spyk commented on pull request #380:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/380#issuecomment-989601844
Thanks @magibney! Yes, makes sense, I'll add a commit for the redundant
parsing code removal and add a TODO comment as suggested.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10297?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Feng Guo updated LUCENE-10297:
--
Description:
We already have a bitset optimization for low cardinality fields, but the
optimization
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10297?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Feng Guo updated LUCENE-10297:
--
Description:
We already have a bitset optimization for low cardinality fields, but the
optimization
gf2121 edited a comment on pull request #510:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/510#issuecomment-989104054
@iverase Thanks for your explanation!
> I worked on the PR about using #readLELongs but never get a meaningful
speed up that justify the added complexity.
I find
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10297?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Feng Guo updated LUCENE-10297:
--
Description:
We already have a bitset optimization for low cardinality fields, but the
optimization
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10297?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Feng Guo updated LUCENE-10297:
--
Description:
We already have a bitset optimization for low cardinality fields, but the
optimization
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10297?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Feng Guo updated LUCENE-10297:
--
Summary: Speed up medium cardinality fields with readLongs and SIMD (was:
Speed up medium cardinalit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10297?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Feng Guo updated LUCENE-10297:
--
Description:
We already have a bitset optimization for low cardinality fields, but the
optimization
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10297?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Feng Guo updated LUCENE-10297:
--
Description:
We already have a bitset optimization for low cardinality fields, but the
optimization
gf2121 edited a comment on pull request #510:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/510#issuecomment-989104054
@iverase Thanks for your explanation!
> I worked on the PR about using #readLELongs but never get a meaningful
speed up that justify the added complexity.
I find
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10296?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir resolved LUCENE-10296.
--
Fix Version/s: 10.0 (main)
Resolution: Fixed
> Stop minimizing regexps
> -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10289?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir reopened LUCENE-10289:
--
I re opened the issue due to perf regressions:
LUCENE-10299
> DocIdSetBuilder#grow() should tak
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10299?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17456112#comment-17456112
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-10299:
--
fairly heavy cost on the MTQ-rewrite happe
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10296?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17456106#comment-17456106
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-10296:
--
Co
rmuir merged pull request #528:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/528
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@
rmuir commented on pull request #528:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/528#issuecomment-989454186
LUCENE-10296: Stop minimizing regexps
In current trunk, we let caller (e.g. `RegExpQuery`) try to "reduce" the
expression. The parser nor the low-level executors don't implicit
rmuir commented on pull request #528:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/528#issuecomment-989427375
I'm waiting a bit on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10299 . I
don't expect any regression, but I don't want to confuse it with the
`DocIdSetBuilder` stuff
--
This is
thelabdude merged pull request #2626:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/2626
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-
gsmiller commented on pull request #498:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/498#issuecomment-989310001
Nice change! (Just now catching up on some Lucene issues and saw this)
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to Gi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10281?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17456048#comment-17456048
]
Greg Miller commented on LUCENE-10281:
--
Yeah, +1 to not considering this a bug (bu
uschindler commented on pull request #310:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/310#issuecomment-989287677
Hi @jnorthrup, I do not fully understand what you are intending to do? If
you want to compare the LZ4 to LZO/ZSTD just run Mike's benchmarks.
Me main reason for this PR is to
jnorthrup commented on pull request #310:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/310#issuecomment-989246505
hi @uschindler are there analogs for lzo and zstd for which this benchmark
can be used to address the ever present IO budget and cache line costs of the
different libs ? (benchma
dweiss commented on pull request #470:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/470#issuecomment-989200591
I've pushed another bit of exploration and I think it shows we're close.
Many things can be cleaned up nicely later (modular configurations generated
from sourcesets, including comp
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10274?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17455994#comment-17455994
]
Greg Miller commented on LUCENE-10274:
--
{quote}I would also suggest to start with
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10299?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17455991#comment-17455991
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-10299:
--
Here are the list of commits in between th
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10274?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17455990#comment-17455990
]
Greg Miller edited comment on LUCENE-10274 at 12/8/21, 9:05 PM:
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10299?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-10299:
-
Description:
Recently the prefix/wildcard dropped. As these are super simple and not
impacted
Robert Muir created LUCENE-10299:
Summary: investigate prefix/wildcard perf drop in nightly
benchmarks
Key: LUCENE-10299
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10299
Project: Lucene - Core
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10274?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17455990#comment-17455990
]
Greg Miller commented on LUCENE-10274:
--
I was thinking that this would work over t
thelabdude opened a new pull request #2626:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/2626
backport of https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/451
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10298?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17455952#comment-17455952
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-10298:
Or maybe write the index names to a si
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10040?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17455949#comment-17455949
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-10040:
--
Co
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10040?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17455944#comment-17455944
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-10040:
--
Co
jtibshirani merged pull request #527:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/527
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubs
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10040?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Julie Tibshirani resolved LUCENE-10040.
---
Fix Version/s: 9.0
Resolution: Fixed
> Handle deletions in nearest vector se
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10298?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17455935#comment-17455935
]
Dawid Weiss commented on LUCENE-10298:
--
I wouldn't make such exceptions. They're h
gf2121 commented on pull request #510:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/510#issuecomment-989104054
@iverase Thanks for your explanation!
> I worked on the PR about using #readLELongs but never get a meaningful
speed up that justify the added complexity.
I find that w
Adrien Grand created LUCENE-10298:
-
Summary: dev-tools/scripts/addBackcompatIndexes.py doesn't work
well with spotless
Key: LUCENE-10298
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10298
Project
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10297?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Feng Guo updated LUCENE-10297:
--
Description:
We already have a bitset optimization for low cardinality fields, but the
optimization
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10297?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Feng Guo updated LUCENE-10297:
--
Description:
We already have a bitset optimization for low cardinality fields, but the
optimization
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10297?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Feng Guo updated LUCENE-10297:
--
Description:
We already have a bitset optimization for low cardinality fields, but the
optimization
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10297?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Feng Guo updated LUCENE-10297:
--
Description:
We already have a bitset optimization for low cardinality fields, but the
optimization
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9484?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Adrien Grand closed LUCENE-9484.
> Allow index sorting to happen after the fact
>
>
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9484?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Adrien Grand resolved LUCENE-9484.
--
Resolution: Fixed
> Allow index sorting to happen after the fact
> ---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10114?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Adrien Grand closed LUCENE-10114.
-
> Remove unused byte order mark in Lucene90PostingsWriter
> ---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10114?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Adrien Grand resolved LUCENE-10114.
---
Resolution: Fixed
> Remove unused byte order mark in Lucene90PostingsWriter
> -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10040?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17455386#comment-17455386
]
Julie Tibshirani commented on LUCENE-10040:
---
Thanks for posting, I found Weav
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10259?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Adrien Grand updated LUCENE-10259:
--
Fix Version/s: (was: 9.x)
> Luke does not start with whitespace in unzipped directory.
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10287?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Adrien Grand updated LUCENE-10287:
--
Fix Version/s: (was: 9.x)
> Add jdk.unsupported module to Luke startup script
> -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10297?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Feng Guo updated LUCENE-10297:
--
Description:
We already have a bitset optimization for low cardinality fields, but the
optimization
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10297?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Feng Guo updated LUCENE-10297:
--
Description:
We already have a bitset optimization for low cardinality fields, but the
optimization
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10297?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Feng Guo updated LUCENE-10297:
--
Description:
We already have a bitset optimization for low cardinality fields, but the
optimization
mikemccand commented on pull request #906:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/906#issuecomment-988978401
Hmm, I see this [src fix was committed, but the new unit test was not
committed](https://github.com/apache/lucene/commit/49631ace9f1ee110d52a207377e4926baef74929)
-- was th
mikemccand closed pull request #1064:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/1064
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-
mikemccand commented on pull request #1064:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/1064#issuecomment-988973336
It looks like this one was indeed merged -- closing the PR. Thank you
@paulward24!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the messa
magibney commented on pull request #380:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/380#issuecomment-988928174
Thanks for the nudge, @fmmoret.
I think if introducing this change, we should really avoid [needlessly
building and throwing
away](https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/380
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10297?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Feng Guo updated LUCENE-10297:
--
Description:
We already have a bitset optimization for low cardinality fields, but the
optimization
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10297?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Feng Guo updated LUCENE-10297:
--
Description:
We already have a bitset optimization for low cardinality fields, but the
optimization
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10297?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Feng Guo updated LUCENE-10297:
--
Description:
We already have a bitset optimization for low cardinality fields, but the
optimization
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10297?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Feng Guo updated LUCENE-10297:
--
Description:
We already have a bitset optimization for low cardinality fields, but the
optimization
dweiss commented on a change in pull request #521:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/521#discussion_r764938074
##
File path:
lucene/queries/src/java/org/apache/lucene/queries/intervals/Intervals.java
##
@@ -275,7 +275,10 @@ public static IntervalsSource ordered(Interv
janhoy closed pull request #740:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/740
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubs
janhoy closed pull request #690:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/690
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubs
janhoy closed pull request #185:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/185
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubs
janhoy closed pull request #182:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/182
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubs
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10297?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Feng Guo updated LUCENE-10297:
--
Description:
We already have a bitset optimization for low cardinality fields, but the
optimization
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10297?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Feng Guo updated LUCENE-10297:
--
Description:
We already have a bitset optimization for low cardinality fields, but the
optimization
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10297?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Feng Guo updated LUCENE-10297:
--
Description:
We already have a bitset optimization for low cardinality fields, but the
optimization
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10297?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Feng Guo updated LUCENE-10297:
--
Description:
Though we already have a bitset optimization for low cardinality fields, but
the optimi
rmuir commented on pull request #2625:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/2625#issuecomment-988760471
That's an actual veto. justification: read the fucking mailing list thread,
see how @janhoy tried to "slip this in" under the pretense of a +1. Several of
us are against bulk-
rmuir commented on pull request #2625:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/2625#issuecomment-988751134
-1 to adding bulk close functionality
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10297?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Feng Guo updated LUCENE-10297:
--
Description:
Though we already have a bitset optimization for low cardinality fields, but
the optimi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10297?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Feng Guo updated LUCENE-10297:
--
Description:
Though we already have a bitset optimization for low cardinality fields, but
the optimi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10297?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Feng Guo updated LUCENE-10297:
--
Description:
Though we already have a bitset optimization for low cardinality fields, but
the optimi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10297?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Feng Guo updated LUCENE-10297:
--
Description:
Though we already have a bitset optimization for low cardinality fields, but
the optimi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10297?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Feng Guo updated LUCENE-10297:
--
Description:
Though we already have a bitset optimization for low cardinality fields, but
the optimi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10297?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Feng Guo updated LUCENE-10297:
--
Description:
Though we already have a bitset optimization for low cardinality fields, but
the optimi
janhoy opened a new pull request #2625:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/2625
Example use:
```bash
./githubPRs.py \
--bulkclose "Lucene and Solr development has moved to separate git
repositories and this PR is being bulk-closed. Please open a new PR against
h
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10297?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Feng Guo updated LUCENE-10297:
--
Description:
Though we already have a bitset optimization for low cardinality fields, but
the optimi
gf2121 opened a new pull request #530:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/530
see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10297
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the s
Feng Guo created LUCENE-10297:
-
Summary: Speed up medium cardinality fields with readLELongs and
SIMD
Key: LUCENE-10297
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10297
Project: Lucene - Core
janhoy closed pull request #1364:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/1364
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsu
janhoy commented on pull request #1364:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/1364#issuecomment-988681951
Lucene and Solr development has moved to separate git repositories and this
PR is being bulk-closed.\nPlease open a new PR against
https://github.com/apache/solr or https://g
83 matches
Mail list logo
