What's Google" as they do with Qt.
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2019 at 12:03 AM
From: "Vlad Stelmahovsky"
To: interest@qt-project.org
Subject: Re: [Interest] vs. Flutter
if you guys already did some code for mobiles, why dont just contribute back?
On 2/20/19 3:32 AM,
instead person-years are being wasted.
>
>
> *Sent:* Tuesday, February 19, 2019 at 8:09 PM
> *From:* "Jérôme Godbout"
> *To:* "Lorne Sturtevant" ,
> "interest@qt-project.org"
>
> *Subject:* Re: [Interest] vs. Flutter
>
> I did
d.
*Sent:* Tuesday, February 19, 2019 at 8:09 PM
*From:* "Jérôme Godbout"
*To:* "Lorne Sturtevant" , "interest@qt-project.org"
*Subject:* Re: [Interest] vs. Flutter
I did try a bit V-Play, but I did not like the fact I was stuck at a
particular Qt version (it was
ime again. This is not "code less create more". A few weeks of a couple developers and this would be a completely different situation instead person-years are being wasted.
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2019 at 8:09 PM
From: "Jérôme Godbout"
To: "Lorne Sturtevant"
seem to be fine
aside from that problems. The price is a hard pill to swallow, with Qt 3D I
guess the V-Play was less future proof I guess.
From: Interest On Behalf Of Lorne Sturtevant
Sent: February 19, 2019 7:04 PM
To: interest@qt-project.org
Subject: Re: [Interest] vs. Flutter
On 2019-02-19 3
On 2019-02-19 3:22 p.m., Jason H wrote:
Was just reading the blog and it mentions live
reloading: https://blog.qt.io/blog/2019/02/18/scaling-large-ui-development-projects-managing-complexities-reference-ui-neptune-3/
This Neptune3 thing, is that something we can use on the phones?
I've been fol
On Wed, 20 Feb 2019 at 00:33, Jason H wrote:
> Also, FWIW, I don't know why PySide didn't take up Riverbank's PyQt. So now
> we have Mobile and Python fragmentation in Qt.
They did try, but couldn't reach an agreement with Riverbank:
https://wiki.qt.io/PySide_FAQ (see "What About PyQt?")
PyQt i
: "René Hansen"
To: "Jason H"
Cc: inter...@lists.qt-project.org
Subject: Re: [Interest] vs. Flutter
I've not come across any myself, and have only built a few small things with it a bit for now.
Initial reactions was that it is *leagues* ahead of Qt with regards to dev
st C++ has the 3 year release cycle. Qt's future is murky though without a dedicated roadmap.
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2019 at 10:14 PM
From: "Fabio Giovagnini"
To: fro...@tungware.se
Cc: Qt-interest
Subject: Re: [Interest] vs. Flutter
My two cents. The main topic is:
ject.org
Subject: Re: [Interest] vs. Flutter
I am personally not convinced yet about having a _javascript_ VM. It seems to be a bottleneck.
However I see the advantages it brings, but was it really necessary?
Le mar. 19 févr. 2019 à 21:15, Christoph Feck <cf...@kde.org> a écrit :
uesday, February 19, 2019 at 9:13 PM
> From: "Christoph Feck"
> To: inter...@lists.qt-project.org
> Subject: Re: [Interest] vs. Flutter
>
> On 02/19/19 20:47, Jason H wrote:
> > What I've learned is that it's better to stand on the shoulders of giants
> >
My two cents. The main topic is: a new language really has to give an
answer to a real need. In my humble opinion when we talk about programming
language, we cannot think to push artificial needs. The community of
developers is not a commumitiy of fashion guys. They are professionals
working to m
I am personally not convinced yet about having a javascript VM. It seems to
be a bottleneck.
However I see the advantages it brings, but was it really necessary?
Le mar. 19 févr. 2019 à 21:15, Christoph Feck a écrit :
> On 02/19/19 20:47, Jason H wrote:
> > What I've learned is that it's better
Hi, totally agree C/C++ will outlive many of these new languages.
It's also most likely Javascript will wane off sooner rather than later
due to WebAssembly steadily improving.
Been working/programming for 43 years now, while I fondly remember
Pascal on CP/M from my youth (before C++ was inven
On 02/19/19 20:47, Jason H wrote:
What I've learned is that it's better to stand on the shoulders of giants than to rewrite
the universe from scratch. I dream of a say where we can code things and everyone else
regardless of platform can run it. I thought this was going to be .Net CLR, or Java
for these new toolkits to wrap platform APIs, but Qt remains the
only one to successfully* abstract them.
* platform parity issues persist.
> Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2019 at 6:42 PM
> From: "Bob Hood"
> To: "René Hansen" , "Jason H"
> Cc: inter...@
lot. At least QML manages that for you. QML is the sleekest of all the declarative languages.
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2019 at 12:55 PM
From: "Bernhard B"
To: "Bob Hood"
Cc: "René Hansen" , "Jason H" , inter...@lists.qt-project.org
Subject: Re: [
> I've been studying it for a while now, and I've decided that it will
likely be
my mobile development language. I love Qt to death for desktop, but I've
never been able to take to it's declarative approach. I know others swear
by
it, but it just never fit my brain waves for some reason.
I gues
On 2/18/2019 7:40 AM, René Hansen wrote:
I've not come across any myself, and have only built a few small things with
it a bit for now.
Initial reactions was that it is *leagues* ahead of Qt with regards to
developer experience. You're not locked to an IDE, like with QtCreator, and
the ui liv
osystem in order. With Google entering the x-platform
> marketplace about the hopes Qt has is to somehow deliver better than
> Google, or hope that Flutter is fleeting. Google has been a little ADHD
> with projects, so... maybe?
>
>
>
> > Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2019 at 10:5
be?
> Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2019 at 10:50 AM
> From: "Jereme Givens- Lamothe"
> To: "interest@qt-project.org"
> Cc: "Jason H"
> Subject: Re: [Interest] vs. Flutter
>
> Does something like the (recently rebranded) Felgo address any of your
&g
t-project.org
Subject: Re: [Interest] vs. Flutter
Many thanks for all those who replied.
> I've not come across any myself, and have only built a few small things with
> it a bit for now.
>
> Initial reactions was that it is *leagues* ahead of Qt with regards to
> developer exper
Many thanks for all those who replied.
> I've not come across any myself, and have only built a few small things with
> it a bit for now.
>
> Initial reactions was that it is *leagues* ahead of Qt with regards to
> developer experience. You're not locked to an IDE, like with QtCreator, and
>
> 19.02.2019, 15:27, "Vlad Stelmahovsky" :
> > QtMultimedia cant be less power than GStreamer, because QtMultimedia on
> > linux uses gstreamer as backend :)
>
> It's less powerful because its API provides lowest common denominator of all
> media backends
Well when dealing with x-platform apps
19.02.2019, 15:27, "Vlad Stelmahovsky" :
> QtMultimedia cant be less power than GStreamer, because QtMultimedia on linux
> uses gstreamer as backend :)
It's less powerful because its API provides lowest common denominator of all
media backends
> However I'd like to see there something like cu
On Tue, 19 Feb 2019 at 06:58 Shawn Rutledge wrote:
> On Feb 18, 2019, at 17:18, René Hansen wrote:
>
> On Mon, 18 Feb 2019 at 16:27 Shawn Rutledge wrote:
>
>>
>> > On 18 Feb 2019, at 15:40, René Hansen wrote:
>>
>
>> > Achitecturally it's similar to Qt, in that they've build a custom
>> render
QtMultimedia cant be less power than GStreamer, because QtMultimedia on
linux uses gstreamer as backend :)
However I'd like to see there something like custom pipeline provider to
Gstreamer it would be really useful for different usecases
br,
Vlad
On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 9:39 PM Christian Gagner
On Feb 18, 2019, at 17:18, René Hansen
mailto:ren...@gmail.com>> wrote:
On Mon, 18 Feb 2019 at 16:27 Shawn Rutledge
mailto:shawn.rutle...@qt.io>> wrote:
> On 18 Feb 2019, at 15:40, René Hansen
> mailto:ren...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> Achitecturally it's similar to Qt, in that they've build a cus
I asked a question about this during the Qt Virtual Tech summit. It seems that
The Qt Company acknowledges that Qt is being used for mobile more and more. I
asked to Lars Knoll If there were plans to invest more in mobile to bring some
native functionality, and he said that there are plans but i
On Tue, 19 Feb 2019 at 02:57, Jason H wrote:
>
> Are there any good Qt vs Google Flutter comparisons?
> I took a brief look, it looked like a declarative JS framework. Usually the
> difference with between Qt and the competition is Qt abstracts there platform
> libraries (i.e. Gstreamer vs avfou
Just out of curiosity: Does the recent flutter 1.0 release have an impact
on Qt's strategic orientation? Is flutter seen as a direct competitor to
Qt? Will there be more/less focus on Qt mobile?
I recently had to re-evaluate whether I want to want to stay with Qt for
mobile applications or if I sh
On Mon, 18 Feb 2019 at 16:27 Shawn Rutledge wrote:
>
> > On 18 Feb 2019, at 15:40, René Hansen wrote:
> >
> > I've not come across any myself, and have only built a few small things
> with it a bit for now.
> >
> > Initial reactions was that it is *leagues* ahead of Qt with regards to
> develope
> On 18 Feb 2019, at 15:40, René Hansen wrote:
>
> I've not come across any myself, and have only built a few small things with
> it a bit for now.
>
> Initial reactions was that it is *leagues* ahead of Qt with regards to
> developer experience. You're not locked to an IDE, like with QtCreat
I've not come across any myself, and have only built a few small things
with it a bit for now.
Initial reactions was that it is *leagues* ahead of Qt with regards to
developer experience. You're not locked to an IDE, like with QtCreator, and
the ui live updates across device, simulators, emulators
Are there any good Qt vs Google Flutter comparisons?
I took a brief look, it looked like a declarative JS framework. Usually the
difference with between Qt and the competition is Qt abstracts there platform
libraries (i.e. Gstreamer vs avfoundation vs directshow)
_
35 matches
Mail list logo
