13312
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apa
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #13259:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13259#issuecomment-2062763499
This PR has not had activity in the past 2 weeks, labeling it as stale. If
the PR is waiting for review, notify the d...@lucene.apache.org list. Thank you
for your contributi
vigyasharma commented on PR #13202:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13202#issuecomment-2062496104
Backported to `branch_9x`
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific
vigyasharma commented on PR #13283:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13283#issuecomment-2062495992
Backported to `branch_9x`
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific
vigyasharma commented on PR #13295:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13295#issuecomment-2062493037
Backported changes directly to retain original commit messages. This PR
would've needed a squash merge as it was not rebased on the latest branch_9x
commit.
--
This is an automate
vigyasharma closed pull request #13295: Backport #13202 to branch_9x
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13295
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubsc
jpountz commented on PR #13308:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13308#issuecomment-2062265590
> Oh okay, that means we need to remove support for COSINE just from
indexing side not from searching side?
Correct. Practically, this means keeping the enum constant but marking i
jpountz commented on issue #13313:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/13313#issuecomment-2062229941
FWIW there is a similar problem for sorting by score, as document scores may
be clustered in the doc ID space, which increases the time for the minimum
competitite score to converge
jpountz closed issue #13309: Lucene index modeling - Why are skiplists used
instead of B+ Tree?
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/13309
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the
jpountz commented on issue #13313:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/13313#issuecomment-2062170216
> Lets invoke skipping logic in case topValue is known but bottomvalue is
unknown ir-respective of number of docuements we are able to skip. That will be
one time invocation of skip
jpountz opened a new issue, #13317:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/13317
### Description
I was looking at the [NYC taxis
benchmarks](https://home.apache.org/~mikemccand/lucenebench/sparseResults.html#index_throughput),
where we saw a significant indexing rate regression
benwtrent commented on code in PR #13311:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13311#discussion_r1569381543
##
lucene/core/src/test/org/apache/lucene/search/BaseKnnVectorQueryTestCase.java:
##
@@ -781,7 +781,7 @@ public void testTimeLimitingKnnCollectorManager() throws
IO
vigyasharma commented on code in PR #13311:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13311#discussion_r1569337501
##
lucene/core/src/test/org/apache/lucene/search/BaseKnnVectorQueryTestCase.java:
##
@@ -781,7 +781,7 @@ public void testTimeLimitingKnnCollectorManager() throws
slow-J commented on code in PR #13302:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13302#discussion_r1569215690
##
lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/geo/XYPolygon.java:
##
@@ -187,6 +187,7 @@ public boolean equals(Object obj) {
@Override
public String toString() {
benwtrent commented on PR #13200:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13200#issuecomment-2061818544
usurped by: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13288
closing
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub
benwtrent closed pull request #13200: Add new pluggable vector similarity to
field info
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13200
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific
benwtrent merged PR #13288:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13288
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.a
scampi opened a new pull request, #13315:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13315
- **test: add unit tests to reproduce the IndexOutOfBoundsException in
DefaultPassageFormatter**
- **doc: clarify javadoc of MatchesIterator**
- **fix: sort passages by offset if positions are mi
benwtrent commented on PR #13143:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13143#issuecomment-2061143742
I agree, I think it can be closed. We will still need the `exactSearch`
method, even with refactorings that make it play well with quantization.
--
This is an automated message from
benwtrent commented on code in PR #13311:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13311#discussion_r1568758563
##
lucene/core/src/test/org/apache/lucene/search/BaseKnnVectorQueryTestCase.java:
##
@@ -781,7 +781,7 @@ public void testTimeLimitingKnnCollectorManager() throws
IO
easyice commented on code in PR #13312:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13312#discussion_r1568742254
##
lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/search/TimeLimitingKnnCollectorManager.java:
##
@@ -42,54 +42,62 @@ public KnnCollector newCollector(int visitedLimit,
LeafR
kaivalnp commented on code in PR #13312:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13312#discussion_r1568720556
##
lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/search/TimeLimitingKnnCollectorManager.java:
##
@@ -42,54 +42,62 @@ public KnnCollector newCollector(int visitedLimit,
Leaf
easyice commented on code in PR #13312:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13312#discussion_r1568402988
##
lucene/core/src/test/org/apache/lucene/search/BaseKnnVectorQueryTestCase.java:
##
@@ -784,7 +785,9 @@ public void testTimeLimitingKnnCollectorManager() throws
IOEx
gashutos commented on issue #13313:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/13313#issuecomment-2060591506
@jpountz @gsmiller what you guys think on this ?
let me know if you need sample code change for this
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond
gashutos opened a new issue, #13313:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/13313
### Description
### Background
Lucene sort queries are using skipping logic for faster execution and skip
non-competitive documents by updating its competitive iterator whenever it
updates its
vsop-479 commented on PR #13310:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13310#issuecomment-2060577752
@mikemccand
Please take a look when you get a chance.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
UR
dweiss commented on code in PR #13312:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13312#discussion_r1568342142
##
lucene/core/src/test/org/apache/lucene/search/BaseKnnVectorQueryTestCase.java:
##
@@ -784,7 +785,9 @@ public void testTimeLimitingKnnCollectorManager() throws
IOExc
28 matches
Mail list logo
