I am personally not convinced yet about having a javascript VM. It seems to be a bottleneck. However I see the advantages it brings, but was it really necessary?
Le mar. 19 févr. 2019 à 21:15, Christoph Feck <cf...@kde.org> a écrit : > On 02/19/19 20:47, Jason H wrote: > > What I've learned is that it's better to stand on the shoulders of > giants than to rewrite the universe from scratch. I dream of a say where we > can code things and everyone else regardless of platform can run it. I > thought this was going to be .Net CLR, or Java VM, but corporate ownership > initiatives derailed them (Much like the "You will" ATT ads of the 90s - we > got it, but not from ATT). But C/C++ runs all more platforms/processors. > Linux has come a long way in terms of bringing all CPUs a usable software > ecosystem. And this though rather obtuse is one reason to pick Qt - that > it'll support any system that can run a C++ compiler. You don't technically > need to use QML, you can keep going with C++. > > Once upon a time a mother of two curious boys called me, asking me to > teach them programming. They have no clue what language to start with, > so I suggested C as a base, to later learn Python, C++, Java (or C#). > Then some "smart" student told one of the kids "JavaScript is da future > of da Internetz". I stopped teaching them after it was suggested to > stop the C course and swap it for a JavaScript course. > > C/C++ will be relevant in the future. All other languages will come and > go (no pun intended). > > Whether Qt will be relevant in the future lies in the hands of its > developers. Don't ruin it. > > Christoph Feck > > _______________________________________________ > Interest mailing list > Interest@qt-project.org > https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/interest >
_______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/interest
