github-actions[bot] commented on issue #1439:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/issues/1439#issuecomment-3054582828
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has been open
for 180 days with no activity. It will be closed in next 14 days if no further
activity
kevinjqliu commented on issue #1439:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/issues/1439#issuecomment-2583675951
> have we ever considered taking an approach similar (at a high-level, of
course - some details don't transfer over to Python) to the Java-side that has
[CatalogTests](htt
smaheshwar-pltr commented on issue #1439:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/issues/1439#issuecomment-2582725070
(New to PyIceberg, so just spitballing here 😄)
@kevinjqliu, have we ever considered taking an approach similar (at a
high-level, of course - some details don't
AhmedNader42 commented on issue #1439:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/issues/1439#issuecomment-2549892936
Sounds good! Yes, I'll work on it
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above
kevinjqliu commented on issue #1439:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/issues/1439#issuecomment-2549887131
> My current approach would be to migrate the test_rest.py unit tests from
mock to the integration test
I think thats a great first step! Generally, testing via mock
kevinjqliu opened a new issue, #1439:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/issues/1439
### Feature Request / Improvement
#1434 created `tests/integration/test_rest_catalog.py` for integration tests
with the REST catalog. Previously REST catalog tests were using mocked request
