Jan Dornseifer created LUCENE-10615:
---
Summary: Add license information for SmartChineseAnalyzer to
NOTICE.txt
Key: LUCENE-10615
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10615
Project: Lucen
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10598?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17553895#comment-17553895
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-10598:
--
Co
LuXugang merged PR #942:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/942
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache
shaie commented on PR #841:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/841#issuecomment-1154701271
I pushed some more cleanups and minor refactoring.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go
mdmarshmallow commented on PR #841:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/841#issuecomment-1154629173
I agree with Greg, we should not let benchmarking block releasing this. I
pushed a commit to remove the `byte[]` matches API
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Servi
gsmiller commented on code in PR #914:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/914#discussion_r896240300
##
lucene/facet/src/java/org/apache/lucene/facet/LongValueFacetCounts.java:
##
@@ -346,6 +346,43 @@ private void increment(long value) {
}
}
+ @Override
+ publ
Greg Miller created LUCENE-10614:
Summary: Properly support getTopChildren in RangeFacetCounts
Key: LUCENE-10614
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10614
Project: Lucene - Core
jtibshirani commented on PR #956:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/956#issuecomment-1154554441
Thank you @mocobeta for leading the change to allow GitHub issues in
CHANGES.txt -- this was very convenient to fix compared to before.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache
jtibshirani opened a new pull request, #956:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/956
Before, the rewritten query DocAndScoreQuery ignored the boost.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above
gsmiller commented on PR #954:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/954#issuecomment-1154550479
@jpountz:
> plus there may be lots of users doing old-style iteration so we'll need to
deprecate and maybe only clean this up in 10.0 or 11.0
Right, makes sense.
> But I'm c
jtibshirani commented on code in PR #951:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/951#discussion_r896012687
##
lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/search/KnnVectorQuery.java:
##
@@ -92,20 +91,40 @@ public KnnVectorQuery(String field, float[] target, int k,
Query filter) {
shahrs87 commented on code in PR #907:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/907#discussion_r896006974
##
lucene/codecs/src/java/org/apache/lucene/codecs/bloom/BloomFilteringPostingsFormat.java:
##
@@ -200,8 +200,8 @@ public Terms terms(String field) throws IOException {
dweiss commented on code in PR #927:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/927#discussion_r895987477
##
build.gradle:
##
@@ -183,3 +183,5 @@ apply from: file('gradle/hacks/turbocharge-jvm-opts.gradle')
apply from: file('gradle/hacks/dummy-outputs.gradle')
apply from: fi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10613?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17553740#comment-17553740
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-10613:
--
Co
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10613?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17553741#comment-17553741
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-10613:
--
Co
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10613?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dawid Weiss resolved LUCENE-10613.
--
Assignee: Dawid Weiss
Resolution: Fixed
> Clean up outdated NOTICE.txt information conc
Deepika0510 commented on code in PR #927:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/927#discussion_r895985779
##
lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/search/IndexSearcher.java:
##
@@ -766,18 +778,29 @@ protected void search(List leaves,
Weight weight, Collector c
}
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10613?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dawid Weiss updated LUCENE-10613:
-
Fix Version/s: 9.3
> Clean up outdated NOTICE.txt information concerning morfologik
> -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10613?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dawid Weiss updated LUCENE-10613:
-
Description: It's been pointed out to me that NOTICE.txt contains
information about licensing t
Dawid Weiss created LUCENE-10613:
Summary: Clean up outdated NOTICE.txt information concerning
morfologik
Key: LUCENE-10613
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10613
Project: Lucene - Co
shahrs87 commented on PR #897:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/897#issuecomment-1154177806
Thank you @jpountz for the review and merge. :)
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go
jpountz commented on PR #954:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/954#issuecomment-1154152474
We'll have to wait to clean up indeed, plus there may be lots of users doing
old-style iteration so we'll need to deprecate and maybe only clean this up in
10.0 or 11.0. But I'm curious of t
gsmiller commented on PR #954:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/954#issuecomment-1154150491
@jpountz +1 to testing this. Good call! Since I only tackled a subset of
code accessing `NO_MORE_DOCS`, I think we'll have to wait to clean this up and
test though right?
--
This is an a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10078?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17553697#comment-17553697
]
Adrien Grand commented on LUCENE-10078:
---
As expected, this slowed down refresh la
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10266?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Adrien Grand resolved LUCENE-10266.
---
Fix Version/s: 10.0 (main)
Resolution: Fixed
> Move nearest-neighbor search on point
jpountz merged PR #897:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/897
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.
jpountz commented on PR #897:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/897#issuecomment-1154147639
Thanks @shahrs87 !
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To u
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10266?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17553702#comment-17553702
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-10266:
--
Co
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10527?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17553699#comment-17553699
]
Adrien Grand commented on LUCENE-10527:
---
I pushed an annotation to nightly benchm
gsmiller commented on PR #841:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/841#issuecomment-1154143249
Ah, sorry... I accidentally hit the "close" button! My bad. Reopened.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and us
gsmiller closed pull request #841: LUCENE-10274: Add hyperrectangle faceting
capabilities
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/841
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific
gsmiller commented on PR #841:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/841#issuecomment-1154142817
> Anyway, let's benchmark it, but with the analysis above, I also agree we
should actually start with the long[] API, and replace it with a byte[] one
only if actually performs better.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10611?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17553675#comment-17553675
]
Julie Tibshirani commented on LUCENE-10611:
---
Thanks for catching this [~kaiva
anshumg merged PR #2663:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/2663
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.
msokolov commented on code in PR #927:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/927#discussion_r895817658
##
build.gradle:
##
@@ -183,3 +183,5 @@ apply from: file('gradle/hacks/turbocharge-jvm-opts.gradle')
apply from: file('gradle/hacks/dummy-outputs.gradle')
apply from:
anshumg opened a new pull request, #2663:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/2663
Added more people to CHANGES to include folks who contributed to reviewing
this fix. Will updated the CHANGES in main and 9x too.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10612?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17553593#comment-17553593
]
Elia Porciani edited comment on LUCENE-10612 at 6/13/22 1:54 PM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10612?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17553593#comment-17553593
]
Elia Porciani edited comment on LUCENE-10612 at 6/13/22 1:54 PM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10612?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17553593#comment-17553593
]
Elia Porciani commented on LUCENE-10612:
However, I understand the concern abou
eliaporciani opened a new pull request, #955:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/955
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10612
# Description
Lucene93Codec should provide a way for providing custom parameters to
HnswVectorsFormat
# Solution
For providi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8193?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17553541#comment-17553541
]
Andras Salamon commented on LUCENE-8193:
This looks like a duplicate of LUCENE-8
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10612?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17553518#comment-17553518
]
Elia Porciani commented on LUCENE-10612:
Actually, the change I'm proposing is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10612?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17553499#comment-17553499
]
Adrien Grand commented on LUCENE-10612:
---
We have been rejecting such requests in
Elia Porciani created LUCENE-10612:
--
Summary: Add parameters for HNSW codec in Lucene93Codec
Key: LUCENE-10612
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10612
Project: Lucene - Core
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10480?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17553494#comment-17553494
]
Adrien Grand commented on LUCENE-10480:
---
Good question, looking at your BlockMaxM
jpountz commented on code in PR #950:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/950#discussion_r895527360
##
lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/search/BooleanWeight.java:
##
@@ -344,6 +344,45 @@ public BulkScorer bulkScorer(LeafReaderContext context)
throws IOException {
jpountz commented on code in PR #950:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/950#discussion_r895526857
##
lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/search/BooleanWeight.java:
##
@@ -344,6 +344,45 @@ public BulkScorer bulkScorer(LeafReaderContext context)
throws IOException {
jpountz commented on PR #954:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/954#issuecomment-1153675730
@gsmiller I wonder if you could also test if there is a speed up if we
remove checks that the codec has to do in order to make sure to return
`NO_MORE_ORDS` when values for a doc are exhaust
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10611?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kaival Parikh updated LUCENE-10611:
---
Description:
The HNSW graph search does not consider that visitedLimit may be reached in th
jpountz commented on code in PR #951:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/951#discussion_r895488795
##
lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/search/KnnVectorQuery.java:
##
@@ -92,20 +91,40 @@ public KnnVectorQuery(String field, float[] target, int k,
Query filter) {
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10611?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17553467#comment-17553467
]
Kaival Parikh commented on LUCENE-10611:
As a fix, we can check if results are
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10611?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kaival Parikh updated LUCENE-10611:
---
Description:
The HNSW graph search does not consider that visitedLimit may be reached in th
Kaival Parikh created LUCENE-10611:
--
Summary: KnnVectorQuery throwing Heap Error for Restrictive Filters
Key: LUCENE-10611
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10611
Project: Lucene - Cor
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10611?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kaival Parikh updated LUCENE-10611:
---
Description:
The HNSW graph search does not consider that visitedLimit may be reached in th
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10078?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17553416#comment-17553416
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-10078:
--
Co
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10078?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17553417#comment-17553417
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-10078:
--
Co
56 matches
Mail list logo
