I can second total view; also a decent unix ide is "visual slickedit".. not
that id encourage such things but both are easy to crack with a LD_PRELOAD
of gettimeofday () iirc (holds true with basically all unix for-profit
software)
On Apr 10, 2013 9:05 PM, "Alex Malyushytskyy" wrote:
> Danny,
>
>
hi,
On Apr 10, 2013 5:50 PM, "Thiago Macieira"
wrote:
>
> First of all, let me apologise for my behaviour in the thread on
"dependency
> bloat". I've re-read my first reply and it was clearly out of line. And
the
> number of off-ML messages I got also indicates that.
same.
> So, my deepest apol
On Apr 10, 2013 4:22 PM, "Bob Hood" wrote:
>
> On 4/10/2013 2:52 PM, Justin Ferguson wrote:
> > Support will always suck for that platform.
>
> Please don't make disturbing statements like that. Ifthat were actually
true,
> then it hugely discounts Qt a
a "Kickstarter" like process. if those of us
who want to get rid of Perl are willing to cough up some money I bet we
_could_ foot the bill to make the conversion from Perl to C++. Who we get
to do it is up for discussion. There are more than a few Qt Devs that need
the extra work.
> > &g
l to make the conversion from Perl to C++. Who we get to do it
> is up for discussion. There are more than a few Qt Devs that need the extra
> work.
>
> Just food for thought. (Trying to help find a solution instead of just
> bitching...)
> ---
> Mike J.
>
> PS - Yes I t
>And yes: The best way would be a >mail to the commercial support...
I've always had a severe distaste for those sorts of arguments that turn
OSS/FS into a form of semi-crippled shareware where if i want it to work i
have to pay; which often enough turns into "travel insurance": insured
against al
>I think you made a mistake and sent >this email to an opensource
>project's mailing list instead of to >your Sysadmin.
The right answer is not always popular and the popular answer isn't always
right.
Saying "we are OSS" isn't an adequate excuse for broken.
On Apr 10, 2013 3:16 PM, "Sergio Ahuma
d error prone; or is
there a synchronous QNAM-like class? Having to reimplement the HTTP
code in a qtcpsocket seems counter-productive and qhttp is apparently
deprecated.
Best Regards,
Justin N. Ferguson
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 6:30 PM, Justin Ferguson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm running into
Hi,
I'm running into an issue in an application that I so far cannot
totally adequately explain why its occurring; I'm not posting any code
in this email simply because I want to describe the issue and see if
there is anything obvious I am missing when trying to debug the issue
and then failing th
