>And yes: The best way would be a >mail to the commercial support... I've always had a severe distaste for those sorts of arguments that turn OSS/FS into a form of semi-crippled shareware where if i want it to work i have to pay; which often enough turns into "travel insurance": insured against all the reasons you probably wont miss your flight (acts of god v. Lost taxi driver) On Apr 10, 2013 3:25 PM, "Christian Dähn" <da...@asinteg.de> wrote:
> ** > > On 04/10/2013 10:05 PM, Michael Jackson wrote: > > > > > > And just because a "majority" download the installer does not mean > "ALL". It is YOUR JOB AS A Qt DEVELOPER/MAINTAINER to make MY life easier. > That is your job. > > > > > > > I think you made a mistake and sent this email to an opensource > > project's mailing list instead of to your Sysadmin. > > In this special case he is right because he addresses Thiago (who works > for Digia and is partly responsible for the problems we commercial > customers have to suffer with the new Qt 5 policies). > > And yes: The best way would be a mail to the commercial support... > > But: Even the commercial support currently does nothing else as just > creating a public issue in the Qt-Project bugtracker ;-) > > Currently commercial customers more and more are less important and have > the same priority as any user of the opensource releases... sorry, my > experiences especially in the last weeks... > > Sadly none of the devs at Digia seems to have experiences with IT and > project structures of industrial and enterprise structures / companies - > that leads to such biased discussions... like a fight between commercial > (Windows) customers and the Qt devs (Linux/Mac users). > > ciao, > Chris > > _______________________________________________ > Interest mailing list > Interest@qt-project.org > http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest > >
_______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
